High Court of Uganda

The High Court of Uganda is the third court of record in order of hierarchy and has unlimited original jurisdiction, which means that it can try any case of any value or crime of any magnitude. Appeals from all Magistrates Courts go to the High Court. 

The High Court is headed by the Honorable Principal Judge who is responsible for the administration of the court and has supervisory powers over Magistrate's courts. 

Physical address
Plot 2, the Square Kampala
219 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Topics
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
219 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
November 2025
Applicants failed to show arguable grounds for leave to appeal a reinstatement order setting aside a dismissal.
* Civil procedure – Leave to appeal – Applicant must show arguable grounds/prospects of success for leave to appeal (Order 44 r2). * Civil procedure – Service of interlocutory processes – court’s power to enlarge time; leave to serve out of time (section 96; Order 51 r6). * Civil procedure – Dismissal under Order 9 r17 and setting aside under Order 9 r18 – sufficient cause and exercise of discretion. * Evidence – Alleged hearsay objection weakened where decision rests on non-notification and court record. * Abuse of process – Re-litigating an issue already determined by trial court may constitute abuse.
10 November 2025
Appellant proved lineage title; respondents failed to prove acquisition and were adjudged trespassers; appeal allowed with costs.
Land law – ownership by lineage succession; burden of proof under Evidence Act; nemo dat quod non habet; failure to call key witness; trespass – unauthorized entry despite clan directive; striking out vague grounds of appeal.
10 November 2025
Applicant's transport difficulties and prompt action constituted sufficient cause to set aside dismissal and reinstate the appeal.
Civil procedure – Setting aside dismissal for non-appearance – Sufficient cause – Transport difficulties and counsel's engagement – Promptness in seeking redress – Article 126(2)(e) Constitution – Section 98 Civil Procedure Act – Section 33 Judicature Act – Right to be heard – Land disputes to be decided on merits.
6 November 2025
Mandamus granted to compel land registration where registrar failed to act on presented transfer instruments.
Administrative law – Judicial review – Mandamus to compel performance of statutory duty – Registration of titles – Registrar’s duty to enter dealings – Failure to act where transfer instruments presented – Unopposed affidavit evidence – General damages not awarded for lack of proof.
6 November 2025
Affidavits by the applicant’s State Attorneys were defective and Magistrates’ Court lacked jurisdiction under the Physical Planning Act; appeal dismissed.
Civil procedure – Affidavits – Order 19 Rule 3(1): affidavit must state facts within deponent’s knowledge or disclose source of information; hearsay inadmissible. Advocates – Professional conduct: counsel should not act as both advocate and witness in the same contentious matter. Administrative law – Physical Planning Act: internal multi‑tier review scheme culminating in High Court; exhaustion of administrative remedies and ouster of Magistrates’ Court jurisdiction for enforcement matters. Reinstatement – requires competent, properly supported application; absence of evidentiary foundation fatal.
6 November 2025
Applicant granted unconditional leave to defend amid triable disputes on service, quantum, illegality, fraud and security.
Civil procedure – summary suit – leave to appear and defend – discretion to enlarge time; service of summons – validity and affidavit of service; bona fide triable issues – fraud, forgery, misrepresentation, undue influence; disputed quantum and account; alleged unlicensed money‑lending and illegality of interest; disputed security and caveat; dual commissioning of affidavits – weight not fatal.
6 November 2025
Administrative delay by the lower court justified extending time for the applicant to file an appeal.
Civil procedure – extension of time to appeal – Section 79(1)(b), Section 96 and 98 Civil Procedure Act; Order 51 Rules – administrative delay in preparing certified records as sufficient cause; requirement that intended appeal be arguable; costs to abide outcome.
6 November 2025
October 2025
Bail granted after court found fixed abode and suitable sureties; remand period did not mandate automatic release.
* Constitutional law – Bail – Article 23(6) and Article 28(3)(a) – entitlement to apply for bail and presumption of innocence. * Criminal procedure – Trial on Indictment Act s.15 – High Court discretion to grant bail at any stage. * Bail Guidelines – suitability and documentation for sureties; factors for fixed abode and mandatory release after 180 days prior to committal. * Evidence – sufficiency of LCI introduction letter and NIN form to prove fixed residence. * Public interest – seriousness of offence and alleged risk of witness interference assessed but held insufficient to deny bail.
23 October 2025
The applicant granted discretionary bail after proving fixed abode and suitable sureties despite a serious murder charge.
* Constitutional law – Bail – Right to apply for bail (Article 23(6)(a)) and presumption of innocence (Article 28(3)(a)). * Criminal procedure – Bail Guidelines (2022) – proof and suitability of sureties, fixed place of abode. * Trial procedure – Mandatory release after 180 days on remand and effect of subsequent committal. * Balancing public interest and risk of witness interference against liberty interests.
23 October 2025
Court consolidated two suits arising from the same investment agreement to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
Civil procedure – consolidation of suits under Order 11 rule 1 and section 98 – suits arising from the same investment agreement – similar questions of law and fact – avoidance of multiplicity of proceedings – differing parties or ancillary claims (personal guarantee) do not bar consolidation where issues overlap.
15 October 2025
Inordinate delay and absence of arguable grounds warranted dismissal of leave to appeal out of time.
Civil procedure — Leave to appeal out of time — requirement of good/sufficient cause and arguable grounds; inordinate delay and dilatory conduct; representation of deceased party on appeal; abuse of court process.
15 October 2025
Appeal dismissed: suit not time‑barred, res judicata unproven, evidence reappraised and trial court’s orders upheld.
Land law – recovery of land – Limitation Act s.5: cause of action accrues on trespass; res judicata – plea must be supported by a valid judgment/documentary evidence; Evidence Act s.103 – burden of proof; appellate re-appraisal of evidence; awards of general damages discretionary.
13 October 2025
Impoundment under a taxing Act lies within Tax Appeals Tribunal’s original jurisdiction, not High Court.
Tax law – jurisdiction; Tax Appeals Tribunal original jurisdiction over decisions under taxing Acts; East African Community Customs Management Act – impoundment of vehicles as decision under a taxing Act; High Court’s inherent jurisdiction displaced where statute vests original jurisdiction in a specialised tribunal.
7 October 2025
The applicants' certificate of no objection annulled for fraud; surviving spouses preferred administrators; caveats upheld.
Succession law – Administration of intestate estate; Fraudulent procurement of Administrator General certificate using forged family minutes; Validity of caveats against grant of letters of administration; Distinction between joint tenancy (survivorship) and tenancy in common (estate share); Preference of surviving spouse(s) as administrators; Remedies and costs (each party bears own).
1 October 2025
September 2025
An extension of probate was refused because mandatory consents of all beneficiaries were not produced despite reasonable delay justification.
* Succession law – filing inventory – section 273(1) obligation; inventory filing depends on validity of grant. * Succession law – extension/renewal of grant – sections 337(2) & (4) and 256(2)/(3) – discretionary relief with statutory conditions. * Mandatory beneficiary consents – section 256(3)(b)(2) – absence of consents is fatal to extension application. * Procedural relief – partial accountability/final accounts may be filed in extension proceedings.
30 September 2025
Applicant failed to show sufficient cause to set aside a dismissal for want of prosecution; reinstatement refused.
Civil procedure – dismissal for want of prosecution; Order 43 Rules 14 and 16 – readmission for "sufficient cause"; diligence and honest intention to prosecute; pandemic and illness not automatically sufficient; finality of litigation and misuse of court process.
30 September 2025
Whether the Physical Planning Act confines enforcement jurisdiction to the High Court, ousting Magistrates' Courts.
• Administrative law – Physical Planning Act – specialized internal review and appeal hierarchy – enforcement actions to be addressed by planning tribunals and High Court. • Civil procedure – jurisdiction – whether Magistrates’ Courts’ jurisdiction is ousted by specific statutory provision defining "Court" as the High Court. • Doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies – parliamentary scheme for technical planning disputes. • Procedural irregularities – late filing of submissions and appeal – curable irregularity vs. jurisdictional time bar.
30 September 2025
Accused acquitted of rape because identity/participation was not proved despite evidence of sexual assault and lack of consent.
Criminal law—Rape: elements—sexual act and lack of consent proven; identity/participation must be proved beyond reasonable doubt; corroboration in sexual offences required, especially where complainant does not testify; absence of independent evidence linking accused to crime necessitates acquittal.
24 September 2025
The appellate court reduced a manifestly excessive sentence for malicious damage, correcting errors in sentencing procedure.
Criminal law – sentencing – appellate review of sentence – improper conversion of imprisonment to fine/compensation – interference with sentencing discretion where harsh or excessive – consideration of sentencing principles and mitigating factors.
4 September 2025
Application for striking defence, contempt, and access to information dismissed for procedural and jurisdictional failures.
Civil Procedure – Striking out defence – Service of written statement of defence – Good faith actions by public officers – Access to information – Jurisdiction for information complaints – Contempt of court – Proper application of interim orders – Discovery of documents.
1 September 2025
August 2025
A person charged with aggravated defilement was granted bail after court found sufficient proof of residence and suitable sureties.
Criminal procedure – bail application – aggravated defilement – presumption of innocence – sufficiency of sureties – risk of abscondment – fixed place of abode – conditions for grant of bail – balancing rights of accused and interests of justice.
28 August 2025
Bail was denied to the applicant charged with murder due to risk of witness interference arising from his influential community position.
Criminal procedure – Bail – Murder charge – Discretion of court to grant bail – Substantiality of sureties – Risk of interference with witnesses – Community influence of accused as ground for denial.
28 August 2025
Court denied bail for a rape accused due to insufficient proof of a fixed place of abode despite substantial sureties.
Criminal procedure – bail application – fixed place of abode – substantial sureties – discretion of the court in bail for serious offences – presumption of innocence – right to liberty – interest of justice.
28 August 2025
A certificate of title fraudulently procured by excluding estate beneficiaries will be cancelled, and the land restored to the estate.
Succession law – Intestate succession – Customary land – Administration of estate – Fraudulent procurement of certificate of title – Cancellation of title – Beneficiaries' equitable rights – Gifts intervivos – Standard of proof in civil cases.
18 August 2025
A buyer from a non-owner cannot acquire valid interest in customary family land absent due diligence or proper authority.
Land law – Customary tenure – Temporary use of family land – Gift intervivos – Consensus ad idem in contract – Due diligence – Validity of sale – Miscarriage of justice on appeal.
15 August 2025
Failure to timely deliver transfer documents entitled the purchaser to rescind the sale and obtain a full refund with interest.
Contract – breach – sale of land – time of the essence – rescission – agency – refund of deposit – specific performance – interest and costs – counterclaim dismissed.
15 August 2025
A court granted stay of execution pending appeal where substantial loss was demonstrated and the application was undefended.
Civil procedure – Stay of execution – Pending appeal – Substantial loss – Security for due performance – Unopposed application – Requirements for grant of stay.
8 August 2025
An application for redress regarding unavailable trial records was dismissed for having been brought against a non-juristic party and in the wrong forum.
Civil procedure – parties – non-suit against a non-juristic person – requirement to sue the Attorney General in suits against government; Criminal appeals – missing or unavailable record of proceedings – proper forum for redress – authority of appellate court to order retrial or reconstruction of record.
8 August 2025
A stay of execution was refused where no substantive appeal existed and legal requirements were not met by the applicant.
Civil procedure – stay of execution – conditions required for grant – absence of substantive appeal – delay – security for due performance – proof of irreparable loss – abuse of process.
8 August 2025
A probate extension application was denied for failing to obtain all beneficiary consents and for improper delegation of duties.
Succession law – extension and renewal of probate – requirements for further extension – necessity of compliance with original grant conditions – need for consent from all beneficiaries – non-delegable duties of executor – sufficiency of cause for delay.
8 August 2025
July 2025
Estate administrators may only be bound by advocate-client fee claims where joint instructions are proven and due process is observed.
Administration of estates – capacity of administrators to challenge bills of costs – taxation and execution – necessity of joint instructions from administrators – proof of service – right to a fair hearing – setting aside irregular bills of costs and execution orders.
29 July 2025

 

10 July 2025

 

10 July 2025

 

9 July 2025

 

8 July 2025

 

8 July 2025

 

2 July 2025
June 2025
Leave to appeal granted on legal issues surrounding garnishee procedures, fair hearing, and attachability of central bank statutory reserves.
Civil procedure – garnishee orders – whether garnishee order absolute may be issued against non-party without garnishee nisi proceedings or hearing – statutory construction – attachability of central bank statutory reserves – right to fair hearing – preliminary objections as to contempt, non-appealability, and abuse of process – grant of leave to appeal on substantial questions of law.
30 June 2025
Leave to appeal granted where dismissal for late service raised substantial questions on jurisdiction, procedural fairness, and garnishee enforcement.
Civil procedure – Leave to appeal – Substantial question of law – Garnishee orders – Procedural default versus substantive justice – Jurisdiction of issuing court – Binding effect of orders on non-parties – Alleged contempt and audience before the court.
30 June 2025
Leave to appeal granted where procedural defects and fair hearing rights raise substantial constitutional and legal questions.
Civil Procedure – leave to appeal – interlocutory orders – effect of procedural irregularities – right to fair hearing – absence of judicial finding of contempt – Article 28 and 126(2)(e) of the Constitution – whether omission of court seal is fatal defect – preliminary objections dismissed.
30 June 2025

 

30 June 2025

 

26 June 2025

 

26 June 2025

 

26 June 2025

 

24 June 2025

 

10 June 2025
May 2025

 

30 May 2025
A court grants an interim stay of execution to preserve the status quo pending the outcome of a main stay application.
Civil procedure – Interim stay of execution – Requirements – Competence of notice of appeal – Imminent threat of execution – Discretion of court to preserve status quo.
27 May 2025

 

19 May 2025

 

19 May 2025