Kazooba & Anor v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 38 & 47 of 2012) [2018] UGCA 67 (30 July 2018)

Flynote
Evidence Law|Evaluation of Evidence|Review of Evidence
Case summary
Court observed from the record that the evidence that was relied on to implicate the first appellant was based on his conduct before and after the murder which is weak and leaves doubt as to the guilt of the appellant. There is no evidence to implicate the second appellant.

Loading PDF...

This document is 3.0 MB. Do you want to load it?

▲ To the top