Industrial Court of Uganda

The Industrial Court was established under the Labour Disputes (Arbitration and Settlement) Act, 2006 Cap 224, Laws of Uganda, and section 7.  2006.

The Act was assentenced to on 24th May 2006; and commenced on the 07th August 2006 via a Ministerial statutory instrument.

The Court's jurisdiction ambit are labour disputes referred to it by a party to a dispute where a labour officer has failed to dispose of the dispute within 08 weeks under the court's regulations as requested under the act, disputes referred by the Labour officer at the request of the party or on the officer's own volition when is unable to resolve the dispute; or by responsible Minister on notice of an intended withdrawal of labour within 05 days. Appeals can also be filed against labour officers' decision under the Employment Act. The Court has no original jurisdiction over Labour disputes.

 

Physical address
Plot 25-27, off Martyr's way Ntinda. P.O.Box, 21456 Kampala.
40 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
40 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 2018
Failure to give pre-dismissal reasons and hearing renders a dismissal unlawful; damages awarded, reinstatement denied.
Employment law – dismissal procedure – Sections 66 and 68 Employment Act 2006 – employer must give reasons and a hearing before deciding to dismiss; failure renders dismissal unlawful; evidence at trial does not cure lack of pre-dismissal disciplinary hearing; reinstatement discretionary where trust irreparably broken; damages and terminal benefits remedies for unlawful dismissal.
21 December 2018
Claim reinstated where registrar failed to notify and dismissal followed counsel's negligence; memorandum not out of time.
Civil procedure — Dismissal under Order 17 r.4 — Finality vs. Industrial Court rules; Registrar's duty under rule 5(1)/rule 16 to give notice before memorandum time runs; Counsel's negligence not necessarily fatal to claimant; Reinstatement to enable decision on merits.
21 December 2018
November 2018
Court refused injunction preventing mortgage enforcement by employer-bank pending resolution of unlawful dismissal claim.
* Labour law – temporary injunction – application to restrain mortgage enforcement pending unfair dismissal claim;* Security interests – mortgage deed between employee and employer treated as commercial transaction;* Interim relief – irreparable harm, adequacy of damages, and probability of success required for injunction.
23 November 2018
An ex parte labour award must first be set aside at the issuing labour office; mediation cannot substitute for adjudication.
Ex parte labour awards — remedy to set aside at issuing labour office before appeal; Mediation v adjudication — labour officer cannot both mediate and adjudicate; Referral/remittal — failed mediation requires referral to adjudication or arbitration by a different officer; Procedural fairness — right to be heard in labour proceedings.
23 November 2018
An employee’s admission to altering company records justified summary dismissal, but statutory four-week pay awarded for lack of hearing.
Employment law – summary dismissal – admission of misconduct – Section 69 Employment Act; procedural hearing requirement – Section 66(4) penalty of four weeks’ pay; remedies and limits of Labour Officer’s powers; interest awarded by Court under s.94(3).
16 November 2018
October 2018
Constructive and unfair termination established; claimant awarded damages, severance and allowances; leave and rent claims rejected.
Employment law – constructive dismissal – s.65(1)(c) Employment Act; unfair termination – failure to give reasons and hold fair hearing (ss.2, 66, 68); remedies – general damages, special damages, severance (s.8, s.89), aggravated damages; proof required for special damages and leave in lieu.
17 October 2018
September 2018
Appeal grounds raising mixed law and fact without leave are incompetent; duplicate cross-appeal struck out as abuse of process.
Employment law – Appeals from labour officer – Section 94(2) Employment Act requires leave for questions of fact; mixed law-and-fact grounds without leave are incompetent. Civil procedure – Abuse of process – Section 6 Civil Procedure Act bars proceedings when same matter is directly and substantially in issue in a pending suit between same parties; duplicate cross-appeal struck out.
5 September 2018
Court ordered UGX 150,000,000 security from foreign respondent under Order 40 r1, finding inadequate proof it would remain or satisfy judgment.
Civil procedure – Order 40 r 1 CPR – Security pending determination – Applies to companies – Applicant must show likelihood of absconding or of frustrating execution – Court balances interests and may require undertaking and security.
5 September 2018
August 2018
Claimant's resignation held voluntary (not constructive dismissal); employer entitled to recover loan balance and notice pay; claimant awarded unpaid suspended salary.
* Employment law – Constructive dismissal – Section 65(1)(c) Employment Act 2006 – burden to prove unreasonable employer conduct causing resignation; suspension, disciplinary process and demotion. * Reliefs – entitlement to unpaid salary during suspension; rejection of leave payment where employee did not apply; employer’s right to recover employee loan balance and payment in lieu of notice.
24 August 2018
Resignation not constructive dismissal; employer conduct lawful, dismissal void as resignation was effective; only accrued leave payable.
Employment law – Constructive dismissal – section 65(1)(c) Employment Act – employer conduct must be illegal, injurious and render continued employment impossible; resignation effectiveness – employer must communicate rejection of resignation; resignation and handover procedures – employer policies must be specifically applicable to resignation; entitlement to accrued annual leave.
17 August 2018
A labour officer who transfers a matter to adjudication after a timely section 5 referral request frustrates mandatory referral; ensuing adjudication is void.
Labour law – LADASA ss.4–5 – Mandatory referral to Industrial Court after failed conciliation/mediation within four weeks – Interaction with Employment Act s.93(7) (90-day option) – Adjudication under s.13 distinct from conciliation – Transfer to adjudication after request to refer renders proceedings void.
10 August 2018
Adjudication started after a valid request for referral to the Industrial Court was void; matter remitted to Industrial Court under s.5 LADASA.
Labour law – LADASA sections 4 and 5 – referral to Industrial Court after failed conciliation/mediation; Employment Act s.13 adjudication distinguished from s.4 conciliation; Employment Act s.93(7) 90‑day rule; irregular transfer of file and void adjudication proceedings.
10 August 2018
Termination without a substantiated reason is unfair; claimant lacked entitlement to 11–20 year benefits absent completing the 11th year.
Employment law – termination and dismissal – employer’s obligation under section 68 to prove a reason for termination; insufficiency of a bare statement that “services are no longer required”; statutory interpretation of staff-regulation benefit bands – entry/completion of 11th year required to qualify for 11–20 years benefits; remedy – award of general damages for unfair termination.
10 August 2018
Termination was unfair where employer's vague 'services no longer required' reason was unsubstantiated; claimant awarded UGX 4,000,000.
Employment law – Termination – Employer must provide a clear, justifiable reason under s.68 for dismissal/termination; vague statements like 'services no longer required' are insufficient. Employment law – Terminal benefits – Entitlement determined by completed years of service; partial years do not elevate an employee to the next benefits bracket. Remedies – Unfair termination may attract general damages even where terminal benefits have been paid (if paid late or dismissal unjustified).
10 August 2018
July 2018
Claimant failed to prove unfair termination; court found abscondment and ordered return of recovered office items.
* Employment law – unfair termination – constructive dismissal under section 65(1)(c) – employer conduct must be serious, illegal or make work impossible. * Procedure – suspension under section 63(2) – necessity to prove service and follow-up inquiry. * Abscondment – failure to attend reconciliation/open office may constitute abscondment. * Evidence – burden on claimant to prove receipt of suspension and ownership of locked office items. * Remedies – return of recovered property; dismissal of termination claim where termination not proved.
27 July 2018
Claimant’s refusal to attend reconciliation and disappearance amounted to abscondment; no unfair termination proved; recovered items ordered returned.
Employment law – constructive dismissal – section 65(1)(c) Employment Act – employer conduct must be serious, illegal or make continued work impossible; mere locking of reception not ipso facto termination. Suspension – requirement of service/acknowledgement. Abscondment – employee’s failure to attend reconciliation/open office may amount to abscondment. Property – recovery ordered where items identified on balance of probabilities.
27 July 2018
Withheld annual leave amounted to constructive dismissal; suspension and dismissal were unlawful.
Employment law — constructive dismissal under s.65(1)(c) — denial of statutory annual leave (s.54) can amount to fundamental breach; supervisor's official misconduct constitutes employer conduct; procedural fairness (s.66) required for suspension/dismissal; remedies: leave pay, pay in lieu of notice, reimbursement of salary loan, severance, general damages; interest ordered.
20 July 2018
Unlawful termination without required hearing breaches Employment Act; limited damages awarded due to lack of proof of renewed contract.
Employment law – contract renewal – insufficiency of evidence of signed renewed contract and terms; Unlawful termination – failure to give reasons and to conduct disciplinary hearing – sections 66 and 68 Employment Act; Burden of proof in ex parte proceedings; Remedies – limited damages where contractual terms unproven.
20 July 2018
Dismissal for unauthorized use of employer vehicles upheld despite procedural defects; respondent ordered to pay four weeks' net pay.
Employment law – disciplinary dismissal – misuse of employer property – abuse of office; conflict of interest disclosure – nature and form of disclosure required; procedural fairness – adequate notice and disclosure of investigation report; presence of investigator/legal advisor on disciplinary committee; statutory remedy under section 66(4) for failure to comply with hearing notice requirements.
13 July 2018
Substantive misconduct justified dismissal, but inadequate notice entitled the claimant to four weeks’ net pay.
* Employment law – disciplinary procedure – adequacy of notice and access to investigation report – procedural fairness; * Misconduct – abuse of office – use of employer vehicles for private purposes; * Conflict of interest – disclosure obligations and lack of evidence of fraud/influence peddling; * Role of investigator/legal advisor on disciplinary committee – bias and prejudice; * Remedies – section 66(4) Employment Act – four weeks’ net pay for procedural non-compliance.
13 July 2018
Acquittal on appeal does not automatically entitle a reinstated public officer to back pay for lawful imprisonment.
Public service remuneration – imprisonment and suspension of pay – Public Service Standing Orders Chapter B-a(1),(12); Employment Act 2000 s.41(5) – effect of conviction and later acquittal on entitlement to back pay – Regulation 29(3) Public Service Commission Regulations – remedy by malicious prosecution claim.
6 July 2018
Whether contractual "long service awards" create a binding entitlement to formal recognition and repatriation rights under section 39.
Employment law – interpretation of contractual "long service awards"; whether "may qualify" is discretionary or binding; Labour Officer's power to award remedies; Employment Act s.39 – repatriation entitlement (place of work to home; 100 km threshold); burden of proof in arbitration proceedings; remedies for breach of contractual recognition.
6 July 2018
A neighbouring district Labour Officer may validly refer a dispute where no designated district officer exists; objection overruled.
Employment law – Jurisdiction of Labour Officers – Section 9 Employment Act – Commissioner’s powers to act as Labour Officer – Geographic demarcation administrative – Validity of complaints lodged in neighbouring district – Forum shopping
6 July 2018
May 2018
Fixed-term vocational contracts expired lawfully; claimants failed to prove continuous service or entitlement to terminal benefits or pension.
Employment law — Fixed-term temporary contracts — "Vocational Employment Offers" (3–6 months) — Continuous service under s.83 Employment Act — Termination by expiry under s.65(1)(b) — Seasonal employment s.86 — Validity of contract terms under s.4(a) Employment Act and s.19(1)(a) Contracts Act — Pension entitlement under Pensions Act/Article 254.
18 May 2018
Termination without notice or hearing was unlawful; individual board members were held personally liable and damages awarded.
Employment law – unfair and unlawful termination for lack of notice and disciplinary hearing; Community Based Organisation (C.B.O.) lacks legal personality to be sued; board members personally liable where they have not formally ceased membership and allow an agent to act on their behalf; remedies: payment in lieu of notice, statutory severance, general damages and interest.
11 May 2018
April 2018
Where an employment contract is silent, an employer cannot terminate by relying on an unproved retirement policy; statutory notice is required.
Employment law – termination for alleged retirement age; contractual silence on retirement – employer must prove incorporated policy; re-organisation termination – statutory notice under s.81 required; remedies: pay in lieu of notice, repatriation, interest.
13 April 2018
A stay pending appeal requires a valid timely notice of appeal, proof of substantial loss and provision of security; conditional stay granted upon deposit.
Stay of execution – pending appeal – requirement of valid timely notice of appeal (Rule 23 and Court of Appeal Rules r.76(2)) – need to show substantial loss – requirement to provide security or deposit – discretionary conditional stay.
13 April 2018
Whether a casual worker had continuous engagement converting employment status and whether termination was proved.
Employment law – Casual employment – Whether casual worker converted to non-casual by continuous engagement under reg 39 (Employment Regulations 2011); Proof required to establish continuous engagement and termination; Burden on claimant to prove termination and entitlement to statutory remedies.
6 April 2018
Claimant was a casual worker, failed to prove continuous employment or termination, so claim dismissed.
Employment law – casual worker versus salaried employee – continuous engagement under Regulation 39 (Employment Regulations 2011) – burden on claimant to prove non-casual status and termination – entitlement to statutory protections (notice, hearing, severance, leave).
6 April 2018
March 2018
Claim against individual trustees struck out; contract attestation and lack of work permit do not bar claimant's substantive claim.
Preliminary objections – pleadings and cause of action – striking out defendants; Employment law – attestation of contracts for foreign nationals – requirement repealed by Employment Act 2006; Immigration/work permits – employer’s duty to procure permit, estoppel and contra proferentem.
26 March 2018
Court refused to strike out the respondent's defence, finding its reply addressed allegations and protecting the right to be heard.
Labour procedure – preliminary points of law – frivolous and vexatious pleadings – Order 6 rules 8, 10 and 30 CPR – evasive denials discouraged – right to be heard – refusal to strike out defence or enter judgment without full hearing.
26 March 2018
Stay pending appeal against a preliminary jurisdictional ruling refused; Rule 23 construed to permit appeal from final, not preliminary, decisions.
* Labour law – jurisdiction – preliminary objections – whether Rule 23 permits appeal as of right against preliminary rulings. * Interpretation – Rule 23 read with section 8(2) Labour Disputes (Arbitration and Settlement) Act 2006 – obligation to dispose without undue delay. * Civil procedure – stay of proceedings – appeals from interim or preliminary decisions and effect on court backlog.
26 March 2018
February 2018
Termination was unlawful due to flawed disciplinary process and employer failed to prove negligence by the ATC.
Employment law – unfair dismissal; procedural fairness – suspension duration and right to a hearing (Employment Act ss.63, 66, 68); Civil Aviation – ATC duties vs pilot responsibilities for VFR ‘see-and-avoid’ separation; remedies – damages, severance, terminal benefits, NSSF remittance, certificates, interest.
23 February 2018
January 2018
Minor rephrasing of pleadings to comply with court rules is not a substantive amendment requiring leave; objection overruled.
Civil procedure – Pleadings – Order 6 Rule 19 CPR – distinction between substantive amendment and mere rephrasing/re‑paragrap hing; Industrial Court procedure – compliance with Rule 5 when transferring pleadings from High Court; expungement sought for alleged unpleaded matters.
19 January 2018
Claimant unlawfully dismissed; employer failed statutory procedures; claimant awarded wages, severance and damages.
Labour law – employment relationship – proof of employment by documents and signatures; unlawful dismissal – failure to follow sections 66 and 68 Employment Act 2006; entitlement to wage arrears under section 41; severance under section 87(a); overtime claim dismissed for lack of evidence; interest on awards.
19 January 2018
Appeal against an ex parte Labour Officer award was premature; party must first apply to set aside the ex parte decision.
Labour law – appeals from Labour Officer decisions – ex parte awards – procedural remedy to set aside ex parte decisions before appealing to Industrial Court; Employment Act s.94; Civil Procedure Rules Order 9 r.27.
19 January 2018
Council validly revised retirement formula; claimant’s benefits were correctly calculated and claim dismissed.
Labour law – retirement benefits – whether employer may vary in‑house retirement formula by council resolution; contractual versus discretionary benefits; applicability of council minutes to retired employee; evidence of staff representation and notice.
12 January 2018
Summary dismissal substantively justified for insubordination but procedurally unfair; four weeks’ pay awarded.
Labour law – summary dismissal – willful insubordination for unauthorised entry onto airside – substantive justification under s.69(3); procedural fairness – employer’s failure to comply with s.66 entitles employee to four weeks’ net pay under s.66(4).
12 January 2018
Dismissal for storekeeper negligence was substantively justified but procedurally unfair, entitling claimant only to four weeks' pay and a service certificate.
Employment law – summary dismissal – misconduct by storekeeper allowing excess goods to be loaded and sold – substantive justification under s69(3) of the Employment Act; Procedural fairness – failure to comply with s66 (no summons, unsigned minutes, no chosen representative) – remedy under s66(4) limited to four weeks' net pay; entitlement to certificate of service.
12 January 2018
Court held renewals are separate contracts for notice, distinguished gratuity from termination grant, and limited repatriation and other awards.
Employment law – termination during restructuring – treatment of successive fixed-term contract renewals for notice – distinction between contractual gratuity and staff-regulation termination grant – repatriation entitlement under section 39 (100 km rule and 10-year service) – requirement to prove request/denial of leave for payment in lieu – severance under section 87 not automatic for lawful restructuring dismissals – Labour Officer’s lack of power to award interest.
12 January 2018