HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)

The Criminal Division is Responsible for hearing all serious criminal offences referred to it by the Magistrates' Courts. According to the Principal Judge's Circular, except for Commercial Court Judges who must attend to only Commercial Court cases, the rest of the Judges of the High Court who are based in Kampala are members of the Criminal Division irrespective of the other Divisions of the High Court that they belong to.

Each of the above judges is supposed to do, at least, one High Court Criminal Session in a year at Kampala

Physical address
High Court Building at Plot 2, the Square.
9 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
9 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
September 2018
Proceedings before a magistrate without jurisdiction for life-imprisonment offences are null and must be quashed and retried.
Criminal procedure – jurisdiction of magistrates – S.161 Magistrates Courts Act – Grade I Magistrate cannot try offences with maximum penalty of life imprisonment; proceedings in a court without jurisdiction are null and quashed. High Court revision powers – S.50 Criminal Procedure Code; S.51 discretion to hear parties
Remedy – retrial before a competent Chief Magistrate
28 September 2018
26 September 2018
Whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that one accused's assault caused the deceased's death and warranted murder conviction.
Criminal law – Murder – Elements: death, unlawful killing, malice aforethought, participation – Evidence: post‑mortem and eyewitnesses – Conviction of one accused, acquittal of others – Remand credit applied
24 September 2018
Criminal law
24 September 2018
Court convicted accused of aggravated robbery despite an improper identification parade, relying on contemporaneous and circumstantial evidence.
Criminal law – Aggravated robbery – Proof beyond reasonable doubt – Identification evidence and improperly conducted identification parade – Contemporaneous identification and circumstantial evidence – Deadly weapon (knife) – Assessors’ opinion not binding – Remand credit on sentencing
19 September 2018
Court convicted accused of rape on victim testimony and PF3, finding reliable identification and imposing 17 years minus remand credit.
Criminal law – Rape – Unlawful sexual intercourse without consent – Single-witness identification at night – Medical PF3 corroboration – Vulnerable elderly, deaf and mute victim – Sentence with remand credit
18 September 2018
Whether the prosecution proved the respondent committed rape without consent, focusing on identification and medical corroboration.
Criminal law – Rape – elements: unlawful sexual intercourse, lack of consent; identification at night (familiarity, voice, lighting, proximity); medical corroboration of forced penetration; sentencing and remand credit
18 September 2018
Criminal law
6 September 2018
Prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case of aggravated defilement where medical and testimonial evidence did not prove participation.
Criminal law – Aggravated defilement – Prima facie case required before calling accused to defence – Burden of proof remains on prosecution – Weight of PF3A/medical evidence – Child witness evidence
3 September 2018