HC: Land Division (Uganda)

The Land Division is a Division created at the High Court Head office at Kampala.

The Division is charged with the following functions:Responsibility of supervising the work of Land Tribunals, the adjudication of all land related dispute fall under this Division. The land Division is established with three judges with a separate registry for the Division .There is a Registrar for the Land Division who doubles as the Registrar of the Land Tribunals. A desk office was also established under the office of the Registrar to handle the activities of the District Land Tribunals.

 

Physical address
Twed Towers, along Kafu Road, Nakasero, Kampala.
7 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
7 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 2019
A Kibanja (equitable) interest does not suffice to obtain consequential transfer of registered title under section 177.
Registration of Titles Act s.177; consequential orders to cancel or substitute entries in the register; requirement of recovery of land, estate or interest from registered proprietor; Kibanja (equitable) interest v. legal registered (mailo) interest; unsuccessful litigant cannot convert a Kibanja decree into registered title without proving recovery of the registered estate.
27 December 2019
Appeal dismissed: failure to pursue available remedies and filing parallel suit amounted to abuse of process; execution allowed.
Civil procedure – summary judgment and execution – stay of execution – requirement to pursue leave to appeal or reinstatement of dismissed application – abuse of process by filing parallel proceedings.
18 December 2019
Application to amend defence and add counterclaim dismissed; late reply struck out and suit to proceed on existing pleadings.
Civil procedure – Amendment of pleadings – Order 6 r.19 CPR – court’s discretion to allow amendments; requirements: no prejudice, not mala fide, not alter cause of action fundamentally. Civil procedure – Pleadings – late affidavit in reply struck out for being filed without leave and out of time. Civil law – Counterclaim – cannot introduce a cause of action aiming to challenge or undo a criminal conviction that has not been set aside on appeal.
18 December 2019
A prematurely dismissed suit under Order 17 Rule 6(1) CPR may be reinstated by the High Court exercising its inherent jurisdiction.
Civil procedure – Reinstatement of suit dismissed under Order 17 Rule 6(1) CPR – Premature dismissal where last action < two years – Inherent jurisdiction and Section 98 CPA to reinstate – Order 17 Rule 6(2) (fresh suit) not absolute – Costs against respondent who occasioned dismissal
18 December 2019
Court allowed amendment to plaint to clarify conversion claim; ownership dispute to be proved in the main suit.
Civil procedure – Amendment of pleadings under Order 6 r.19 – adequacy of affidavit support; amendment to correct nature of cause of action (lease extension vs conversion to freehold) – prejudice to respondent; amendments to determine real questions in controversy and avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
15 December 2019
Grade One Magistrates may hear land recovery claims but cannot cancel title; case transferred due to pecuniary jurisdiction limits.
Civil procedure – jurisdiction – Magistrates’ Courts’ power to hear land recovery claims despite inability to order cancellation of title; cancellation of certificate of title is exclusive to the High Court (Registration of Titles Act s.177). Civil procedure – pecuniary limits – Grade One Magistrate lacks jurisdiction where plaint values subject matter above Ugx.20,000,000. Civil procedure – transfer of proceedings – transfer to competent Magistrate Court where original filing court or presiding officer lacks jurisdiction. Evidence – procedural compliance – out-of-time affidavit struck off; inadequate excuse of deponent being abroad.
5 December 2019
Buyer’s claim failed: no proven oral term, delivery delayed by interlocutory injunction, contract not frustrated; suit dismissed with costs.
Land law – sale by foreclosure; delivery of vacant possession – timing of performance where contract silent; Evidence Act s.92 and four-corners rule; reasonable time under Contracts Act; frustration of contract; purchaser’s due diligence; interim injunction as cause for non-delivery.
3 December 2019