Kamunye v Uganda Telecommunication Ltd (Civil Appeal No. 69 of 2011) [2018] UGCA 24 (31 May 2018)

Flynote
Civil Remedies|Costs|Labour and Employment Law|Wages, pensions and benefits|Terminal Benefits
Case summary
Court held that the evidence eon record is not sufficient to establish that the appellant transferred his services to the respondent’s employment and thus has no claim against the respondent. That the appellant’s services were terminated upon the splitting of the organisation and he was redundant without being placed and it’s the Ministry of Finance that was liable to pay the terminal benefits that accrued. On costs court held that the respondent had incurred these costs even though the matter was ex parte.

Loading PDF...

This document is 2.8 MB. Do you want to load it?

▲ To the top