background image
profile image

Supreme Court of Uganda

The Supreme Court of Uganda is the highest judicial organ in Uganda. It derives powers from Article 130 of the 1995 constitution. It is primarily an appellate court with original jurisdiction in only one type of case: a presidential election petition.

The Supreme Court is headed by the chief justice nd has ten other justices. The quorum required for a court decision varies depending on the type of case under consideration. When hearing a constitutional appeal, the required quorum is seven justices. In a criminal or a civil appeal, only five justices are required for a quorum.

 

Physical address
Plot M105, Kinawataka Road, Mbuya 1, Kampala, Uganda
9 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
9 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
January 2011
Applicant failed to show respondent's appeal lacked reasonable prospects despite evidence suggesting inability to pay; application for security dismissed.
Security for costs – Rule 101(1)(b) Supreme Court Rules; Companies Act s.404 – power to require security where limited company likely unable to pay costs; burden on applicant to justify further security; foreign company with no known assets/address; prospect of success on appeal as limiting factor.
27 January 2011
27 January 2011
27 January 2011
Bank's guarantee enforceable despite undated tax-clearance condition; interest reduced to 10% from High Court judgment; appeal dismissed.
Guarantee – interpretation of written guarantee and undated condition precedent – tax clearance certificates – condition relating to assets only – Income Tax Act s.166(2) (capital assets disposed before 1 April 1998) – demand under guarantee (form of demand) – evaluation of evidence – award and timing of interest.
25 January 2011
A bank’s refusal to pay under a guarantee was wrongful where the tax‑clearance condition applied only to the assets and was superfluous.
Guarantee – construction of guarantee and condition precedent; tax‑clearance condition held to relate to assets and rendered inoperative by Income Tax Act s.166(7); demand under a guarantee may be oral where instrument is silent; appellate discretion on interest awards (reduction to 10% p.a.).
25 January 2011
Whether a late bidder had enforceable procurement rights and whether PPDA’s recommendations and temporary contract extension were lawful.
Public procurement — PPDA authority and delegation — sections 90–91 and Regulations 136–140; validity of administrative meetings and recommendations; procurement process suspension and bidder status; regulation 57 — notification and bidder rights; locus standi for judicial review in procurement disputes.
25 January 2011
Murder conviction quashed where malice aforethought not proven; conviction substituted to manslaughter and sentence remitted for mitigation.
Criminal law – homicide – murder vs manslaughter – proof of malice aforethought (Penal Code s.191) must be subjective and proved beyond reasonable doubt; inference of intent from circumstances; role of accused’s post-offence conduct and post-mortem evidence in negating intent.
25 January 2011
Stay of execution refused for lack of leave to appeal and failure to show likelihood of success or irreparable harm.
Civil procedure – stay of execution pending appeal under Rule 6(2)(b) of Supreme Court Rules; requirement to lodge notice of appeal (Rule 72); necessity of leave under Order 44(2) CPR for appeals from dismissal of review applications; need to show likelihood of success and irreparable loss; security for due performance.
7 January 2011
Court granted extension to file appeal record out of time, finding prior striking-out technical and sufficient cause shown.
Civil procedure – extension of time to file record and memorandum of appeal – adequacy of affidavit evidence – effect of advocates’ negligence – res judicata where prior application struck out on technical grounds.
7 January 2011