background image
profile image

Supreme Court of Uganda

The Supreme Court of Uganda is the highest judicial organ in Uganda. It derives powers from Article 130 of the 1995 constitution. It is primarily an appellate court with original jurisdiction in only one type of case: a presidential election petition.

The Supreme Court is headed by the chief justice nd has ten other justices. The quorum required for a court decision varies depending on the type of case under consideration. When hearing a constitutional appeal, the required quorum is seven justices. In a criminal or a civil appeal, only five justices are required for a quorum.

 

Physical address
Plot M105, Kinawataka Road, Mbuya 1, Kampala, Uganda
10 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
10 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 1992

 

21 December 1992
The appellant's murder and kidnapping convictions were quashed due to unsafe identification and evidential failings after a long delay.
* Criminal law – Alternative charging – murder and kidnapping with intent – where murder may be the culmination of a kidnapping; charging in the alternative appropriate where doubt exists. * Evidence – Proof of death – medical evidence not always necessary but circumstantial proof must be cogent and beyond reasonable doubt. * Identification – necessity of contemporaneous reports/descriptions, calling of initial reporters and proper directions to assessors; long delay increases risk of mistaken identity. * Procedure – absence of defence counsel during summing-up to assessors noted but not determinative where convictions are unsafe.
18 December 1992

 

8 December 1992

 

1 December 1992

 

1 December 1992

 

1 December 1992

 

1 December 1992

 

1 December 1992
Murder conviction quashed for insufficient medical proof; identification evidence upheld, affirming aggravated robbery convictions and death sentences.
Criminal law – murder – insufficiency of medical evidence to prove causation; Identification evidence – recognition by witnesses who knew accused before incident – opportunity, distance and lighting; Delay and absence of identification parade – effect on reliability; Aggravated robbery – convictions upheld on strong identification and corroboration; Evidence – caution on preliminary hearings (S.64/S.65) and admissibility of statements of dead/absent witnesses.
1 December 1992

 

1 December 1992