HC: Civil Division (Uganda)

The Civil Division is a division of the high court. It's functions include: Hearing appeal cases from the Magistrates' courts in connection with torts committed against the person, Defamation, Bankruptcy and company winding up matters, Partnership matters,Companies matters, Real and personal property.

Physical address
Twed towers, along Kafu Road, Nakasero.
10 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
10 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
September 2024
Application for judicial review of a Parliamentary committee report dismissed as premature because report had not been adopted by Parliament.
Judicial review — amenability — committee report tabled but not adopted by Parliament — no reviewable decision; joinder of parties — Order 1 r.3 CPR; Rule 7A Judicature (Judicial Review) Rules — exhaustion and public body requirement.
19 September 2024
The applicant’s diplomatic immunity bars the respondent’s funding claim; the plaint is struck out and the suit dismissed with costs.
* Diplomatic immunity – scope and application – whether a foreign development agency’s call for proposals falls within official functions attracting immunity under the Vienna Convention and bilateral agreement. * Private vs public law – invitation to treat, legitimate expectation and enforceable rights arising from proposal short‑listing. * Civil procedure – strike out for frivolous, vexatious claims and abuse of process.
12 September 2024
A litigant cannot file an advocate’s bill for taxation; only an advocate may do so, so the taxation award was set aside.
Advocates Act and Regulations – Taxation of costs – Only advocates may file and present advocates’ bills for taxation – Litigant cannot file a professional bill – Trial court’s taxation of a self-drafted bill is material irregularity – Revision under s.83 Civil Procedure Act.
12 September 2024
The defendant breached the grant agreement by failing to disclose other funding; plaintiff awarded $72,980, interest and costs.
Contract law – Grant agreement – Failure to disclose alternative funding; double dipping; requirement for written variation; sanctity of contract; entitlement to refund, interest and costs.
12 September 2024
A board’s advertisement to fill a presidential appointee’s post was unlawful; only the President can remove such an officer.
Administrative law – judicial review – illegality, procedural impropriety and ultra vires acts; Constitutional appointments – Article 172(1)(a) – only appointing authority may remove presidential appointees; Statutory immunity – qualified; Exhaustion of remedies – doctrine inapplicable where statute provides no internal remedy; Remedies – declaration, certiorari, prohibition and costs.
6 September 2024
Court refuses to lift corporate veil where applicants failed to prove fraud or exhaust execution remedies.
Companies law – lifting corporate veil; section 20 Companies Act – requires fraud/tax evasion or abuse of corporate form; execution law – applicants must first exhaust available modes of execution; alter-ego doctrine reserved for cogent evidence of misuse to defeat legal obligations.
6 September 2024

 

6 September 2024
Appellate court upheld Medical Council’s finding that hospital was not negligent for prioritising life‑saving care over ROP screening.
Medical negligence – duty of care and informed consent – Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) – prioritisation of life‑saving treatment over non‑immediate interventions – standard of a reasonably competent medical practitioner – weight of expert evidence and deference to body of professional opinion.
6 September 2024

 

6 September 2024
Appeal allowed: suit reinstated in the interest of justice despite litigant’s lack of diligence and trial court procedural errors.
* Civil Procedure – reinstatement of suit – Order 9 rule 18 CPR – sufficient cause – negligence of counsel versus litigant’s diligence. * Procedural fairness – right to be heard – adjournment and leave to file written submissions. * Procedural law – requirement to decide preliminary points of law before disposing on merits. * Interests of justice – preference to determine disputes on merits even where delay or inattention occurred.
6 September 2024