HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)

The Criminal Division is Responsible for hearing all serious criminal offences referred to it by the Magistrates' Courts. According to the Principal Judge's Circular, except for Commercial Court Judges who must attend to only Commercial Court cases, the rest of the Judges of the High Court who are based in Kampala are members of the Criminal Division irrespective of the other Divisions of the High Court that they belong to.

Each of the above judges is supposed to do, at least, one High Court Criminal Session in a year at Kampala

Physical address
High Court Building at Plot 2, the Square.
7 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
7 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
June 2016
Appeal dismissed: trial court properly evaluated evidence, proved theft and false pretence, and imposed lawful concurrent sentences.
Criminal law – Theft and obtaining money by false pretences – evaluation of evidence on appeal – ownership of property – relevance of investigator’s status – corroboration directions – sentencing within statutory limits.
27 June 2016
Appeal dismissed where key prosecution witness’s unchallenged evidence, corroborated by others, supported the conviction.
Traffic offences – causing death by reckless driving; accessory after the fact – conviction based on unchallenged witness evidence; failure to cross-examine and inference of acceptance; hearsay and Section 59 Evidence Act; appellate re-evaluation of evidence.
27 June 2016
The applicant’s appeal against robbery conviction and four-year sentence dismissed; conviction, sentence and compensation affirmed.
Criminal law – Robbery with violence – Elements: theft, use of violence, and identification of accused – requirement to prove beyond reasonable doubt; judicial evaluation of prosecution and defence evidence. Criminal procedure – Appellate review – materiality of trial judge’s failure to expressly evaluate defence evidence. Sentencing – proper considerations, judicial notice of rising crime, consideration of remand period; sentence within statutory maximum. Compensation – Award of damages under Section 195 of the Magistrates Courts Act for loss and damage arising from robbery.
27 June 2016
Applicant granted leave to adduce post‑trial documents as new evidence because they were unknown at trial and unchallenged.
Criminal procedure – Admission of additional evidence on appeal – Section 41 Criminal Procedure Code – New documents obtained after trial – Requirement that evidence was not within party’s knowledge at trial – Unchallenged affidavit evidence – Letters from Administrator General and Commissioner Land Registration admitted for appellate consideration.
27 June 2016
Eyewitness evidence and accused’s admission (weapon recovery) established malice aforethought; self-defence rejected, convicted of murder.
Criminal law – Murder – proof of elements: death, unlawfulness, malice aforethought and accused’s participation; eyewitness identification; confession and recovery of weapon; self-defence not established.
13 June 2016
Bail denied where offences were grave, sureties inadequate, and claimed medical 'exceptional circumstances' shown to be unproven and based on a false affidavit.
Bail — interests of justice test — exceptional circumstances under section 15(1) — economic crimes and asset-recovery considerations — adequacy and capacity of sureties — false affidavits vitiating bail applications.
10 June 2016
7 June 2016