Mukasa v Baife & Anor (CIVIL APPEAL NO. MM 40/1988.) [1990] UGHCCD 1 (8 May 1990)

Flynote

Civil Procedure

Case summary

The court found that counsel for the appellant had omitted to add the second respondent. It was further stated that amending the memorandum of appeal to add the second respondent could not in any way cause injustice to the first respondent. As regards the second ground of appeal, the court invoked the inherent powers of the court to grant the remedy.   The court therefore found no merit in the objection of the application by the respondent.     The appeal was thereby allowed.

---