HC: Family Division (Uganda)

The Family Division was created in  April 2005 as a division of the high court that handles: Administration causes, Family causes, (Adoption, Guardianship, Affiliation/maintenance), Miscellaneous causes, Miscellaneous applications, Civil appeals, Civil suits, Originating summons, Civil revisions and Divorce cases.

Physical address
Makindye Chief Magistrates' Court at Mobutu Road .
4 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
4 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 2015
Family Law
14 December 2015
Application for title changes dismissed as premature; s.177 Registration of Titles Act requires antecedent recovery or estate determination.
* Registration of Titles Act, s.177 – cancellation and substitution of entries in Register Book permissible upon recovery of land; consequential orders altering titles require antecedent recovery or determination of estate extent. * Procedural law – limits on consequential orders from prior declaratory/directive judgments where subject-matter (extent/recovery of land) was not determined. * Locus and standing – power of attorney must confer authority to litigate; institutional claimant distinct from individual attorney. * Advocates Act – proper procedure for recovering taxed costs (issue raised but left moot).
14 December 2015
The applicants were granted legal guardianship of an orphaned infant and permitted to pursue adoption abroad under protective conditions.
Children law – guardianship; welfare principle – best interests paramount; High Court jurisdiction to grant guardianship; cross-border placement and foreign adoption permitted with conditions; reporting, citizenship and religious safeguards.
10 December 2015
Court refused a Children Act search order (not an "approved home") but ordered disclosure of the child's location.
* Children Act – section 62 – search and production/recovery orders available only where child removed from an "approved home". * Children Act – section 41 – power to summon persons withholding child-related information; High Court may exercise inherent and original jurisdiction to order disclosure to avoid multiplicity of proceedings. * Constitutional provisions – parental rights and duty to care; child’s right to know and be cared for by parents. * Evidence – uncontroverted affidavit evidence sufficient to justify disclosure order; lack of reply treated as admission per civil procedure rules.
3 December 2015