HC: Civil Division (Uganda)

The Civil Division is a division of the high court. It's functions include: Hearing appeal cases from the Magistrates' courts in connection with torts committed against the person, Defamation, Bankruptcy and company winding up matters, Partnership matters,Companies matters, Real and personal property.

Physical address
Twed towers, along Kafu Road, Nakasero.
224 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
224 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
February 2017
Failure to implement a staff tribunal's promotion orders constituted contempt, warranting mandamus, declaration and compensation.
Administrative law – Judicial review – supervisory jurisdiction over tribunals’ and administrative bodies’ decisions – focus on lawfulness, procedural propriety and natural justice. Contempt – Failure of an administrative body to implement its internal tribunal’s orders – constitutes contempt and illegality. Remedies – Declaratory relief, mandamus to compel implementation of tribunal directions, compensatory award for contempt, and payment of taxed costs.
20 February 2017
Judicial review dismissed because employment dispute requiring evidential determination must be brought under the Employment Act.
Judicial review – inappropriate where disputes require contested factual evidence – employment disputes (wrongful dismissal, damages, salary arrears) not suited to judicial review procedure. Civil procedure – forum conveniens – employment claims to be pursued under the Employment Act by ordinary plaint. Remedies – certiorari/prohibition/mandamus unsuitable for resolving substantive employment entitlements.
20 February 2017
The plaintiff, held to be an unlicensed money-lender, had a statute-barred and illegal claim and the suit was dismissed with costs.
Money Lenders Act – definition of Money Lender (s.1(h)) – holding out as a lender. Limitation – s.19(1) Money Lenders Act – 12-month limitation for recovery of loans. Civil Procedure – Order 7 r.6 – requirement to plead exemption from statutory limitation. Illegality – unlicensed money lending (s.2(4)(b)) renders agreement unenforceable. Security and interest clauses indicate commercial money-lending, not a "friendly" loan.
15 February 2017
Payment and acceptance of rent established tenancy; landlord's self-help locking was unlawful and nominal damages were reduced.
Tenancy – proof by conduct and documents – payment and acceptance of rent as evidence of continuing tenancy and estoppel; Self-help by landlord – unlawful locking of rented premises; Counterclaim – inadmissible where claimant caused loss by locking premises; Damages – general damages presumed from loss of possession; nominal damages must be modest and reflect subject matter value.
15 February 2017
Challenge to 2016 licensing circular held moot after new 2017 guidelines and licences removed any live controversy.
Administrative law – Judicial review – Mootness doctrine – Challenge to regulatory guidelines and circular rendered academic by subsequent valid guidelines and issuance of licences – Court declines to grant relief – Costs: each party to bear own costs.
15 February 2017
Appeal dismissed except interest: oral sale and damages affirmed, 35% interest set aside and replaced by 6% with appropriate running dates.
Civil procedure – Appeal – re-evaluation of evidence by first appellate court – oral contract of sale – proof and breach; Special damages – must be pleaded and proved but may be established by cogent oral evidence; General damages – discretion in assessment; Interest – discretionary under CPA ss.26(2), 27(3) – appellate correction of excessive commercial interest; Interest periods – special damages from filing, general damages and costs from judgment.
10 February 2017
Hearsay of an informal 'appointment' cannot ground certiorari or mandamus; judicial review examines decision-making process, not merits.
Administrative law — Judicial review — Remedies of certiorari and mandamus — Applicant’s burden to show illegality, irrationality or procedural impropriety; hearsay evidence inadmissible under Evidence Act s.59; judicial review examines process not merits; University Appointments Board decisions subject to University Council (Universities and Other Tertiary Institutions Act s.50); mandamus requires clear legal right.
9 February 2017
Application to regularize an arbitration award dismissed as premature pending statutory appeal to the Cooperatives Board.
Cooperative Societies Act – arbitration award – statutory appeal to Uganda Cooperative Alliance Board under Section 73 – requirement to exhaust Board appeal before High Court; premature proceedings; abuse of process.
3 February 2017
Summary dismissal for unexplained cash shortages upheld; disciplinary process and natural justice found complied with; damages set aside.
Employment law – summary dismissal for gross misconduct; staff regulations 4.01 – investigatory powers and dismissal without benefits; natural justice – adequacy of opportunity to explain; effect of later acquittal on disciplinary action; malicious prosecution – threshold for DPP-led prosecutions.
3 February 2017
Review application dismissed for failing to demonstrate new evidence or an error on the face of the record.
Judicial review – High Court jurisdiction to review its own orders – Grounds for review: new evidence, error on face of record, or sufficient cause – Previous review and finality; abuse of process – Inherent powers of court; statutory review under Section 82 CPA and Order 46 CPR.
2 February 2017
Mandamus to execute an interlocutory ex parte taxation award denied where substantive petition and application to set aside are pending.
Judicial review – prerogative remedy – mandamus – requirement of certificate of order under Government Proceedings Act s.19 – compliance noted. Execution of awards – interlocutory/ex parte taxation – courts will not enforce interlocutory awards while substantive proceedings and applications to set aside remain pending to avoid unjust enrichment and abuse of process. Procedure – applicants must prosecute substantive petition to conclusion before seeking mandamus to enforce taxed costs.
1 February 2017
January 2017
25 January 2017
Default judgment did not excuse proving causation; first and second defendants liable for defamation; third defendant not vicariously liable.
Defamation – libel imputing criminal conduct actionable per se; Default/interlocutory judgment – does not relieve plaintiff of proving causation and quantum on formal proof; Pleadings and submissions are not evidence; Vicarious liability – requires proof of master‑servant/agency relationship; Unlawful dismissal/injunction claims require proof of contract of service and fair hearing.
24 January 2017
Leave to appeal refused: no arguable grounds and application amounted to abuse of process.
Election law — recounts under s.55 PEA — magistrate’s powers do not extend to staying gazetting; Revision and inherent jurisdiction — High Court may intervene where jurisdictional defects or illegal orders apparent; Orders without jurisdiction are void ab initio; Remedy for disobedience is contempt or formal set-aside; Multiplicity of proceedings — parallel applications can amount to abuse of court process.
24 January 2017
Court cannot extend the statutory 30‑day period for election petitions absent enabling provision or existing proceedings.
Parliamentary elections — Limitation of time — Section 60(3) PEA prescribes 30‑day period to file election petition — Court cannot extend statutory time by rule — Rule 19 PER enlarges time set by rules only and requires existing proceedings on record — Extension requires sufficient cause; applicant’s procedural misconduct may negate special circumstances — Recount remedy under s.63(5).
24 January 2017
Tribunal may re‑open unpleaded factual issues in merits review, but must afford fair hearing before awarding costs.
Public procurement – administrative merits review – PPDA Tribunal powers under s.91I(6) – Tribunal may stand in shoes of original decision‑maker and consider material not pleaded – distinction between merits review and judicial review – bid validity and Regulation 49(5) – Regulation 74(1)/(2) considerations – award of costs requires opportunity to be heard and reasons.
24 January 2017

 

23 January 2017
Court set aside part of Registrar’s interim order, struck out improperly added party, and imposed tailored interim regime pending judicial review.
• Civil procedure – interlocutory orders of Registrar – appeal by motion under Order 50/Order 44 CPR – procedural irregularities may be overlooked to serve substantive justice. • Judicial review – interim relief – proper test: preserve actual status quo, consider irreparable harm and balance of convenience. • Parties – improperly added parties may be struck out; court may substitute tailored interim measures pending substantive hearing.
19 January 2017
Registration of a UK order recognizing a Tanzanian arbitral award was inappropriate; enforcement should proceed under domestic arbitration law (New York Convention).
Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgments Act – registration of foreign judgments; Arbitration and Conciliation Act – enforcement of New York Convention awards; Seat of arbitration – award treated as made in seat (Tanzania); Proper procedure for recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards; Judicial discretion as to whether registration is just and convenient; Sovereignty and forum of enforcement; Requirement to disclose enforcement particulars (assets).
17 January 2017
Temporary injunction granted to beneficiaries to restrain disposition of estate land pending determination of ownership dispute.
Civil procedure – interim injunction – requirements: prima facie case, irreparable injury, balance of convenience. Succession/estate law – beneficiaries’ right to protect estate property pending administration. Property transactions – alleged fraudulent registration and protection against alienation pending trial. Ex parte proceedings where respondents fail to respond despite service.
17 January 2017
Substitution or joinder that introduces a new cause of action or substitutes a corporate plaintiff with a different natural person is disallowed.
Civil procedure – substitution of parties (Order 1 r.10(1)) – bona fide mistake vs. introduction of new claimant; Civil procedure – addition/striking out of parties (Order 1 r.10(2)) – joinder permissible only where necessary to adjudicate existing issues, not to introduce new causes of action; Amendment of pleadings (Order 6 r.19) – requisite procedure, annexure of proposed amended plaint and avoidance of prejudice to opposing party; Locus/standing – effect of incorrect or non-existent corporate plaintiff name; Prejudice and delay – substantive defence cannot be circumvented by post‑filing substitution or joinder.
13 January 2017
Central bank removal upheld; judicial review available; natural justice satisfied; immunity exception for bad faith established.
Administrative law – Judicial review of central bank supervisory action; statutory immunity under MDI Act – exception for bad faith; fit-and-proper criteria for management of microfinance institutions; natural justice – adequacy of opportunity to respond to internal audit findings; supervisory powers under sections 55, 56 and 58 and application of Second Schedule.
13 January 2017
Court consolidated two suits between the same parties over the same property due to overlapping issues.
Civil procedure – consolidation of suits – Order 11 rr 1 and 2 CPR – discretion to consolidate where same facts or questions of law arise Property law – easement agreement; disputed payments and refund claim; detinue of land titles and claim for damages Case management – requirement for joint scheduling memorandum to capture issues from consolidated suits
13 January 2017
Proceedings (judgment, taxation, execution) conducted outside the originating court after a magistrate’s transfer were nullified for lack of territorial jurisdiction.
Civil revision – territorial jurisdiction of magistrates’ courts – transfer of magistrate does not transfer court’s local jurisdiction – unsigned/undated judgment and incorrect decree date curable – taxation and execution without proof of service and outside proper venue amount to material irregularity – set aside of post‑hearing proceedings.
10 January 2017