HC: International Crimes Division (Uganda)

The International Crimes Division is a special Division of High Court of Uganda which was established in July 2008. Hon. Justice James Ogoola a Principal Judge of the High Court as he then was pursuant to Article 141 of the constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995 established War Crimes Division (now THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMES DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT).

Considering the civil wars and a series of other internal conflicts, which Uganda has experienced in the recent past, it decided to establish the ICD to try the perpetrators of war crimes and crimes against humanity including commanders of the LRA and other rebel groups.

Physical address
Plot 8 Mabua Road, Kololo, Kampala- Uganda.
17 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
17 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 2023

 

18 December 2023
Whether customary international law permits prosecution and whether a prima facie case exists against the accused.
* International humanitarian law – non‑international armed conflict threshold – intensity, duration, organisation of non‑state armed group;* Crimes against humanity – applicability as customary international law/jus cogens and non‑retroactivity (principle of legality);* No‑case‑to‑answer standard – prima facie evidence required to call accused to defence;* Specific evidential elements – hostage‑taking (intent to obtain advantage), murder, kidnapping, procuration of unlawful carnal knowledge;* Procedural issues – duplicative counts and acquittal where essential elements lacking.
18 December 2023
Bail refused due to grave trafficking/defilement charges, risk of absconding and likely witness intimidation.
Criminal procedure – Bail – Discretion under Article 23(6)(a) and Sections 14–15 Trial on Indictments Act; exceptional circumstances; substantial sureties; gravity of offence (aggravated trafficking in children — death penalty); risk of absconding and witness intimidation; multiple indictments; readiness for trial.
8 December 2023
Technical errors in an indictment do not nullify charges; evidence sufficiently established aggravated child trafficking and charges were confirmed.
Criminal procedure – Confirmation of charges – "Substantial grounds to believe" standard; Trafficking in persons – Aggravated trafficking of a child – elements: receipt/harbouring, child status, deception/abuse of vulnerability, sexual exploitation; Indictment irregularity – drafting error not fatal where no prejudice.
8 December 2023
November 2023
Court confirmed charges, finding substantial grounds to believe accused committed aggravated child trafficking and aggravated defilement.
* Confirmation of charges – pre‑trial standard – substantial grounds to believe (Rome Statute/ICC standard) applied by ICD. * Trafficking in persons – aggravated trafficking in children – elements: act, means, purpose, participation, aggravating factor of child; Section 3(3) obviates proving means where victim is a child. * Aggravated defilement – proof of sexual act and age – medical and testimonial evidence acceptable to establish victim's age. * Consent irrelevant where victim is a child under PTIPA.
20 November 2023
Court applied the ICC 'substantial grounds' standard and confirmed child trafficking and aggravated defilement charges against the accused.
Confirmation of charges – pre-trial standard: substantial grounds to believe (Rome Statute Art.61(7)) applied; Aggravated trafficking in children (PTIPA s.3/5) – receipt/harbouring of a child for sexual exploitation; Section 3(3) PTIPA: child-victim exception to proving means; Aggravated defilement (Penal Code) – sexual act on child under 14; Victim’s testimony and medical report (old ruptured hymen) sufficient at confirmation; Minor inconsistencies do not preclude confirmation.
9 November 2023
September 2023
Court dismissed application to stay trial, finding the constitutional challenge lacked likelihood of success and restricted disclosure orders were lawful.
* Constitutional law – Stay of proceedings – Criteria for grant: likelihood of success, irreparable harm, balance of convenience. * Criminal procedure – Pre-trial disclosure – Prima facie right to disclosure limited where State adduces evidence of need for witness protection, state secrets or informer identity protection; trial court’s discretion. * International Crimes Division Rules – Redaction and restricted disclosure permissible where they align with Constitutional Court guidance. * Duplication of proceedings – Concurrent trials on same facts may violate Article 28, but questions of consolidation/joinder are case-specific and previously determined rulings are binding.
25 September 2023
July 2023
An accused who deliberately absconds after bail waives the right to be present and trial may proceed in his absence.
Criminal procedure – trial in absence – accused who absconds waives right to be present – Article 28(5) Constitution, Judicature Act and ICD Rules – public interest and fairness to victims and co-accused justify proceeding.
18 July 2023
May 2023
Court confirmed trafficking, terrorism and support charges but dismissed terrorist-financing counts for lack of evidence.
International Crimes Division jurisdiction; pre-trial confirmation standard – ‘substantial grounds to believe’ (Rome Statute); aggravated trafficking in children; terrorism – unlawful possession of explosive-making materials; belonging to a terrorist organisation; rendering support to terrorists; terrorist financing dismissed for lack of proof of willing provision.
17 May 2023
Pre‑trial court confirmed terrorism charges on substantial grounds based on admissions, witness statements and call data records.
Terrorism — Confirmation of charges — Pre‑trial standard: "substantial grounds to believe" (Rome Statute) — reliance on admissions, witness statements and call data records — International Crimes Division jurisdiction — admissibility/authenticity challenges premature at confirmation stage.
2 May 2023
April 2023
Pre-trial confirmation applied the Rome Statute 'substantial grounds' test, confirming trafficking counts against some accused and dismissing others.
Criminal procedure – International Crimes Division – pre-trial confirmation – Article 61 Rome Statute standard of "substantial grounds to believe" applied; Trafficking in persons – aggravated trafficking in children – elements (recruitment/transport, child status, means, purpose of exploitation); Joint indictment – need for evidence of individual responsibility; Evidential limits of summary/documentary proof at confirmation stage; Dismissal/striking out of counts unsupported by summary or repetitive counts.
17 April 2023
Insufficient, inconsistent evidence and investigative gaps meant no prima facie case; accused acquitted on all counts.
Criminal procedure — s.73 Trial on Indictments Act — prima facie case; Trafficking in persons — elements: recruitment/coercion, exploitation, parental control; Forgery — falsity of document’s nature versus content; Uttering false documents — need to prove accused knowingly used forged documents; Evidence — material inconsistencies, lack of corroboration, inadequate investigation.
13 April 2023
A proved amnesty for crimes committed in furtherance of war extinguishes criminal charges; indictment struck out.
Amnesty – effect of pardon on prosecutions – Amnesty Act scope for crimes committed in furtherance of war or rebellion; Constitutional bar (Article 29(10)) to trying a pardoned person; pre‑trial confirmation standard under Article 61(5) Rome Statute; aggravated trafficking in children and membership of a terrorist organisation considered within amnesty where committed in furtherance of rebellion.
13 April 2023
Whether prosecution’s pre‑trial disclosure established substantial grounds that the accused committed terrorism and trafficking offences.
International Crimes Division — Pre‑trial confirmation — substantial grounds standard; Terrorism offences — belonging to listed terrorist organisation; rendering support; terrorist financing (Section 9A) — intent/knowledge; Trafficking in persons — aggravated trafficking, trafficking in children — act, means (deception), purpose (exploitation); Conspiracy to commit trafficking.
4 April 2023
March 2023
Bail refused: applicant’s residences established but sureties found insubstantial, creating high absconding risk.
* Criminal procedure – Bail – Application for bail pending trial on terrorism and murder charges – Requirement to prove exceptional circumstances for specified offences under section 15 TIA – Primary inquiry whether accused is likely to abscond. * Fixed place of abode – evidence from ID, charge sheet and LC1 letters can establish residence. * Sureties – substantiality assessed by relationship, residence, documentary proof and ability to ensure attendance; contradictory or weak sureties may justify refusal of bail. * Consideration of gravity of offence and risk of interference with witnesses under Bail Guidelines and Article 23(6)(a).
28 March 2023
Pre‑trial confirmation: substantial grounds found to believe accused committed aggravated trafficking of a child; charge confirmed and sent for trial.
Criminal procedure – International Crimes Division pre‑trial confirmation – appropriate standard: "substantial grounds to believe" (Rome Statute Article 61) – aggravated trafficking in children (PTP Act 2009) – elements: victim's age, recruitment/harbouring, means/vulnerability, sexual exploitation and accused's participation – child victim: means/consent irrelevant.
20 March 2023
January 2023
Pre-trial charges of ADF membership and aiding terrorism dismissed for lack of substantial grounds to believe the accused committed the offences.
Anti-Terrorism Act (ss.11, 8) – belonging to a listed terrorist organisation; aiding and abetting terrorism – evidentiary requirements; ICD pre-trial standard – application of Rome Statute/ICC "substantial grounds to believe" standard; admissibility/use of charge and caution statements recorded under different statutory provision.
22 January 2023