HC: Land Division (Uganda)

The Land Division is a Division created at the High Court Head office at Kampala.

The Division is charged with the following functions:Responsibility of supervising the work of Land Tribunals, the adjudication of all land related dispute fall under this Division. The land Division is established with three judges with a separate registry for the Division .There is a Registrar for the Land Division who doubles as the Registrar of the Land Tribunals. A desk office was also established under the office of the Registrar to handle the activities of the District Land Tribunals.

 

Physical address
Twed Towers, along Kafu Road, Nakasero, Kampala.
9 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
9 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
April 2013
A single joint administrator cannot validly sue alone to remove a caveat; such an application is a nullity.
Succession Act s.264 – joint administrators’ authority; Caveat removal – necessity to annex the caveat and supporting affidavit; Failure to join co‑administrator renders proceedings a nullity; Non‑reply by caveator does not discharge applicant’s burden of proof; Title disputes – remedy by plaint/action rather than summary application.
29 April 2013
Ministerial interference in a pending land suit was unlawful and prohibited to protect the court's jurisdiction and status quo.
Judicial review — Prohibition — Ministerial interference in pending litigation — Sub-judice rule — Ultra vires actions — Protection of status quo pending determination by court.
26 April 2013
Applicant estopped from impugning consent judgment; execution was unlawful but restitution denied due to delay and changed circumstances.
Civil procedure – Joinder of parties and consent judgments; estoppel and finality of consent decrees absent fraud/misapprehension; execution – warrant must conform to decree; unlawful eviction – setting aside execution; remedies – restitution refused for laches and changed circumstances.
26 April 2013
Failure to extract a formal decree does not render an appeal incompetent; substantive justice prevails over technicalities.
Magistrates Courts Act s.220(1)(a) – extraction of decree – Article 126(2)(e) Constitution – substantive justice over technicalities – Court of Appeal authority: decree extraction a mere technicality – Order 21 r.7(3) CPR – magistrate’s duty to draw decree – preliminary objection on competency of appeal overruled.
18 April 2013
Court denied statutory compensation for unproven losses but awarded UGX15,000,000 general damages and costs for wrongful caveat.
* Property law – Registration of Titles Act s.142 – liability for lodging caveat without reasonable cause – compensation requires proof of damages. * Civil procedure – burden to plead and prove damages; court will not award compensation absent cogent evidence. * Damages – general damages for inconvenience, loss of use and distress caused by wrongful caveat. * Costs – withdrawal of caveat after commencement of suit does not defeat award of costs.
18 April 2013
Court refused applicant’s interim injunction; status quo and balance of convenience favoured respondents in possession.
Civil procedure — temporary injunction — requirements: pending suit; prima facie case; irreparable injury; balance of convenience; status quo preservation where respondents are in actual occupation of disputed land; damages as adequate remedy for livelihood-related activities.
18 April 2013
Plaintiff owns kibanja; 1st–3rd defendants trespassed and must pay compensation, damages, mesne profits, interest and costs.
* Land law – kibanja ownership – proof of ownership by agreement and possession; * Trespass – unlawful entry, cutting of trees, grading and dispossession; * Bona fide purchaser – notice and when defence fails; * Remedies – compensation for land and trees, general damages, mesne profits, interest and costs; * Apportionment of liability – active trespassers vs prior registered proprietor.
18 April 2013
Court refused to review a consent judgment and allowed execution and sale after the applicant defaulted.
Land law – consent judgment – review/rescission of consent decree – misrepresentation must affect state of mind at execution to set aside consent; consent judgment supersedes original cause of action; execution and sale permissible where party defaults.
9 April 2013
A magistrate lacked pecuniary jurisdiction over a UGX 280M land dispute; resulting judgment declared a nullity and set aside.
* Civil procedure – Revision under section 83 CPA and Order 52 CPR – Jurisdictional review of magistrate's judgment * Magistrates’ jurisdiction – Section 207 Magistrates Courts Act (Grade I limit UGX 20,000,000) * Valuation – "value of the subject matter" determined by relief sought; powers in perpetuity (joint management, permanent injunction) attract property value * Judgment without jurisdiction – nullity; can be set aside ex debito justitiae
4 April 2013