background image
profile image

Supreme Court of Uganda

The Supreme Court of Uganda is the highest judicial organ in Uganda. It derives powers from Article 130 of the 1995 constitution. It is primarily an appellate court with original jurisdiction in only one type of case: a presidential election petition.

The Supreme Court is headed by the chief justice nd has ten other justices. The quorum required for a court decision varies depending on the type of case under consideration. When hearing a constitutional appeal, the required quorum is seven justices. In a criminal or a civil appeal, only five justices are required for a quorum.

 

Physical address
Plot M105, Kinawataka Road, Mbuya 1, Kampala, Uganda
66 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
66 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 2017

 

20 December 2017

 

20 December 2017

 

20 December 2017
November 2017
An appellate court lacks jurisdiction to stay execution of a High Court order that has already expired.
Stay of execution; jurisdiction to stay expired orders; mootness of appeal where impugned order has ceased to exist; preconditions for stay (notice of appeal; likelihood of success; irreparable harm; balance of convenience) rendered irrelevant when underlying order expired; appellate court cannot decide stay after expiry; extension of trial court order is matter for trial court.
24 November 2017

Criminal law

7 November 2017

Criminal law

2 November 2017
October 2017

 

23 October 2017
Court affirms judicial discretion in deferring rulings on preliminary objections, and confirms cause of action was disclosed.
Civil Procedure – discretion to defer ruling on preliminary objection – cause of action determination under Order 7 Rule 11 – judicial discretion and standards.
11 October 2017
The Court upheld a kidnapping-with-intent conviction based on corroborated accomplice evidence and affirmed life imprisonment.
* Criminal law – Second appeal – duty of first appellate court to re-evaluate evidence. * Criminal law – Accomplice evidence – requirement and nature of corroboration; independent and circumstantial corroboration sufficient in material particulars. * Criminal law – Kidnapping with intent to murder – ritual killing of a child. * Sentencing – life imprisonment; appellate review limited unless manifestly excessive or wrong in principle.
6 October 2017

 

6 October 2017

Civil Procedure|Appeals and reviews

5 October 2017
September 2017

Criminal law

20 September 2017
Criminal law
20 September 2017
Appellate court upheld conviction, refused late supplementary ground, and held a 22-year sentence lawful.
Criminal law – aggravated defilement – credibility and corroboration of child complainant; appellate re-evaluation of evidence; procedural rules for lodging supplementary grounds of appeal; assessors' oaths; sentencing law – validity of fixed-term sentences exceeding statutory 20-year deeming of life imprisonment; scope of appellate review on sentence.
20 September 2017
Criminal law|Evidence Law
15 September 2017

Civil Procedure|Criminal law

15 September 2017
August 2017

Civil Procedure|Human Rights|Liberty

16 August 2017

Civil Remedies|Strike-Out

16 August 2017
14 August 2017

 

10 August 2017
Criminal law|Evidence Law
2 August 2017
July 2017
Civil Procedure|Appeals and reviews|Notice of Appeal
19 July 2017
Foreign marriage recognised for succession; spouse living abroad disqualified under s.30; Administrator General’s grant upheld.
Succession – validity of foreign marriage – marriage celebrated abroad recognised for succession if valid where celebrated; Customary marriage – cannot subsist where valid prior foreign marriage exists; Administrator General – procedural hearing requirement, but failure may not void grant absent miscarriage of justice; Succession Act s.30 – separation as household member disqualifies spouse from intestate share; Residential occupation – minor children’s welfare justifies temporary occupancy and may be accounted as part of their share.
10 July 2017
10 July 2017

Civil Procedure|Appeals and reviews|Role of Appellate Court

10 July 2017
June 2017
Leave granted to appeal to resolve substituted service, appellate limits when setting aside ex parte judgments, and third‑party interests.
Appeals – Third appeal (section 6(2) Judicature Act; Rule 39) – Leave where Court must see that justice is done; Civil procedure – substituted service (Order 5 r.18 CPR) – effectiveness and prior authority; Appellate jurisdiction – limits when setting aside ex parte judgments; Protection of third-party bona fide purchasers and estate beneficiaries.
16 June 2017
Second Appeal|Criminal law
16 June 2017
Civil Procedure|Review of Judgment
16 June 2017
Criminal law
16 June 2017
Criminal law
15 June 2017
Civil Procedure|Appeals and reviews
8 June 2017
May 2017

 

29 May 2017
Civil Procedure
29 May 2017
Constitutional Law|Constitutional Interpretation
22 May 2017
Supreme Court holds Rules Committee validly made procedural rules for enforcement of constitutional rights; Rules are constitutional.
Constitutional law – enforcement of fundamental rights – Article 50(1) and (4) – whether procedural rules made by Rules Committee under Judicature Act valid; Statutory instruments – section 41(5) Judicature Act – requirement to lay rules before Parliament and effect of failure to lay; Separation of powers – Parliament’s duty to enact enabling law under Article 50(4) but procedural rules by judiciary remain valid until annulled; Constitutional procedure – duty of Constitutional Court to answer referred question and give guidance to trial court.
22 May 2017
Civil Procedure
17 May 2017
Civil Procedure|Appeals and reviews
5 May 2017
Chief Justice may designate magistrates to assist a High Court division without altering composition or denying fair hearing.
Constitutional law — Chief Justice administrative powers (Art.133) — Practice Directions establishing High Court Anti‑Corruption Division — "Designated magistrates" as assistants, not members of High Court (Art.138) — Interaction with Magistrates Courts Act (ss.6,7,161) — Territorial jurisdiction and right to fair hearing (Arts.28,44) — No nullity absent evidence of acting beyond jurisdiction.
5 May 2017

Civil Procedure

5 May 2017

 

4 May 2017
April 2017

Criminal law

28 April 2017

Slip Rule

28 April 2017

Slip Rule

28 April 2017

 

28 April 2017

 

26 April 2017
Criminal law
19 April 2017
Land
6 April 2017

Civil Procedure|Appeals and reviews|Notice of Appeal

6 April 2017
Retracted confessions properly admitted and corroborated; common intention proved, so conviction and 28-year sentence upheld.
• Evidence — Confession — Trial-within-a-trial — Voluntariness and admissibility of retracted/repudiated confessions; same officer recording statements distinguished where taken days apart and in local language. • Corroboration — Confession may suffice if true; physical and eyewitness evidence corroborating confession (hammer with blood, deceased’s shoes, witnesses' testimony). • Criminal law — Common intention (s.20 Penal Code) — joint liability where participants combine for same illegal purpose. • Sentence — Appellate interference limited to illegality or manifest excess; 28-year term upheld.
6 April 2017

Land

6 April 2017