background image
profile image

Supreme Court of Uganda

The Supreme Court of Uganda is the highest judicial organ in Uganda. It derives powers from Article 130 of the 1995 constitution. It is primarily an appellate court with original jurisdiction in only one type of case: a presidential election petition.

The Supreme Court is headed by the chief justice nd has ten other justices. The quorum required for a court decision varies depending on the type of case under consideration. When hearing a constitutional appeal, the required quorum is seven justices. In a criminal or a civil appeal, only five justices are required for a quorum.

 

Physical address
Plot M105, Kinawataka Road, Mbuya 1, Kampala, Uganda
9 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
9 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
January 2011
Applicant failed to show respondent's appeal lacked reasonable prospects despite evidence suggesting inability to pay; application for security dismissed.
Security for costs – Rule 101(1)(b) Supreme Court Rules; Companies Act s.404 – power to require security where limited company likely unable to pay costs; burden on applicant to justify further security; foreign company with no known assets/address; prospect of success on appeal as limiting factor.
27 January 2011
27 January 2011
27 January 2011
Bank's guarantee enforceable despite undated tax-clearance condition; interest reduced to 10% from High Court judgment; appeal dismissed.
Guarantee – interpretation of written guarantee and undated condition precedent – tax clearance certificates – condition relating to assets only – Income Tax Act s.166(2) (capital assets disposed before 1 April 1998) – demand under guarantee (form of demand) – evaluation of evidence – award and timing of interest.
25 January 2011
The appellant bank was held liable under its guarantee as the tax-clearance condition was superfluous; interest reduced to 10%.
Bank guarantee — condition precedent — tax clearance certificates — interpretation of guarantee and sale agreement — Income Tax Act s.166(7) — enforceability of guarantee — form of demand — award of interest (reduction from 18% to 10%)
25 January 2011
A late bidder lacked legal standing to judicially challenge a halted procurement; PPDA’s recommendations were lawful.
Administrative law – Public procurement – PPDA powers and procedure; section 90–91 of Public Procurement Act; Regulations 136–140 and 57; validity of PPDA meetings and recommendations; bidder locus and late bid submissions
25 January 2011
Murder conviction quashed and substituted with manslaughter where malice aforethought was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Homicide: murder vs manslaughter – Malice aforethought (intention to kill or knowledge death will probably result) – subjective inference from circumstances – proof beyond reasonable doubt – role of mitigating conduct and medical evidence on severity of injuries – substitution of conviction and remittal for sentencing
25 January 2011
Stay denied where applicant failed to obtain leave to appeal and show likelihood of success or irreparable harm.
Civil procedure – Stay of execution pending appeal – Requirement to obtain leave to appeal where review dismissed (Order 44 r.2 CPR) – Necessity of notice of appeal (rule 72) – Need to show likelihood of success and irreparable loss – Security for performance/costs
7 January 2011
Court granted leave to file out-of-time appeal record, finding prior technical striking-out not res judicata; applicant to pay costs.
Civil procedure — Extension of time to file record and memorandum of appeal — Leave to file out of time — Effect of prior striking out for defective affidavit — Agency/advocate negligence — Power of attorney and competency of affidavit from illiterate deponent
7 January 2011