Mulimira Vs Kironde & 2 Ors (Civil Appeal No. 157 of 2012) [2019] UGCA 14 (27 March 2019)

Flynote
Property Law|Land
Case summary
The court held that as the first appellate court, they are required to re appraise the evidence on record and make their own inferences of fact and the law. That since the sale of the plots was subject to the subdividing which was not done, if the agreements presented by the appellants were not forgers, they were not sufficient to pass any property to him.

Loading PDF...

This document is 341.1 KB. Do you want to load it?

▲ To the top