Afrofam (U) Ltd Vs Binaisa & co Advocates (CIVIL SUIT No. 737 OF 1989) [1991] UGHCCD 2 (6 July 1991)

Flynote
Civil Procedure|Actions and applications
Case summary
The court, in consideration of the evidence on record, found that the plaintiff was entitled to file the suit so that the court could rule on who had the obligation to reimburse the money, which the plaintiff had overpaid.   The defendant’s objection was accordingly overruled.   Costs were awarded to the plaintiff.

Loading PDF...

This document is 958.5 KB. Do you want to load it?

▲ To the top