background image
profile image

Supreme Court of Uganda

The Supreme Court of Uganda is the highest judicial organ in Uganda. It derives powers from Article 130 of the 1995 constitution. It is primarily an appellate court with original jurisdiction in only one type of case: a presidential election petition.

The Supreme Court is headed by the chief justice nd has ten other justices. The quorum required for a court decision varies depending on the type of case under consideration. When hearing a constitutional appeal, the required quorum is seven justices. In a criminal or a civil appeal, only five justices are required for a quorum.

 

Physical address
Plot M105, Kinawataka Road, Mbuya 1, Kampala, Uganda
25 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
25 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
November 2006
Civil Procedure|Actions and applications|Property Law|Land
23 November 2006

 

23 November 2006
October 2006
Criminal law|Evidence Law|Evaluation of Evidence
25 October 2006
Appeals dismissed: confessions to police were properly admitted and the prior appellate decision was correct.
Criminal law – murder – admissibility of confessions to police – appellate review of trial judge’s ruling – Court of Appeal and Supreme Court uphold admissibility.
25 October 2006
Civil Procedure|Actions and applications|Appeals and reviews|Civil Remedies|Damages
18 October 2006
Contract Law|Termination of Contract
3 October 2006
Civil Procedure|Appeals and reviews|Intellectual Property Law|Trademarks
3 October 2006
September 2006
Service on one partner is not necessarily "effective" on the partnership; consent judgment set aside and leave granted to defend.
Civil Procedure – Summary suits – Leave to appear and defend under r.11 O.36 (O.33) – Distinction between "deemed good service" on partnership and "effective service" – Service on one partner does not automatically bind other partners absent evidence it produced notice – Consent judgment by one partner not conclusive where lack of authority and alleged fraud/conspiracy raise triable issues.
21 September 2006
August 2006
A university may lawfully schedule exams on Saturdays where accommodation is impractical and the public interest in expanding education justifies the policy.
* Constitutional law – freedom of religion – whether university scheduling of lectures/examinations on Saturdays infringes Article 29(1)(c). * Constitutional law – limitation and balancing – rights not absolute; must be balanced against public interest and institutional mandate. * Administrative law/education law – reasonable accommodation – practicality, administrative burden, cost and examination integrity as limits to accommodation.
18 August 2006
Civil Procedure|Appeals and reviews|Notice of Appeal
3 August 2006
Constitutional Law|Constitutional Interpretation
1 August 2006
Constitutional Law|Constitutional Interpretation
1 August 2006
July 2006

Civil Procedure|Appeals and reviews|Role of Appellate Court|Labour and Employment Law|Retirement

28 July 2006
Criminal law
21 July 2006
Circumstantial evidence and s.30 statements upheld as sufficient to prove murder and common intention; appeals dismissed.
Criminal law – circumstantial evidence – inculpatory facts must be incompatible with innocence; Evidence Act s.30(a) – statements as to circumstances of transaction admissible; common intention – proved by planning, presence and conduct; appellate review – second appeal will not re-evaluate factual findings absent exceptional case.
21 July 2006
March 2006

Civil Procedure|Appeals and reviews|Jurisdiction|Constitutional Law|Constitutional Interpretation

15 March 2006
Civil Procedure|Institution of proceedings|Filing of Process
15 March 2006
Appellate courts may reduce excessive general damages where awards lack evidential support, especially absent expert proof of permanent injury.
Civil damages — appellate interference with awards of general damages — appellate court will not interfere unless trial court acted on wrong principle or amount is manifestly erroneous; requirement for adequate medical evidence to prove permanent injury in personal injury claims; product contamination and negligence — proof and causation.
14 March 2006
Civil Procedure|Appeals and reviews|Delict and Tort Law|Negligence
14 March 2006

Civil Procedure|Principles|Res Judicata|Property Law|Mortgage, loans and bonds|Mortgage

14 March 2006

Administrative Law|Natural Justice

14 March 2006
February 2006
Criminal law|Evidence Law|Evaluation of Evidence
15 February 2006
January 2006
Civil Procedure|Delict and Tort Law|Negligence|Evidence Law|Evaluation of Evidence
17 January 2006

Civil Procedure|Evidence Law|Evaluation of Evidence

17 January 2006
Contract Law|Formation and validity of Contract|Contract Formation
17 January 2006