background image
profile image

Supreme Court of Uganda

The Supreme Court of Uganda is the highest judicial organ in Uganda. It derives powers from Article 130 of the 1995 constitution. It is primarily an appellate court with original jurisdiction in only one type of case: a presidential election petition.

The Supreme Court is headed by the chief justice nd has ten other justices. The quorum required for a court decision varies depending on the type of case under consideration. When hearing a constitutional appeal, the required quorum is seven justices. In a criminal or a civil appeal, only five justices are required for a quorum.

 

Physical address
Plot M105, Kinawataka Road, Mbuya 1, Kampala, Uganda
1,626 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Topics
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
1,626 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
November 2019

 

29 November 2019
Identification and corroborative circumstantial evidence can destroy an alibi; remand time need not be arithmetically deducted pre-Rwabugande.
Criminal law – identification evidence and alibi; evaluation of minor inconsistencies; corroborative circumstantial evidence; prosecution’s discretion on witnesses; remand period credit and sentencing principles; standard of review in second appeals.
29 November 2019

 

28 November 2019
28 November 2019

 

28 November 2019
A defence placed on court record within 15 days, even if served slightly later due to registry delays, bars default judgment.
Civil procedure – Filing of defence – Order 8 r.19 and Order 9 r.1 – Filing is two-step: registry endorsement (court record) and service on opposite party; defence on record prevents default judgment; registrar delays may justify service after 15 days. Counterclaim – treated as fresh suit; service triggers reply period. Costs – costs to abide result of main suit.
28 November 2019

 

28 November 2019

 

27 November 2019

 

27 November 2019
21 November 2019
21 November 2019
Convicted murderer denied bail pending appeal; appeal prospects and medical evidence did not establish exceptional circumstances.
Bail pending appeal – Rule 6(2)(a) – exceptional circumstances required – prospects of success must be demonstrable (memorandum alone insufficient) – delay speculative – health grounds require evidence that prison cannot manage condition – offences involving personal violence weigh against bail.
20 November 2019

 

20 November 2019

 

15 November 2019

 

15 November 2019

 

11 November 2019
7 November 2019
7 November 2019
October 2019
31 October 2019

 

21 October 2019
September 2019

 

26 September 2019
Supreme Court reinstated an appellant's co-ownership of land, recognizing fraud and breach of contract by the respondent.
Land Law – Trusts and breaches – Fraud – Contractual obligations and misrepresentation – Land transfer and concealment of consideration – Remedies and damages in breach of trust.
19 September 2019

 

19 September 2019
19 September 2019
19 September 2019
Extension of time to file a notice of appeal dismissed for lack of sufficient reason and dilatory conduct by the State.
* Criminal procedure – extension of time to file notice of appeal – requirements under section 28 CPC and Rule 5 Supreme Court Rules; sufficient reason must relate to inability to take the step in time. * Extension of time – dilatory conduct – negligence by State agents is not a sufficient reason to extend time. * Appeals – acquittals – Director of Public Prosecutions’ right to appeal and procedural vigilance required when judgment is delivered in absence of State officers. * Discretionary relief – consideration of prejudice and injustice to parties when deciding extension applications.
18 September 2019
5 September 2019
5 September 2019

 

5 September 2019
5 September 2019
August 2019
29 August 2019
29 August 2019
29 August 2019
22 August 2019
22 August 2019
22 August 2019
An appeal against sentence severity will not succeed absent illegality or manifest excess; 35-year term for murder affirmed.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Appeal against severity of sentence – appellate interference only where sentence illegal, manifestly excessive or based on failure to consider material circumstance; mitigating factors (youth, intoxication, first offender) weighed against aggravating factors (planned, brutal killing; rarest of the rare) – 35 years imprisonment for murder affirmed.
9 August 2019
6 August 2019
July 2019

 

25 July 2019
25 July 2019
18 July 2019
5 July 2019
June 2019
28 June 2019

 

28 June 2019
Supreme Court declines to hold Attorney General in contempt for delayed electoral reforms, but issues new compliance deadlines and directives.
Constitutional law – Civil contempt of court – Supreme Court orders for implementation of electoral reforms – Attorney General’s duty to follow up and report – Wilfulness and mala fides in non-compliance – Judicial oversight of Executive compliance – Remedies and progressive reporting.
25 June 2019

 

25 June 2019
May 2019

 

19 May 2019
April 2019
25 April 2019

 

18 April 2019
Criminal law
17 April 2019