|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| December 2016 |
|
|
Judicial review dismissed: district origin lawfully interpreted to include parents' birthplace; verification process valid.
Administrative law – Judicial review – Amenability of verification exercise to review; Public education policy – District quota eligibility – Meaning and application of "district of origin"; Administrative fairness – Relevant and irrelevant considerations; Joinder of parties – Correct parties to verification process.
|
24 December 2016 |
|
A civil court will not overturn a completed criminal conviction as contempt; the proper remedy is appeal and proper parties must be sued.
Contempt of court — interim injunctions in criminal proceedings — enforceability where trial court has already delivered judgment — civil court should not review criminal conviction; remedy is appeal — corporate status of Inspector General of Government.
|
23 December 2016 |
|
Court reviewed omission to give reasons on costs, exercised discretion and ordered no costs in the main suit; each party to bear own costs.
Costs—discretion under Section 27(2) CPA; Review—error apparent on the face of the record for omission to give reasons; Remedy—review vs appeal; Costs not awarded where suit did not take off and costs were not prayed for.
|
21 December 2016 |
|
Court quashed inquiry findings against contractors for errors of fact/law and denial of a fair hearing.
* Commission of Inquiry – amenable to judicial review where acting ultra vires, irrationally, or in breach of natural justice
* Administrative law – error of fact and error of law vitiating findings
* Natural justice – audi alteram partem; right to fair hearing and meaningful opportunity to explain
* Irrationality – decisions unsupported by evidence and speculative conclusions
* Remedies – certiorari and prohibition to quash and restrain unlawful Commission findings
|
21 December 2016 |
|
Court found the defendant liable for the accident and awarded reduced special damages, general damages, interest and costs.
* Motor-vehicle collisions – liability – prior criminal findings and admissions as evidence of causation.
* Special damages – requirement of specific pleading and proof; oral evidence and photographs may suffice but awards may be adjusted when documentary proof is deficient.
* General damages – compensatory award for inconvenience arising from negligence.
* Exemplary damages – not awarded where prior punitive sanction considered sufficient.
* Interest and costs – interest at 20% from filing and costs awarded to plaintiffs.
|
20 December 2016 |
|
A dismissal under Order 17 and section 17(2)(a) is a final order and can only be set aside on appeal.
Civil procedure – Order 17 CPR – dismissal for delay – finality of dismissal under Order 17 and section 17(2)(a) Judicature Act; reinstatement – jurisdiction of trial court to reopen dismissed suits; appeal as proper remedy.
|
16 December 2016 |
|
|
15 December 2016 |
|
Applicants entitled to monetary refund and damages after respondent delivered only part of contracted land.
* Contract law – sale of land – formation and breach – delivery of less land than contracted (182 ha delivered of 259 ha) leading to breach.
* Remedies – specific performance vs restitution/monetary compensation where defendant lacks available land.
* Evidence/Illiterates Protection Act – Act does not invalidate admitted written agreement; representative signing suffices for locus.
* Damages – award of special and general damages, commercial interest on monetary refund, costs follow the event.
|
15 December 2016 |
|
A caveat on a director’s personal land cannot secure a company’s taxed debt without first lifting the corporate veil.
* Company law – separate legal personality – director’s personal assets cannot be charged for company debts without lifting the corporate veil (s.20 Companies Act 2012).
* Civil procedure – interim relief – prerequisites for temporary injunction: substantial question, irreparable harm, balance of convenience.
* Caveat/land registration – caveat improperly placed on personal property to secure corporate liability is unlawful and cannot be preserved by injunction.
|
13 December 2016 |
|
Amendment to judicial review motion refused where it changed the cause of action and prejudiced the respondent's defence.
Judicial review — Amendment of motion (Rule 7 Judicial Review Rules 2009) — Amendments permitted but cannot substitute a distinct cause of action or prejudice respondent’s defences — Amendments should relate to matters arising within Rule 5 filing period.
|
12 December 2016 |
|
Applicant failed to prove real risk of asset dissipation or meet disclosure and undertaking requirements for pre-judgment attachment.
Civil procedure – attachment before judgment (Mareva injunction) – requirements: good arguable case; real risk of dissipation; full and frank disclosure in ex parte applications; cross-undertaking in damages; proportionality and alternative enforcement in foreign jurisdiction (reciprocal enforcement).
|
10 December 2016 |
|
Judicial review inappropriate for wrongful dismissal where an adequate alternative remedy (ordinary suit) exists.
* Administrative law – Judicial review vs ordinary suit – wrongful dismissal typically remedied by ordinary action where alternative remedy exists
* Prerogative orders – certiorari, prohibition, injunction – discretionary and sparingly granted
* Natural justice – summoned employee’s non-attendance relevant to merits but does not necessarily convert dispute into judicial review
* Requirement to show absence or ineffectiveness of alternative remedies before granting prerogative relief
|
9 December 2016 |
|
Failure to appeal a cooperative arbitral award within statutory time renders it final and enforceable as a court judgment.
* Cooperative Societies Act s73 – disputes between society and member subject to Arbitration; appeals to the Board within 60 days; unappealed awards final and enforceable as court judgments.
* Civil Procedure Act s83 – revision of Magistrates' Court proceedings does not extend to reviewing arbitral awards under s73.
* Procedure – proof of service and failure to set aside or appeal arbitral award bars collateral attack during enforcement.
|
9 December 2016 |
|
An applicant must show prima facie success and irreparable harm to restrain a mortgagee’s sale; delay alone is insufficient.
* Mortgage law – interlocutory injunction – applicant must show prima facie case and irreparable harm to restrain mortgagee sale.
* Interpretation of Mortgage Rules 2012, Regulation 13(1) – applies to adjournment of sale, not a general deposit requirement for injunctions.
* Procedural compliance – question whether statutory notices were given considered but primary dispute was method of sale (private treaty v public auction).
* Abuse of process – using injunction to buy time to find a private buyer is impermissible.
|
8 December 2016 |
|
Applicant's challenge to revoked promotion fails: flawed selection justified rescission; application dismissed with costs.
Administrative law – judicial review – promotions in public service – requirement for transparent, merit‑based selection procedures – supervisory role of Public Service Commission; Duty to act fairly in administrative decisions (distinct from full audi alteram partem); Certiorari/prohibition/injunction not available where flawed process justified rescission and no evidence of unfair/punitive posting.
|
8 December 2016 |
|
Applicant granted leave to defend disputed supply claims, but judgment entered for admitted UGX 29,478,100 against the applicant.
* Civil procedure – Order 36 r 4 – leave to appear and defend – requirement of a triable issue as to fact or law.
* Civil procedure – Order 13 r 6 – judgment on admission – admission must be clear, unequivocal and unconditional.
* Evidence Act s.57 – court’s discretion to require proof of admitted facts; not exercised where admission is categorical.
* Contract/supply disputes – triable issues as to delivery, volume and valuation of goods.
|
8 December 2016 |
|
Defendant breached the contract; plaintiff awarded adjusted unpaid sums, general damages, interest and costs after unchallenged ex parte hearing.
Contract law – Breach of contract for non‑payment; ex parte proceedings where defendant failed to appear; reliance on unchallenged plaintiff evidence and independent engineer’s report to quantify sums due; awards of unpaid contract sums, adjusted amounts for defects/unfinished work, general damages, interest and costs.
|
7 December 2016 |
|
Applicant’s diploma cancellation quashed: decision found procedurally unfair, unlawful and beyond the respondent’s statutory power.
Administrative law — Judicial review — Grounds: illegality, procedural impropriety, irrationality — Fair hearing/audi alteram partem — Power to revoke academic awards — Ultra vires cancellation of conferred diploma — Remedies: declarations, certiorari, prohibition, costs; mandamus and general damages declined.
|
5 December 2016 |
|
Cancellation of a conferred diploma quashed for irrationality and denial of fair hearing; injunction and prohibition granted.
Administrative law – Judicial review – Grounds: illegality, irrationality and procedural impropriety; revocation of academic awards – require proof of recipient’s personal fraud/misconduct; natural justice – right to fair hearing and disclosure of adverse forensic evidence; admissibility of supplementary affidavits – liberal approach in judicial review.
|
5 December 2016 |
|
Diploma cancellation quashed for irrationality and breach of natural justice; fair hearing ordered.
* Judicial review – administrative decision to cancel an academic diploma – grounds: irrationality and procedural impropriety (natural justice, adequate notice, right to cross-examine). * Evidence – affidavits must be based on personal knowledge; material filed without leave may be struck out. * Remedies – certiorari to quash unlawful decision, mandamus to compel a fair hearing, injunction to restrain acting on the impugned decision; prohibition and damages discretionary.
|
5 December 2016 |
|
A trial in a court lacking territorial jurisdiction is a nullity; appeal allowed and proceedings set aside.
Magistrates’ courts — territorial jurisdiction — creation of new magisterial area by statutory instrument; jurisdiction as creature of statute; proceedings in a court without territorial jurisdiction are a nullity; objection to place of suing may be entertained on appeal where illegality or failure of justice is shown.
|
5 December 2016 |
|
A challenge to a taxed bill is governed by the Advocates Act and is time-barred if not appealed within 30 days.
Advocates Act s.62(1) – Taxation appeals/references within 30 days; Advocates (Remuneration and Taxation of Costs) Regulations govern taxation procedure; Civil Procedure Rules not applicable to taxation appeals; Revision under s.83 limited by lapse-of-time clause (no serious hardship).
|
2 December 2016 |
|
A dismissed appeal was reinstated: counsel’s absence and jurat defects were curable; appeal has arguable grounds.
* Civil procedure – reinstatement of dismissed appeal – Order 43 r16 – sufficient cause required for reinstatement. * Evidence – affidavits – supplementary affidavit filed out of time may be admitted in interests of justice. * Jurat defects – omission of Commissioner for Oaths' name curable where confirmed; substantive justice over technicalities. * Legal representation – negligence or mistake of counsel not usually visited on litigant. * Costs – appellate interference only where taxing officer misdirected or assessment manifestly wrong.
|
2 December 2016 |
|
An ex‑parte judgment was set aside where the applicant’s absence resulted from counsel’s negligence, not the applicant’s fault.
* Civil procedure – Setting aside ex‑parte judgment – mistake or negligence of counsel – whether client should suffer for advocate’s omission. * Civil procedure – Service on advocate – presumption of notice vs. evidentiary burden to prove communication to client. * Burden of proof – party asserting notice must prove advocate informed client. * Binding precedent – lower courts bound to follow higher‑court authorities on mistakes of counsel.
|
1 December 2016 |
|
Court granted administration ad litem and substituted the applicant as legal representative to defend the deceased’s interest, allowing amendment of the defence.
* Succession Act s.222 – letters of administration ad litem – limited grants to represent deceased in pending suits where cause of action survives and urgency prevents full grant. * Civil Procedure Rules Order 24 r.1 & r.4 – death of defendant does not abate suit; substitution of legal representative. * Civil Procedure Rules Order 6 r.19 – leave to amend pleadings to reflect substituted legal representative. * Administration ad litem may be granted without advertisement where urgency shown.
|
1 December 2016 |
|
A conditional/ equivocal pleading did not justify judgment on admission; only the borrower (first defendant) was held liable; others lacked consideration.
Civil procedure – Judgment on admission (Order 13 r.6) – admission must be clear, unequivocal and unconditional; inherent jurisdiction to correct error; Contract – non est factum defence – high threshold, not available for mere negligence; Consideration – gratuitous family promises unenforceable; Damages – measure for late repayment of money is interest.
|
1 December 2016 |
|
Claims against public officers for slander and unlawful arrest were time-barred; vicarious liability does not absolve agents of direct liability.
Civil procedure – Pleading sufficiency for slander, false imprisonment and malicious prosecution; vicarious liability – principals and agents as joint and several tortfeasors; Limitation – actions against public officers under s.4 Civil Procedure and Limitation (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, Cap 72; Time-barred claims and requirement to plead disability or date of termination of prosecution.
|
1 December 2016 |