Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
English
Kiswahili
English
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Collections
Gazettes
Hansard
African Union and EAC
East African Community (EAC)
East African Court of Justice
East African Court of Appeal
African Court of Human and People's Rights
African Commission on Human and People's Rights
AU Charters and Treaties
Home
Judgments
High Court: Execution and Bailiffs Division (Uganda)
High Court: Execution and Bailiffs Division (Uganda)
Please note: this court does no longer exist, and is preserved here for historical reasons.
4 judgments
Advanced search
All years
2020
2019
2017
2016
2015
2014
All years
2020
2019
2017
2016
2015
2014
All months
March
April
May
June
July
October
November
December
All months
March
April
May
June
July
October
November
December
Filters
Filters
Alphabet
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Sort by:
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
4 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
November 2016
Wamala Growers Cooperative Union v Kiggundu & 22 Ors (Miscellaneous Application No. 760 of 2016) [2016] UGHCEBD 28 (25 November 2016)
Consequential transfer set aside where judgment debt had been paid and the execution sale and registration were procedurally defective.
• Civil procedure – Review of Registrar’s consequential order under execution proceedings – jurisdiction and nullity. • Execution law – Attachment and sale – expiry/renewal of warrant, requirement for re-advertisement, return of warrant and proof of sale. • Registration of Titles – Effect of consequential orders and protection of third-party title; necessity to hear affected parties. • Inherent jurisdiction and procedural regularity – consequences of errors apparent on the face of the record.
25 November 2016
Southern Range Nyanza Ltd v Attorney General & 2 Ors (Miscellaneous Application No. 2157 of 2016) [2016] UGHCEBD 26 (18 November 2016)
Mandamus granted to compel respondents to pay the applicant the VAT refund owed under a consent decree.
Mandamus – grant where just and convenient; Judicature Act s37 – requirements for mandamus (clear right, corresponding duty, omission, lack of alternative); Government Proceedings Act s19 – certificate/order against Government; payment of decrees against Government via Attorney General/Treasury Officer of Accounts; ex parte hearing where respondents served and absent.
18 November 2016
Makaru v Attorney General & Anor (Miscellaneous Application No. 1288 of 2016) [2016] UGHCEBD 29 (11 November 2016)
Court granted mandamus compelling Treasury to pay decretal sum after a duly served certificate of order against Government.
* Public law – Mandamus – Compelling government to satisfy a decree – Certificate of order under s.19 Government Proceedings Act – Requirements for mandamus: clear legal right, corresponding duty, omission, lack of alternative remedy. * Civil enforcement – Payment of judgments against Government – Treasury/Accountant General duty to pay – Failure to pay may constitute contempt of court. * Procedure – Attempted attachment of government property declared illegal – mandamus appropriate where no effective alternative remedy exists.
11 November 2016
Makaru v Attorney General & Anor (Miscellaneous Application No. 1288 of 2016) [2016] UGHCEBD 23 (4 November 2016)
Mandamus granted to compel Treasury to pay a duly certified court decree against the Government; non-payment may be contempt.
* Administrative law – Mandamus – High Court power to compel performance of statutory duty under section 37 Judicature Act; * Government Proceedings – satisfaction of orders against Government – certificate of order under section 19 Government Proceedings Act; * Enforcement of judgment against Government – service of certificate and statutory obligation to pay; * Contempt – persistent failure to satisfy decree may amount to contempt.
4 November 2016
1
>