HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)

The Criminal Division is Responsible for hearing all serious criminal offences referred to it by the Magistrates' Courts. According to the Principal Judge's Circular, except for Commercial Court Judges who must attend to only Commercial Court cases, the rest of the Judges of the High Court who are based in Kampala are members of the Criminal Division irrespective of the other Divisions of the High Court that they belong to.

Each of the above judges is supposed to do, at least, one High Court Criminal Session in a year at Kampala

Physical address
High Court Building at Plot 2, the Square.
13 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
13 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
June 2014
Appellate court upheld convictions for forgery and related offences, confirming accomplice testimony may suffice under Section 132 Evidence Act.
Criminal law – forgery, uttering false documents and obtaining registration by false pretences; accomplice evidence – competency and sufficiency under Section 132 Evidence Act; appellate re-evaluation of trial court’s assessment of documentary and witness evidence; corroboration not always required for accomplice testimony.
25 June 2014
Criminal law
24 June 2014
Constitutional Law|Criminal law|Human Rights
20 June 2014
Criminal law
20 June 2014
Criminal law
20 June 2014
Criminal law
19 June 2014
Criminal law
18 June 2014
Criminal law
18 June 2014
Criminal law
13 June 2014
Criminal law
13 June 2014
Criminal law
10 June 2014
Whether the prosecution proved all elements of murder and the voluntariness and corroboration of the accused’s confession.
Criminal law – Murder: proof of death, unlawfulness and malice aforethought; Confession: voluntariness and trial-within-trial; Circumstantial evidence and corroboration; Sentencing – life imprisonment versus death penalty.
6 June 2014
Appellate court dismissed appeal and upheld conviction for obtaining money by false pretence, finding proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Obtaining money by false pretence – elements and proof beyond reasonable doubt. Appellate review – duty to re-evaluate evidence yet defer to trial court's advantage in assessing witnesses. Evidence – effect of failure to call intermediary witnesses where their role is not disputed. Procedure – alleged failure to warn unrepresented accused about cross-examination did not vitiate conviction where no prejudice shown.
2 June 2014