High Court of Uganda

The High Court of Uganda is the third court of record in order of hierarchy and has unlimited original jurisdiction, which means that it can try any case of any value or crime of any magnitude. Appeals from all Magistrates Courts go to the High Court. 

The High Court is headed by the Honorable Principal Judge who is responsible for the administration of the court and has supervisory powers over Magistrate's courts. 

Physical address
Plot 2, the Square Kampala
40 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
40 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 1994

 

5 December 1994
November 1994
High Court finds military remand lawful; habeas corpus dismissed and it cannot order the military court to grant bail.
Habeas corpus — inquiry into lawfulness of detention under Judicature Act; return showing charges and remand by General Court Martial. Military jurisdiction — General Court Martial empowered to try service offences under NRA statute. Detention delays — statutory reporting and petition remedies (reports after 7 days, petition after 23 days, release after 90 days); detention under 90 days not automatically unlawful. Civilian interference — High Court cannot direct military court to grant bail.
15 November 1994
Writ of Habeas Corpus application dismissed due to lawful detention under General Court Martial jurisdiction.
Habeas Corpus - military detention - jurisdiction of military courts - procedural delay in charging detainee
15 November 1994
October 1994

 

26 October 1994
Court appointed the natural mother as guardian of her infant's property for welfare enhancement.
Guardianship – appointment of guardian – infant's welfare paramount – property management for minor's benefit.
21 October 1994

 

21 October 1994

 

20 October 1994
Plaintiff’s claim for unpaid cotton and travel expenses dismissed for failure to prove indebtedness at formal proof.
Contract — Sale of goods (cotton) — Proof of debt in default judgment/formal proof — necessity of documentary evidence (delivery notes, statement of account) — recoverability of special damages (transport/subsistence).
20 October 1994

 

12 October 1994
September 1994

 

7 September 1994

 

7 September 1994
August 1994

 

22 August 1994
June 1994

 

22 June 1994

 

22 June 1994

 

21 June 1994

 

10 June 1994
Conviction quashed where theft of cash was unproven, unsworn statement unfairly criticised and sentence improperly imposed.
Criminal law – theft – whether prosecution proved accused handled or converted complainant's money as charged – conviction cannot be founded on inference from sale of goods when charge alleges theft of cash. Criminal procedure – unsworn statement – accused must not be penalised for electing to make an unsworn statement; trial court must not improperly discredit it. Civil v criminal remedy – disputes over failed business ventures/debts are primarily civil matters and should not be enforced by criminal prosecution. Sentencing – fine imposed without inquiry into means and used as compensation is improper; sentencing must be reasoned and within statutory limits (Magistrates Courts Act).
10 June 1994
May 1994
Court holds widow entitled to estate over father's objection, upholding both customary and Islamic marriages.
Family Law – Administration of Estates – Widow’s entitlement to letters of administration – Validity of customary and Islamic marriages.
25 May 1994
Accused convicted of defiling two children; police confession excluded but child testimony and corroboration proved guilt.
Criminal law – Defilement – Elements: victim under 18 and unlawful sexual intercourse; Evidence – admissibility of cautioned/confession statements; Evidence – weight and reliability of medical reports; Evidence of children and corroboration – unsworn child statements, competency, and independent corroboration; Alibi – evidential burden and assessment of credibility.
25 May 1994

 

18 May 1994
April 1994
Criminal conviction quashed due to insufficient evidence proving intent to defraud under false pretences.
Criminal law - obtaining money by false pretences - distinction between civil and criminal wrongs - evaluation of evidence.
29 April 1994

 

13 April 1994
March 1994
Advanced age (68) held to be an "exceptional circumstance" under section 14A, bail granted with bonds and reporting conditions.
Bail — Section 14A Trial on Indictments Decree — exceptional circumstances required for offences triable only by High Court — "advanced age" qualifies as exceptional circumstance — proof of age (medical report, charge sheet) — requirement to satisfy court applicant will not abscond — sureties and reporting conditions.
21 March 1994
Advanced age (68) held to be an "exceptional circumstance" under section 14A(1), bail granted with conditions.
Criminal procedure – Bail under section 14A(1) Trial on Indictments Decree – "Exceptional circumstances" – advanced age – proof of age by charge sheet and medical report – requirement to show non‑absconding – bail conditions imposed.
21 March 1994
Bail refused under s14A despite long remand because sureties were inadequate and applicants had previously jumped bail.
Criminal procedure – Bail under section 14A of the Trial on Indictments Decree – prolonged remand (15 months) as exceptional circumstance; Sufficiency and number of sureties – adequacy relative to number of accused and seriousness of charge; Prior bail-jumping – relevance to risk of absconding and discretionary refusal of bail; Court’s discretion – balancing prolonged remand against risk of non‑appearance.
11 March 1994
Defective particulars and an equivocal plea rendered the conviction for driving without third‑party insurance a nullity; conviction quashed.
Criminal law – defective particulars of offence – need to state day, time and place with reasonable clearness (Magistrates' Court Act s36(g)); statutory requirement for third‑party insurance (Motor Vehicle Insurance (Third Party Risks) Statute s2(1)); equivocal plea – where reply is not a clear plea of guilty the magistrate must record not guilty; combined effect of bad charge and equivocal plea renders proceedings a nullity; appellate revisionary powers (Criminal Procedure Code s341(1)).
11 March 1994

 

9 March 1994

 

1 March 1994
February 1994

 

25 February 1994

 

14 February 1994
Plaintiff awarded damages for breach of contract after Ministry of Health failed to pay for supplied goods.
Contract Law – Breach of contract – Supply of goods – Non-payment – Ministry of Health contracts – Damages assessment.
9 February 1994
Court appointed the applicant (sister) as legal guardian of orphaned children, directing annual welfare reports to the Probation/Welfare Office.
Guardianship – Appointment of legal guardian under s.9 Judicature Act and Order 48 – Welfare of the child as paramount consideration. Appointment of a guardian resident abroad – suitability and supervisory conditions. Probation/Welfare Office oversight – annual progress reports and court notification if reports not received.
7 February 1994
4 February 1994

 

4 February 1994
Accused granted bail after court found special circumstances and State issued a Certificate of No Objection.
Criminal procedure – Bail – Special circumstances required under statute – Court may grant bail where State issues Certificate of No Objection and special circumstances are shown. Criminal procedure – Bail conditions – Cash bond, deposit of travel documents with court registry, mandatory periodic reporting to police. Sureties – Court to assess sufficiency of sureties to ensure accused’s return to court.
4 February 1994

 

4 February 1994
January 1994

 

21 January 1994
Contractor entitled to unpaid certificate sum; court awarded principal plus 30% p.a. interest from due date and costs.
Contract law – Government contract – final certificate and obligation to pay within 14 days (Clause 30(1)); Civil procedure – proceeding and judgment after hearing where Attorney‑General served but did not appear; Interest – appropriateness of contractual/claimed rate versus court‑assessed commercial rate; Evidence – uncontroverted plaintiff testimony establishes entitlement.
12 January 1994
Plaintiff entitled to certified contract sum; court awards principal, interest at 30% p.a. from 15/3/1989, and costs.
Contract law – obligation to pay sums certified by final payment certificate – payment due within contractual 14-day period. Evidence – uncontroverted testimony and documentary final certificate sufficient to establish debt. Remedies – assessment of interest where claimed contractual rate unsupported; court discretion to fix reasonable rate (30% p.a.). Costs – successful claimant entitled to costs where defendant defaults or fails to contest.
12 January 1994

 

3 January 1994