Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
English
Kiswahili
English
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Collections
Gazettes
Hansard
African Union and EAC
East African Community (EAC)
East African Court of Justice
East African Court of Appeal
African Court of Human and People's Rights
African Commission on Human and People's Rights
AU Charters and Treaties
Home
Collections
Case indexes
Refugees
Asylum Seeker
2 documents
Advanced search
Filters
Asylum Seeker
Filters
Years
2022
2015
Topics
Application
Arrest and detention
Asylum Seeker
Citizenship
Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
Illegal immigrant(s)
Principle of non-refoulement
Refugees
Rights of refugees
Alphabet
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Sort by:
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
2 documents
Title
Date
Abucar and 7 Others v Attorney General (Civil Suit No. 437 of 2019) [2022] UGHCCD 49 (18 March 2022)
Administrative circular denying citizenship by birth based on origin or skin colour is unlawful; eligible applicants entitled to documentation.
Citizenship — constitutional and statutory tests for citizenship by birth (Articles 9 and 10; s.12 Citizenship & Immigration Control Act) — prima facie weight of government-issued passports, IDs and birth certificates — administrative circular discriminating on origin/colour unlawful — remedies: declaratory relief and ordering issuance/renewal of identity documents.
Judgment
18 March 2022
Centre for Public Interest Law Ltd and Another v Attorney General (Constitutional Petition No. 34 of 2010) [2015] UGCC 9 (6 October 2015)
Article 12 registration exclusions stand; refugees remain eligible for consideration for naturalization under statutory law.
Constitutional interpretation – Citizenship by registration (Article 12) – rule of harmony; Citizenship by naturalization (Article 13) – statutory regime (section 16 of the Act) includes refugees as "aliens" eligible for consideration; Judicial relief – courts will not issue general orders against unnamed agencies absent evidence of a refused or unprocessed application.
Judgment
6 October 2015
1
>