background image
profile image

Supreme Court of Uganda

The Supreme Court of Uganda is the highest judicial organ in Uganda. It derives powers from Article 130 of the 1995 constitution. It is primarily an appellate court with original jurisdiction in only one type of case: a presidential election petition.

The Supreme Court is headed by the chief justice nd has ten other justices. The quorum required for a court decision varies depending on the type of case under consideration. When hearing a constitutional appeal, the required quorum is seven justices. In a criminal or a civil appeal, only five justices are required for a quorum.

 

Physical address
Plot M105, Kinawataka Road, Mbuya 1, Kampala, Uganda
9 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
9 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
April 1997

Liability of Company Directors

14 April 1997
Court may remit or set aside an arbitral award under ss.11–12 of the Arbitration Act; awards are not necessarily final.
Arbitration — Arbitration Act s.11 and s.12 — Court’s power to remit award for reconsideration and to set aside awards where arbitrator misconducted himself or arbitration improperly procured — Arbitral award not necessarily final and conclusive — Judicial intervention permissible in interests of justice.
14 April 1997

 

11 April 1997
Whether Uganda applies the English matrimonial law as at reception (1904) or as updated, and effect on the three‑year petition rule.
• Interpretation of "law applied in matrimonial proceedings in the High Court of Justice in England" under section 4 of the Divorce Act – reception date versus continuing reference to English law. • Application and qualification of imported English law under section 3(2) and 3(3) of the Judicature Act, 1967. • Effect of subsequent English matrimonial statutes on Ugandan divorce jurisdiction and procedure. • Procedural requirement as to time of presenting a petition for divorce and necessity of leave of the court.
11 April 1997
Order for security for costs upheld where appellant abroad failed to prove substantial fixed assets in Uganda.
Civil procedure – Security for costs – Plaintiff resident abroad – prima facie requirement for security unless substantial fixed assets in jurisdiction shown. Property – Speculative inheritance from unadministered estate does not constitute fixed, available assets for resisting security orders. Discretionary relief – Court may consider merits/prospects of success when ordering security for costs. Abuse of process – Mere poverty does not make security order oppressive; courts must guard against oppressive use but may still order security. Foreign judgments – Reciprocal enforcement requires statutory designation; absence of evidence of designation or foreign assets does not avoid security.
11 April 1997

 

8 April 1997

 

7 April 1997

 

3 April 1997
Trial court’s discretion on pleadings, adjournments and evidence upheld; respondent awarded contract price and interest from filing date.
Civil procedure — amendment of pleadings — misnomer and corrective amendments — leave to amend and consequences — discretion exercised by trial judge. Civil procedure — adjournments and framing of issues — court’s discretion and sufficiency of cause. Evidence — pleadings govern scope of admissible evidence — exclusion of evidence beyond pleadings and refusal to allow late amendment. Contract — construction contracts — substantial performance entitling recovery of contract price despite defects. Contract — extensions of time and consultant decisions affecting penalty for delay. Interest — awarding interest from date of filing suit under court’s discretion and Civil Procedure Act.
3 April 1997