Baingana & 3 Ors v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 29 of 2013) [2018] UGCA 66 (30 July 2018)

Jurisdiction: Uganda
Citation: Baingana & 3 Ors v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 29 of 2013) [2018] UGCA 66 (30 July 2018)
Media Neutral Citation: [2018] UGCA 66
Court: Court of Appeal of Uganda
Case number: Criminal Appeal No. 29 of 2013
Judges: Egonda-Ntende, JA, Obura, JA, Musota, JA
Judgment date: 30 July 2018
Language: English
Type: Judgment
Download: Download PDF (3.9 MB)

Flynote: Evidence Law|Evaluation of Evidence|Review of Evidence

Case summary: Court re-evaluated the evidence and held that the trial judge was misdirected to rely on circumstantial evidence that allegedly placed the first, second and third appellants at the scene of crime.

Loading PDF...

This document is 3.9 MB. Do you want to load it?

▲ To the top