HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)

The Criminal Division is Responsible for hearing all serious criminal offences referred to it by the Magistrates' Courts. According to the Principal Judge's Circular, except for Commercial Court Judges who must attend to only Commercial Court cases, the rest of the Judges of the High Court who are based in Kampala are members of the Criminal Division irrespective of the other Divisions of the High Court that they belong to.

Each of the above judges is supposed to do, at least, one High Court Criminal Session in a year at Kampala

Physical address
High Court Building at Plot 2, the Square.
239 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Topics
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
239 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
March 2018
Criminal law
23 March 2018
Criminal law
23 March 2018
Criminal law
9 March 2018
Criminal law
9 March 2018
Criminal law
9 March 2018
Criminal law
9 March 2018
Criminal law
9 March 2018
Criminal law
9 March 2018
Criminal law
9 March 2018
Criminal law
2 March 2018
No prima facie case: medical evidence discredited and identification hearsay, so accused acquitted of aggravated defilement.
Criminal law – Aggravated defilement – Prima facie proof; medical evidence credibility; hearsay and identification; person in authority; Trial on Indictments s.73; Evidence Act s.59.
1 March 2018
Criminal law
1 March 2018
Criminal law
1 March 2018
Criminal law
1 March 2018
Criminal law
1 March 2018
Criminal law
1 March 2018
Criminal law
1 March 2018
Criminal law
1 March 2018
Criminal law
1 March 2018
Criminal law
1 March 2018
February 2018
Criminal law
28 February 2018
Acquittal where poisoning allegation lacked toxicological corroboration and relied on a retracted child confession and circumstantial evidence.
Criminal law – Murder – Elements: death, unlawful act, malice aforethought, participation – requirement of proof beyond reasonable doubt
Evidence – Circumstantial evidence and retracted confession – need to exclude other reasonable hypotheses and, where relied upon, to be corroborated. Forensic evidence – Negative toxicology and postmortem findings undermine poisoning allegation
28 February 2018
Criminal law
28 February 2018
Criminal law
27 February 2018
Criminal law
27 February 2018
Criminal law
27 February 2018
Criminal law
27 February 2018
Contract Law
27 February 2018
Criminal law
26 February 2018
Criminal law
26 February 2018
Criminal law
26 February 2018
Criminal law
23 February 2018
Criminal law
22 February 2018
Criminal law
22 February 2018
Criminal law
21 February 2018
Intent to murder not proved; accused convicted of kidnapping from lawful guardianship instead.
Criminal law – Kidnapping – Elements: taking away, force or fraud, absence of consent in juveniles, and intent to murder under s243(2) – Six‑month presumption. Joint liability – common purpose (s20 Penal Code). Conviction on minor cognate offence where principal offence not proved (s87 Trial on Indictments)
20 February 2018
Prosecution proved aggravated defilement of a mentally disabled under-14 child; accused convicted and sentenced to 14 years imprisonment.
Criminal law – Aggravated defilement: proof of age; mental disability under s129(7); child evidence and s40(3) corroboration; identification evidence and its testing; sentencing guidelines and remand set-off.
20 February 2018
Accused acquitted of murder but two convicted of aggravated robbery; substance rendering victim unconscious can be a deadly weapon.
Criminal law – Murder – proof of death, unlawfulness and malice aforethought; Aggravated robbery – theft proven; substance rendering victim unconscious may constitute a 'deadly weapon' under s286(3)(b); Identification by single witness; Joint liability under s20.
20 February 2018
Accused convicted on plea of simple defilement; sentenced to 1 year 2 months after mitigation and remand credit.
Criminal procedure – amendment of indictment mid-trial – plea to amended charge accepted
Sentencing – simple defilement (s.129(1) Penal Code) – application of Sentencing Guidelines (2013) and selection of starting point
Sentencing – aggravating factors (age difference) and mitigating factors (youth, first offender, guilty plea, remorse)
Sentencing – mandatory set-off for time spent on remand under Article 23(8) Constitution and Guidelines
20 February 2018
Criminal law
20 February 2018
Criminal law
20 February 2018
Criminal law
20 February 2018
Accused convicted of murder and aggravated robbery based on forensic evidence, recent possession of stolen vehicle, and discredited alibi.
Criminal law – Murder: proof of unlawful killing and malice inferred from ligature strangulation. Criminal law – Aggravated robbery: theft of motor vehicle and use of deadly weapon (rope) proved
Evidence – Recent possession doctrine: recent possession of stolen property raises strong inference of participation
Evidence – Alibi and documentary proof: prison records can discredit alibi
Evidence – Identification by single witness (former co-accused turned witness): credibility assessment and caution required
13 February 2018
Court accepted a voluntary guilty plea for aggravated defilement and imposed six years’ imprisonment.
Criminal law – Plea bargaining – Requirements for a knowing, voluntary and intelligent guilty plea – Factual basis for plea; Sentencing – Aggravated defilement of a child under 13 – Application of sentencing guidelines, appellate precedents and remand credit.
12 February 2018
Conviction for rape based on medical and visual-identification evidence; sentence 5 years 6 months after remand set‑off.
Criminal law – Rape – ingredients: penetration, lack of consent, identity
Evidence – medical examination as proof of penetration and non-consent; admissibility and weight of night-time visual identification
Sentencing – application of Sentencing Guidelines, comparison with authorities, mitigation, and remand set‑off
8 February 2018
Conviction unsafe where victim’s age was unproved and prosecution relied on uncorroborated hearsay.
Criminal law – Aggravated defilement – essential ingredients – proof of victim’s age; Evidence – hearsay and section 59 Evidence Act – inadmissibility of untested third‑party reports as sole proof; Evidence – victim’s non‑appearance and need for corroboration; Standard – prosecution must prove each ingredient beyond reasonable doubt; Conviction unsafe where age unproved and evidence is uncorroborated hearsay.
8 February 2018
Accused convicted of rape on reliable night identification and common intention; acquitted of aggravated robbery for lack of weapon/asportation.
Criminal law – Rape – visual identification at night – factors for reliability (familiarity, light, proximity, duration, voice recognition); Common intention (s.20 Penal Code Act) – liability of co‑accused; Aggravated robbery – requirement to prove deadly weapon and asportation; Sentencing – application of Sentencing Guidelines, aggravating/mitigating factors and remand credit.
8 February 2018
Murder not proved for lack of causation; accused convicted of torture for participating in fatal corporal punishment and given time served.
Criminal law – Homicide – causation; necessity of medical evidence where remoteness exists between act and death. Circumstantial evidence – requirement to exclude reasonable hypotheses to moral certainty. Statutory reduction – convicting of lesser cognate offence (torture) where ingredients established
Participation – aiding, abetting and common intention; abandonment defence unavailable if withdrawal occurs during commission
Sentencing – mitigation for first offender and deduction for time on remand
8 February 2018
Criminal law
7 February 2018
Two accused convicted for unauthorized access, electronic fraud and system tampering; two acquitted; warrantless seizures upheld.
Computer Misuse Act – unauthorized use/interception, electronic fraud, unauthorized access and modification of data; possession and procurement of spyware
East African Community Customs Management Act – unauthorized access to customs systems; fraudulent evasion of duty (proof of knowledge and causation). Constitutional and procedural law – validity of indictment signed by authorised DPP officer; effect of post‑charge amendments. Search and seizure – exigent circumstances justify warrantless seizure of computers; forensic imaging (Encase) admissible to preserve integrity of electronic evidence
Duplicity – combined allegations forming a single transaction may be charged in one count
7 February 2018