Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
English
Kiswahili
English
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Collections
Gazettes
Hansard
African Union and EAC
East African Community (EAC)
East African Court of Justice
East African Court of Appeal
African Court of Human and People's Rights
African Commission on Human and People's Rights
AU Charters and Treaties
Home
Judgments
High Court: Execution and Bailiffs Division (Uganda)
High Court: Execution and Bailiffs Division (Uganda)
Please note: this court does no longer exist, and is preserved here for historical reasons.
2 judgments
Advanced search
All years
2020
2019
2017
2016
2015
2014
All years
2020
2019
2017
2016
2015
2014
All months
March
April
May
June
July
October
November
December
All months
March
April
May
June
July
October
November
December
Filters
Filters
Alphabet
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Sort by:
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
2 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 2016
Combined Properties Ltd v Secretary to Treasury & Anor (Miscellaneous Application No. 1028 of 2016) [2016] UGHCEBD 30 (6 December 2016)
Mandamus denied where procedural irregularities and doubtful service undermined an asserted undisputable right to payment.
Judicature — mandamus — requirement of clear legal right and corresponding duty; procedural regularity and valid service of certificates of order; mandamus will not enforce doubtful or unsupported claims; reliefs must derive from judgment sought to be enforced.
6 December 2016
Vambeco Enterprises v Attorney General & Anor (Miscellaneous Application No. 1224 of 2016) [2016] UGHCEBD 32 (6 December 2016)
Court issued mandamus compelling respondents to pay applicant’s decretal sum with accrued interest and costs.
* Administrative law – mandamus against government – requirements: clear legal right, corresponding duty, omission and lack of adequate alternative remedy. * Government liabilities – payment of decrees against the State via Attorney General/Treasury; verification and Treasury allocations do not negate the statutory duty to pay. * Interest and costs – court ordered accrued interest and taxed costs; continued non‑payment may amount to contempt.
6 December 2016
1
>