Giruli Vs Mulekwa & Anor (Election Petition Appeal No. 76 of 2016) [2017] UGCA 124 (18 December 2017)

Flynote

Civil Procedure|Actions and applications

Case summary

The court considered the academic qualifications of the 1 st respondent and court observed that documentary evidence was produced with affidavits in support which was uncontroverted. The court considered the complaint that the academic qualifications of the 1 st respondent had been awarded by an incompetent institution. The court found that the institution was provisionally licensed. The appeal was thereby dismissed.

---