HC: Land Division (Uganda)

The Land Division is a Division created at the High Court Head office at Kampala.

The Division is charged with the following functions:Responsibility of supervising the work of Land Tribunals, the adjudication of all land related dispute fall under this Division. The land Division is established with three judges with a separate registry for the Division .There is a Registrar for the Land Division who doubles as the Registrar of the Land Tribunals. A desk office was also established under the office of the Registrar to handle the activities of the District Land Tribunals.

 

Physical address
Twed Towers, along Kafu Road, Nakasero, Kampala.
11 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
11 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
February 2016
A valid repossession certificate under the EPA sustains a lawful lease extension; collateral trespass claims fail absent successful appeal.
Land law – Expropriated Properties Act – repossession letter vs repossession certificate; Minister’s decision and finality; Regulation 13 – deemed extension of expired leases; agency and management of repossessed property; remedy by appeal vs collateral challenge in trespass action.
29 February 2016
Plaintiff’s registered title upheld; defendants failed to prove fraud, held trespassers; injunction and damages awarded.
Land law – conversion of customary tenure to freehold and certificate of title – allegation of fraud in acquisition of title – proof and standard for fraud; Land law – competing customary interests and compulsory proof of occupation; Land surveying – alleged overlap of registered parcels – expert survey evidence; Tort – trespass to land and vicarious liability of principal for agents’ acts; Remedies – declaratory relief, permanent injunction, special and general damages, interest and costs.
26 February 2016
Defendants declared bona fide occupants; plaintiff’s eviction and injunction claims dismissed.
Land Law – trespass – limitation of claim to registered plot; Kibanja (customary tenancy) – burden and nature of proof; Bona fide occupant – security of occupancy where uninterrupted occupation predates 1995 Constitution; Eviction – cannot be ordered under section 31(1) against bona fide occupants, remedy under section 31(7).
26 February 2016
The appeal was dismissed: the registered proprietor's entry onto the statutory tenant's kibanja amounted to trespass, justifying damages and injunction.
Civil procedure – res judicata: earlier suit did not finally decide respondent's claim against the appellant; res judicata not established; Evidence – appellate re-evaluation: trial magistrate entitled to prefer respondent's evidence supported by busuulu receipts and physical indicators; Land law – kibanja and busuulu: payments and possession evidence relevant to extent of tenant's kibanja; Land law – mailo title vs statutory tenant: registered proprietor's unauthorised entry can constitute trespass where tenant has statutory protection of physical possession; Remedies – trespass: award of general damages and permanent injunction appropriate where landlord unlawfully cleared crops and built on tenant's possession.
12 February 2016
Plaintiffs failed to prove customary ownership; registered proprietor lawfully entitled to possession and purchaser held bona fide title.
Land law – custom and customary tenure – proof of customary rights; Registration of title – allegation of fraud must be pleaded and strictly proved; Bona fide purchaser – purchaser for value without notice obtains indefeasible title; Remedies – dismissal of claim, counterclaim succeeds, eviction, permanent injunction, award of general damages; Burden and standard of proof – civil standard, higher for fraud.
9 February 2016
Civil Procedure|Actions and applications|Orders
9 February 2016
A registered company retains locus standi to sue; internal disputes over share transfers must be raised in the main suit.
Company law – Separate legal personality of a limited liability company – Capacity and locus standi to sue – Internal disputes over share transfers and administration are to be determined in the substantive action, not by interlocutory dismissal applications.
8 February 2016
Court permits substantive fraud allegations to be litigated with proper pleadings, not barred by res judicata, and stays execution.
Civil procedure – res judicata – where prior decisions addressed procedural points, res judicata inapplicable; Consent judgments – setting aside for fraud requires strict pleading and higher standard of proof; Affidavit and police report attachment insufficient to prove fraud; Proper pleadings and evidence required; Stay of execution of decree pending full hearing on fraud.
5 February 2016
Kibanja can support a caveat, but a caveat covering the whole title when the claim is to part is invalid.
Land law – Caveats – Registrable interest – Kibanja as proprietary/customary interest capable of supporting a caveat. Caveat validity – A caveat cannot bar dealings over an entire registered parcel where the caveator’s claim is only to part; such a defect is fundamental and requires striking out. Procedure – Irregular procedural form of interlocutory application not automatically fatal where no prejudice results.
5 February 2016
Whether plaintiffs’ un-compensated kibanja was trespassed upon by the defendant, entitling them to compensation and damages.
Land law – Mailo title versus kibanja (tenant) interests – proof of occupation and compensation. Evidence – Weight and admissibility of forensic document analysis; preference for oral and corroborative local evidence when forensic findings are inconclusive. Remedies – Monetary compensation for loss of land interest, destruction of crops and trespass; costs and interest.
4 February 2016
Appellant’s registered title was displaced by respondents’ proven customary/adverse possession; appeal dismissed with costs.
Land law – customary tenure and adverse possession – evidential proof of non‑titled, customary ownership; Certificate of Title under s.59 RTA – conclusive evidence but defeasible where title relates to different land; bona fide purchaser – duty of due diligence beyond registry search; locus visit – discretionary, not mandatory; appellate re-evaluation of evidence.
1 February 2016