|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| June 2009 |
|
|
Conviction for defilement upheld where medical, circumstantial and contemporaneous reports corroborated a hostile victim’s earlier account.
Criminal law – Defilement – proof of penetration; Corroboration of sexual offences – weight of medical evidence and contemporaneous complaints; Audial identification – caution but admissibility where witness familiarity and circumstantial support exist; Circumstantial evidence – must exclude reasonable hypothesis of innocence; Proof of victim’s age.
|
12 June 2009 |
|
Recovery of stolen goods and corroborative ballistic/medical evidence sustained conviction for aggravated robbery.
Criminal law – Aggravated robbery – elements: theft, use/threat of violence, deadly weapon, participation; circumstantial evidence. Circumstantial proof – doctrine of recent possession of stolen goods; necessity that inculpatory facts be incompatible with innocence. Evidence – ballistic and medical corroboration strengthen circumstantial case. Defence – alibi and blanket denials insufficient to negate inference of guilt.
|
12 June 2009 |
|
Acquittal where prosecution failed to prove use of a deadly weapon and the accused’s identity beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Aggravated robbery – ingredients: theft, violence, deadly weapon, participation. Evidence – Proof of deadly weapon requires firing or recovery/testing to establish capability. Identification – Night identification and camouflaged assailants require careful scrutiny. Circumstantial evidence – must exclude all reasonable hypotheses of innocence. Procedure – Failure to conduct an identification parade/poor investigative practices can fatally undermine prosecution case.
|
12 June 2009 |
|
Prosecution failed to prove identity for aggravated robbery; victims’ inconsistent statements and poor identification conditions led to acquittal.
Criminal law – Aggravated robbery – Elements: theft, violence, deadly weapon, participation – Identification evidence – Night-time identification and requirement for supportive/corroborative evidence where conditions unfavourable – Evidence Act s.155/section on former statements – Deadly weapon definition (panga vs gun).
|
12 June 2009 |
|
Circumstantial evidence and recent possession established accuseds’ guilt for aggravated robbery involving pangas as deadly weapons.
Criminal law – Aggravated robbery – Elements: theft, violence or threatened violence, use or threat of deadly weapon – Pangas as deadly weapons – Circumstantial evidence – Doctrine of recent possession – Identification and rejection of alibi.
|
12 June 2009 |
|
|
12 June 2009 |
|
Accused acquitted of aggravated robbery for lack of proof of deadly weapon but convicted of simple robbery on reliable identification evidence.
Criminal law – Aggravated robbery – ingredients: theft, violence, use of deadly weapon, participation – identification evidence – amendment of indictment – definition and proof of ‘deadly weapon’ (guns versus grenade) under antecedent law.
|
12 June 2009 |
|
Accused acquitted of murder due to unreliable identification and insufficient circumstantial evidence.
Criminal law - Murder - Elements: death, unlawfulness, malice aforethought, participation. Identification evidence - Single identifying witness at night who was intoxicated requires caution. Circumstantial evidence - Conviction requires that inculpatory facts exclude any reasonable hypothesis of innocence. Alibi and conduct after incident may weaken inference of guilt.
|
12 June 2009 |
|
Accused convicted of defilement based on medical, first‑complaint and admissible police‑statement evidence.
Criminal law – Defilement – Elements: penetration, victim’s age, and accused’s responsibility; admissibility of victim’s recorded police statement and first‑complaint evidence in absence of viva voce testimony; need for caution with identification evidence; medical evidence as corroboration of penetration.
|
5 June 2009 |
|
Whether defilement was proved beyond reasonable doubt by victim’s account, medical and corroborative scene and documentary evidence.
Criminal law – Defilement – proof of penetration – victim’s statement, medical evidence and scene inspection as corroboration. Evidence – Corroboration – prior contemporaneous statements admissible to corroborate testimony under Evidence Act. Evidence – Hostile witness – effect of contradiction of earlier statement and proof of prior statement. Identification – Single witness identification – need for caution; factors (daylight, familiarity, proximity) reducing risk of mistaken identity.
|
5 June 2009 |
|
Circumstantial evidence failed to prove the accused’s participation in a lethal panga attack; accused acquitted.
Criminal law – Murder: elements (death, unlawful causation, malice aforethought, participation); malice may be inferred from weapon and targeted neck wounds; circumstantial evidence must exclude all reasonable hypotheses of innocence; insufficiency of mere suspicion, threats, or borrowing of a weapon to convict.
|
5 June 2009 |
|
Medical, eyewitness and immediate identification evidence corroborated the victim, leading to conviction for defilement.
Criminal law – Defilement: ingredients – penetration; victim under 18; accused’s participation. Corroboration of complainant’s evidence – medical and eyewitness corroboration. Identification evidence – circumstances and caution; immediate identification and acquaintance. Alibi – rejected where contradicted by direct and circumstantial evidence.
|
5 June 2009 |
|
Malice and unlawful causation proved, but identification and participation not proved beyond reasonable doubt; accused acquitted.
Criminal law – murder – ingredients: death, unlawful causation, malice aforethought, participation. Identification evidence – caution required where identification made at night, under stress, with delayed or inconsistent statements. Circumstantial evidence – temporal proximity alone insufficient to establish linkage between separate incidents. Standard of proof – high standard for capital offences; participation must be proved beyond reasonable doubt.
|
5 June 2009 |
|
The accused were convicted of aggravated robbery where night identification, supported by corroboration, proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Aggravated robbery – elements: theft, use/threat of violence, use of deadly weapon, participation; identification evidence – single witness night identification scrutinised and corroborated; deadly weapons – pangas qualify; alibi – evaluation and rejection when fabricated.
|
5 June 2009 |
|
Victim’s reliable night identification, supported by corroboration, upheld convictions for aggravated robbery involving pangas.
Criminal law – Aggravated robbery – Elements: theft, violence, deadly weapon, participation; Identification evidence at night – need for caution and corroboration; Panga as 'deadly weapon'; Alibi – fabrication and disproof by corroborative evidence.
|
5 June 2009 |
|
Conviction for defilement based on voluntary confession and corroborative police and medical evidence.
Criminal law – Defilement – Elements: sexual intercourse, victim under 18, accused’s participation; Confession evidence – voluntariness and admissibility; Corroboration – medical report and prior complaint in absence of victim’s testimony; Caution to trial court/assessors when relying on uncorroborated complaint evidence.
|
5 June 2009 |