HC: Civil Division (Uganda)

The Civil Division is a division of the high court. It's functions include: Hearing appeal cases from the Magistrates' courts in connection with torts committed against the person, Defamation, Bankruptcy and company winding up matters, Partnership matters,Companies matters, Real and personal property.

Physical address
Twed towers, along Kafu Road, Nakasero.
13 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Topics
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
13 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 1995
1 December 1995
November 1995
30 November 1995
October 1995
30 October 1995
30 October 1995
Defendant vicariously liable for negligent dangerous overtaking; plaintiff awarded special and general damages.
* Motor vehicle accidents – negligent overtaking on a sharp corner – liability for resultant collision. * Vicarious liability – master‑servant relationship established; owner responsibility despite unpaid instalments (Sale of Goods Ordinance). * Damages – proof required for special damages and reasonable assessment of general damages for personal injury. * Ex parte proceedings – court must ensure pleadings and evidence suffice to support judgment.
18 October 1995
September 1995
18 September 1995
August 1995
Where construction is for a school and not for private benefit, officials sued personally for trespass must be sued in their official capacity or the governing body.
Property law – Trespass to land; Personal versus official liability of school officials; Proper parties to sue where institutional premises are erected on disputed land; Pleadings must show personal entry or private benefit to impose personal liability.
30 August 1995
July 1995
Reduction of instruction fee upheld where taxation wrongly relied on present value including third‑party developments.
Civil procedure — Taxation of costs — Instruction fee — Relevance of subject-matter value — When present market value (including third‑party developments) is inappropriate — Appellate review under Rule 109 and paragraph 9(2) of the Third Schedule — Expropriated Properties Act: interpretation vs conferment of proprietary rights.
6 July 1995
April 1995
18 April 1995
March 1995
27 March 1995
The court held the lump-sum retirement calculation follows the prevailing savings interest rate at retirement, awarding shs. 2,514,484/= to the plaintiff.
Employment law – retirement benefits – Staff Circular No.2 of 1991 – interpretation of lump-sum formula and applicable interest rate; Discretion to award notch increments; set-off of loan against lump-sum; reliefs including payment, issuance of retirement certificate and release of title.
9 March 1995
1 March 1995
February 1995
17 February 1995