|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| February 2024 |
|
|
Court finds plaintiffs lawful customary occupants; orders joint survey, injunction and UGX 80,000,000 damages; titles not cancelled.
Land law – customary Bibanja occupancy – lawful/bona fide occupant under Land Act s.29; sale by heir without compensating or offering first option to occupants; effect of multiple magistrates' suits and res judicata; impeachment/cancellation of registered title – insufficient evidence under Registration of Titles Act s.59; remedy – joint survey (Land Act s.36), permanent injunction, damages.
|
29 February 2024 |
|
Tenant‑by‑occupancy entitled to interest under s.36 sale agreement; joint survey and transfer ordered; counterclaim dismissed.
Land law — Tenant by occupancy — Sale agreement under s.36 Land Act — mutual agreement to subdivide — joint survey and registration required; Specific performance/equitable remedy for purchaser; Disputed payments via agent/surveyor — issues of authorization and proof; Purchaser via agent — necessity to join the principal; Advocate holding title in representative capacity — no personal liability.
|
29 February 2024 |
|
The court held the Kibanja part of the deceased’s estate, the custodian’s sale void, and subsequent purchasers trespassers, awarding eviction, damages and costs.
Land law; intestate succession; evidential burden; custodian cannot transfer title; sale void ab initio; duty of due diligence for purchasers; bona fide purchaser doctrine; trespass; declaratory reliefs; eviction; injunction; general damages; interest and costs.
|
28 February 2024 |
|
A suit was dismissed for non-service of summons, rendering ancillary applications moot and with no order for costs.
Civil procedure – Service of summons – Order 5 rule 2 Civil Procedure Rules – Dismissal of suit for failure to serve summons – Effect on ancillary applications.
|
27 February 2024 |
|
The surviving plaintiff was allowed to proceed with the suit and amend pleadings after the co-plaintiff's death.
Civil procedure – death of plaintiff – survival of cause of action – amendment of plaint – Order 24 rule 2 of Civil Procedure Rules – substitution of parties – continuation of suit by surviving party
|
26 February 2024 |
|
A surviving plaintiff may continue a land suit after the death of a joint plaintiff; the plaint can be amended accordingly.
Civil procedure – death of party – survivorship of cause of action – amendment of plaint – Order 24 rule 2 and Order 6 rule 19 – interpretation and application – procedural requirements for continuing suit after co-plaintiff’s death.
|
26 February 2024 |
|
Court recorded a plaintiff's death and allowed the land suit to continue with the surviving plaintiff, ordering amendment of the plaint.
Land law – civil procedure – survival of cause of action where a co-plaintiff dies – Order 24 r.2 CPR; Amendment of pleadings – Order 6 r.19 CPR – removal of deceased plaintiff from plaint; Proof of death by death certificate; Procedural burden to deny facts in affidavits; Costs in the cause.
|
26 February 2024 |
|
Les pendens rule not engaged where causes of action and parties differ; application to dismiss later suit dismissed.
Civil procedure – Les pendens – Requirement of same cause of action and same parties – Different causes and additional parties negate les pendens; consolidation appropriate to prevent multiplicity of suits.
|
26 February 2024 |
|
Appellants' long possession alone did not establish customary ownership; respondent-administrator entitled to sue for trespass.
Land law – Kibanja (customary holding); proof of ownership; mere long possession not proof of customary tenure; trespass and eviction; administrator's locus to sue; effect of prior dismissed will-based suit.
|
26 February 2024 |
|
Court granted stay pending appeal after finding applicant had locus, showed imminent irreparable harm, and ordered security.
Civil procedure – stay of execution pending appeal – conditions (notice of appeal; risk of substantial loss; no unreasonable delay; security) – locus to sue by administrator/beneficiary – curable procedural error under Article 126.
|
23 February 2024 |
|
Suit abated for failure to take out summons for directions; dismissal for want of prosecution inapplicable without scheduling conference.
Civil procedure – abatement of suit – failure to take out summons for directions – Order 11A rule 1(2) C.P.R.;* Civil procedure – dismissal for want of prosecution – Order 17 rule 5 requires mandatory scheduling conference before six‑month period runs;* Civil procedure – exception under Order 11A rule 4(b) requires a formal application under Order 6 rules 29 & 30 or Order 15 rule 2;* Costs – awarded to respondents who raised the preliminary objection.
|
22 February 2024 |
|
Revision application dismissed as incompetent for being premised on an unsigned, unsealed notice of motion; respondent’s late affidavit struck out.
Civil procedure – Revision of magistrate’s ruling – Distress for rent – Timelines for affidavits in reply (Order 8 r1(2)) – Affidavit filed out of time struck out – Notice of motion/summons must be signed and sealed (Order 5 r1(5)) – Failure to sign/seal is a fundamental defect rendering application incompetent.
|
21 February 2024 |
|
|
21 February 2024 |
|
Application to ratify a survey and obtain title dismissed as an abuse of process because related matters are pending in the Family Division.
Land law – enforcement of consent judgment – application to ratify land survey and obtain certificate of title. Civil procedure – jurisdiction and lis pendens – matters transferred to Family Division; risk of conflicting orders. Abuse of process – subsequent proceedings and pending challenges to letters of administration and consent judgment preclude relief in this division.
|
19 February 2024 |
|
The applicant’s review of an appellate High Court decision was procedurally improper and dismissed; review must be to the court that made the order.
Civil procedure – Review of judgment – Section 82(a) Civil Procedure Act; Order 46 CPR – review must be to court which made the order; appellate court cannot review its own appellate decision; error apparent on face of record; procedural impropriety; locus/party status.
|
19 February 2024 |
|
Plaintiffs failed to prove kibanja interests; consent decree and eviction were irregular; tainted title cancelled and BLB ordered to re-survey and reallocate.
Land law – equitable (kibanja) interests – burden and standard of proof; fraud in land registration and consent decrees – nullity of eviction where occupiers were not heard; duties of purchaser’s due diligence; remedial orders – cancellation of tainted title, survey and reallocation by Controlling Authority; award of punitive damages for irregular eviction.
|
19 February 2024 |
|
An LC III court lacked jurisdiction to determine a dispute over registered land; its orders were set aside on revision.
Local Council Courts – jurisdiction; LC III lacked first-instance jurisdiction over dispute concerning registered land; Certificate of title – conclusive evidence of title (Registration of Titles Act s59); High Court revisionary powers under Judicature Act s17 and LCCA s40.
|
15 February 2024 |
|
Stay of an order for security for costs dismissed for lack of realistic prospect of success, imminent execution, and security for due performance.
Land procedure – security for costs under Order 26 CPR – application for stay of execution pending appeal – conditions for stay: notice of appeal, no undue delay, likelihood of success, imminent execution, security for due performance, balance of convenience – misinterpretation of security order (failure to furnish leads to dismissal not eviction).
|
15 February 2024 |
|
Stay of execution pending appeal refused where applicants failed to meet statutory requirements, including provision of security for due performance.
Civil Procedure – Stay of Execution – Security for Costs – Injunctive Relief – Requirements for Stay Pending Appeal – Noncompliance with Security for Due Performance – Balance of Convenience – Irreparable Harm – High Court Procedure
|
15 February 2024 |
|
Court declares plaintiff owner, cancels fraudulently acquired title, denies purchaser bona fide status, awards injunction and damages.
Land law – Ownership and possession – Whether land formed part of deceased's estate and occupier's rights. Registration of Titles – Indefeasibility and fraud – registration procured with knowledge of prior unregistered interest is impeachable. Bona fide purchaser doctrine – purchaser must make reasonable inquiries of occupants; registry search alone may be insufficient. Remedies – declaration of ownership, cancellation of title under the RTA, perpetual injunction, general damages and costs.
|
13 February 2024 |
|
Filing a reply relinquishes the right to amend without leave; amended plaint filed without leave struck out with costs.
Civil Procedure – Amendment of pleadings – Order 6 rule 20; Order 8 rule 18(1) & (2). Amendment without leave permitted once within timelines; filing a reply precludes further amendment without leave. Pleadings filed without required leave are irregular and may be struck out.
|
13 February 2024 |
|
Application to vacate caveats dismissed because caveators must be joined and heard before vacatur.
Land law – Caveats – Effect and protection of caveats; beneficiary caveat (s.140(2) Registration of Titles Act) – Does not lapse except by court order or withdrawal – Right to be heard and joinder of caveators before vacatur of caveat – Fair hearing principles.
|
12 February 2024 |
|
An order rejecting and striking out a plaint that conclusively determines rights is a decree appealable as of right; leave was unnecessary.
Civil procedure — Rejection of plaint — Whether striking out a plaint for non‑disclosure of cause of action constitutes a decree appealable as of right — Distinction between decree and order — Abuse of court process where appeal already filed — Preliminary objections to affidavits (timing and authority).
|
12 February 2024 |
|
Applicant entitled to consequential rectification of title under s.177 after recovering land by court judgment.
Land law – Registration of Titles Act s.177 – High Court power to cancel and substitute certificate of title upon recovery by court proceedings. Consequential orders – purpose is to give effect to judgment and rectify register. Proof required – applicant must show land was recovered from person registered as proprietor (Re Ivan Mutaka). Uncontested application – court may act on unchallenged affidavit evidence.
|
12 February 2024 |
|
Court dismissed stay application, finding applicants lacked standing and review of the appellate judgment was procedurally improper.
Stay of execution; Order 22 r.23 inapplicable to third parties; inherent powers to stay execution; review of appellate judgments impermissible; locus/standing of clan members; alternative remedy — objector proceedings.
|
12 February 2024 |
|
Applicants granted leave to defend summary suit after showing bona fide triable issues on title and sale agreement.
Civil Procedure — Summary procedure (Order 36) — Leave to appear and defend — Defendant must show a bona fide triable issue of fact or law with sufficient disclosure of the nature and grounds of the defence. Contract/Property — Privity of contract and enforceability of sale agreements — Suit for recovery/enforcement of land interests may raise triable issues unsuitable for summary disposal. Evidence/Title — Issues of notice of existing interests and competing title are triable and not properly resolved on summary judgment.
|
12 February 2024 |
|
Applicant's delay after counsel's mistake barred setting aside of dismissal and ex parte counterclaim judgment.
Civil procedure — setting aside dismissal (s.98 CPA; Order 9 r.23 CPR) — sufficient cause; negligence of counsel — inordinate delay defeats equity — counterclaim independent; ex parte judgment not set aside where applicant fails to appear and delays relief.
|
12 February 2024 |
|
Substituted service by newspaper allowed where personal service impossible; costs to be in the main cause.
Civil Procedure – Service of process – Order 5 Rule 18 CPR – substituted service where personal service impracticable; service by publication in newspaper of wide circulation; sufficiency of process server’s affidavit; costs in main cause.
|
12 February 2024 |
|
Plaintiff established ownership and 4th defendant’s trespass; alleged vendor fraud was not proved.
Land law – proof of ownership by sale agreement and LC1 – Unchallenged evidence accepted; Trespass – unlawful occupation and construction – Remedies: declaration, injunction, vacant possession, damages and costs; Pleading and proof of fraud – particulars required and strict proof standard; Burden of proof under section 103 Evidence Act; Failure to defend imputes admission.
|
2 February 2024 |
|
Vesting orders under s.166 require full investigation; disputed title cannot be resolved on affidavit application and is dismissed.
Land law – Registration of Titles Act (s.166) – Vesting orders – requirements for granting a vesting order – court’s investigative role and necessity of certainty before conferring proprietary interests. Civil procedure – application vs ordinary suit – where factual disputes and multiple claimants exist, title should be determined by an ordinary action, not interlocutory vesting application. Evidentiary standard – affidavits insufficient to resolve complex historical ownership disputes. Procedural irregularity – ex parte heading and lack of proof of service noted.
|
1 February 2024 |