Senkungu v Mukasa [2013] UGSC 9 (27 September 2013)

Flynote

Civil Remedies|Stay of Execution

Case summary

The court considered the affidavit evidence and observed that the applicants had filed a notice of appeal and the main application and an execution decree had been issued by the Court of Appeal which implied an imminent threat. However the court observed that delay by counsel for the applicants to file the record and memorandum of appeal could not be visited on the litigants. The application was thereby allowed.

---