background image
profile image

Supreme Court of Uganda

The Supreme Court of Uganda is the highest judicial organ in Uganda. It derives powers from Article 130 of the 1995 constitution. It is primarily an appellate court with original jurisdiction in only one type of case: a presidential election petition.

The Supreme Court is headed by the chief justice nd has ten other justices. The quorum required for a court decision varies depending on the type of case under consideration. When hearing a constitutional appeal, the required quorum is seven justices. In a criminal or a civil appeal, only five justices are required for a quorum.

 

Physical address
Plot M105, Kinawataka Road, Mbuya 1, Kampala, Uganda
38 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
38 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 2007

 

20 December 2007
November 2007

Civil Procedure|Actions and applications

19 November 2007
October 2007
Civil Procedure|Actions and applications|Delict and Tort Law|Negligence|Evidence Law|Evaluation of Evidence
18 October 2007
Where Supreme Court Rules, not special Parliamentary Elections rules, govern appeals, late filing may render an appeal incompetent but extension may be granted.
Civil procedure – election petitions – applicability of Parliamentary Elections (Election Petitions) Rules versus Supreme Court Rules to appeals – late filing of memorandum and record of appeal – competence of appeal – extension of time in interests of justice.
17 October 2007
Civil Procedure|Appeals and reviews|Constitutional Law|Elections
17 October 2007
Criminal law|Evidence Law|Evaluation of Evidence
16 October 2007
Confession found voluntary and corroborated; circumstantial evidence and common intention upheld, convictions dismissed on appeal and sentence confirmation postponed.
Criminal law – confession – trial‑within‑a‑trial – voluntariness and corroboration; Circumstantial evidence – common intention – threats, movements and conduct at scene; Appeal – first appellate re‑evaluation of evidence; Evidence Act s.28 – confession implicating co‑accused.
16 October 2007
Criminal law|Evidence Law|Burden of Proof|Evaluation of Evidence
16 October 2007
September 2007

Civil Procedure|Appeals and reviews|Notice of Appeal

21 September 2007
Company Law|Shareholders|Property Law|Land|Land Dispute
21 September 2007

Civil Procedure|Actions and applications|Conduct of proceedings

21 September 2007
Attachment of Property|Sale of Property|Warrant For Sale of Property|Bona Fide Purchaser|CL
21 September 2007
August 2007
2 August 2007

 

2 August 2007
July 2007
Criminal law|Evidence Law|Burden of Proof
10 July 2007
Civil Procedure|Actions and applications|Evidence Law|Burden of Proof
10 July 2007
Civil Procedure|Appeals and reviews|Evidence Law|Evaluation of Evidence
10 July 2007

Bank-Customer Relationship|Fraud|Agency|Breach of Fiduciary Duties|Fiduciary Duty of A Bank|Mortgage|CL

10 July 2007

Civil Procedure|Actions and applications

5 July 2007

Civil Procedure|Orders

5 July 2007

Criminal law

5 July 2007
Criminal law|Evidence Law|Burden of Proof|Evaluation of Evidence
5 July 2007

Criminal law|Evidence Law|Evaluation of Evidence

5 July 2007
5 July 2007
June 2007
Civil Procedure|Affidavits|Affidavit
27 June 2007
Civil Procedure|Actions and applications|Elections
20 June 2007

 

13 June 2007
Whether an advocate’s mistaken non-appearance constitutes sufficient cause to reinstate a dismissed suit.
Civil procedure — non-appearance at hearing — sufficiency of cause — affidavit by advocate explaining non-appearance; Advocate’s error — mistake by counsel not to be visited on party; Affidavit formalities — omission of commissioner’s name not fatal where defect not timely raised.
7 June 2007
An advocate’s mistaken belief about settlement can constitute sufficient cause to reinstate a dismissed suit.
Civil procedure – reinstatement of suit – sufficient cause for non-appearance – affidavit by advocate explained mistake – party need not personally swear – mistake by advocate not visited on party – formal defect in affidavit (absence of commissioner’s name) not fatal if not timely raised.
7 June 2007
May 2007
The court upheld convictions for murder, finding the confession admissible and sufficiently corroborated by strong circumstantial evidence.
Criminal law – murder – admissibility of confession – voluntariness of confessions – role of investigating officer – corroboration of co-accused's confession – assessment of alibi – circumstantial evidence.
30 May 2007
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for aggravated robbery and postponed sentence confirmation pending constitutional review of the death penalty.
Criminal law – aggravated robbery – single identifying witness – standard for appellate review – sufficiency of evidence – duty of first appellate court – consideration of alibi – postponement of sentence pending constitutional litigation.
30 May 2007

 

30 May 2007
March 2007
An application for extension of time unsupported by a sworn affidavit is incompetent and was struck out with costs.
Civil procedure – Extension of time – Rule 5 requires "sufficient reason" to extend time – Formal applications must be supported by sworn affidavits under Rule 43(1) – Unsigned/unsworn document is not an affidavit – Application lacking sworn affidavit is incompetent and liable to be struck out.
29 March 2007
No statutory right of appeal to the Supreme Court exists for LC V election petitions; application for extension dismissed.
Local Government elections – appealability – District Chairperson election petitions – section 145(3) Local Governments Act makes Court of Appeal decision final; no right of appeal to Supreme Court unless expressly provided by statute; appellate jurisdiction is a creature of statute.
29 March 2007

 

20 March 2007
Criminal law|Evidence Law|Evaluation of Evidence
20 March 2007
February 2007
Supreme Court held respondents were bona fide occupants, not customary owners, and annulled fraudulent land title. Appeal dismissed.
Land law – Bona fide occupancy – Unlawful allocation of land – Customary tenure vs. bona fide possession – Fraudulent acquisition of title.
11 February 2007
January 2007

Affidavits|Constitutional Law|Elections|Evidence Law|Burden of Proof|Evaluation of Evidence

30 January 2007