background image
profile image

Supreme Court of Uganda

The Supreme Court of Uganda is the highest judicial organ in Uganda. It derives powers from Article 130 of the 1995 constitution. It is primarily an appellate court with original jurisdiction in only one type of case: a presidential election petition.

The Supreme Court is headed by the chief justice nd has ten other justices. The quorum required for a court decision varies depending on the type of case under consideration. When hearing a constitutional appeal, the required quorum is seven justices. In a criminal or a civil appeal, only five justices are required for a quorum.

 

Physical address
Plot M105, Kinawataka Road, Mbuya 1, Kampala, Uganda
12 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
12 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 1989
Criminal law
5 December 1989
November 1989

 

14 November 1989

 

7 November 1989
August 1989
Appeal allowed in part: sale held voidable for duress, non-registration did not automatically void contract, mesne-profits award set aside.
Property law – contract of sale – effect of non-registration of transfer – unregistered instrument operates as contract inter partes; Registration of Titles Act. Contract law – duress – sale induced by threats to personal safety attributable to Head of State makes contract voidable. Civil procedure – appellate review of evidence – duty to review and reach own conclusion. Remedies – mesne profits – requirement of proof; voidable contract valid until set aside.
23 August 1989
Whether the firearm constituted a deadly weapon and whether the appellants were properly identified beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Aggravated robbery – Proof of identification – Reliability of eyewitness evidence in surprise ambush – Deadly weapon under s.273(2) – Firearm capability and evidence of firing – Acting in concert – Mandatory death sentence.
11 August 1989
Criminal law
3 August 1989
July 1989
Evidence Law|Evaluation of Evidence
26 July 1989
Criminal law
26 July 1989

 

7 July 1989

 

7 July 1989
Appellate court held no proved conditional agreement for cattle payments; removal from title for fraud requires proof of actual dishonesty.
* Land law – allocation and registration – documentary evidence (application, lease offer, certificate of title) may prevail over later oral assertions as to terms of inclusion on title. * Evidence – appellate review of credibility where documentary record conflicts with oral testimony; duty to rehear and weigh evidence but not to disregard trial judge’s advantage in demeanour. * Registration of Titles Act s.184 – rectification/removal of a registered proprietor’s name for fraud requires proof of actual dishonesty, not mere constructive or equitable fraud. * Pleading – fraud should normally be pleaded and particularised; failure to plead and prove fraud defeats rectification/ejectment relief.
7 July 1989
April 1989
Applicant failed to show sufficient cause for extension of time to seek leave to appeal; application dismissed with costs.
• Civil procedure – extension of time – burden to show sufficient cause for delay in instituting appeal.• Civil procedure – leave to appeal – procedural requirement to apply by Notice of Motion rather than orally.• Civil procedure – remedy following refusal of leave – appeal to the higher court rather than rehearing by another High Court judge.• Advocacy – impropriety of counsel acting as witness in proceedings.
24 April 1989