High Court of Uganda

The High Court of Uganda is the third court of record in order of hierarchy and has unlimited original jurisdiction, which means that it can try any case of any value or crime of any magnitude. Appeals from all Magistrates Courts go to the High Court. 

The High Court is headed by the Honorable Principal Judge who is responsible for the administration of the court and has supervisory powers over Magistrate's courts. 

Physical address
Plot 2, the Square Kampala
40 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
40 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 1993

 

23 December 1993
Defendant vicariously liable for collision; plaintiff awarded repair costs plus limited loss-of-use and general damages, with costs and interest.
Tort — Negligence — Road traffic collision — Motor vehicle entering main road from adjacent road — Vicarious liability of owner for driver’s negligence. Quantum — Special damages — Proof of repair costs by receipt; admissibility and challenge to garage receipt. Damages — Loss of use/loss of earnings — duty to mitigate; claimant must prove reasonable repair period to recover full non-use damages. Remedies — Award of repair costs, limited loss-of-earnings, general damages for inconvenience, costs and interest.
22 December 1993

 

20 December 1993
Court referred whether election rules restricting campaigning breach Articles 8, 17, 18 and 20 of the Constitution to Constitutional Court.
Constitutional law – Election rules – Whether provisions restricting public campaigning and regulating candidates’ meetings contravene freedoms of expression, assembly and association and non-discrimination (Articles 8, 17, 18, 20) – Reference to Constitutional Court under Article 87 and Rule 3(2).
14 December 1993
Whether specified Constituent Assembly Election Rules infringe fundamental rights and require referral to the Constitutional Court.
Constitutional procedure – referral under Article 87 and Rule 3(2) – whether trial court must refer substantial questions of constitutional interpretation to Constitutional Court; Constitutional rights – freedom of expression, assembly and association (Articles 8, 17, 18) and non-discrimination (Article 20) – challenge to election rules limiting campaigning and meetings; sufficiency of affidavits to ground a reference.
14 December 1993
Circumstantial evidence raising suspicion cannot sustain a murder conviction where a reasonable alternative hypothesis exists.
Criminal law – Murder – essential ingredients: death, unlawful causation, causation by accused, malice aforethought. Circumstantial evidence – conviction only where facts are inconsistent with innocence and exclude all reasonable alternative hypotheses. Reasonable doubt – mere suspicion, however strong, insufficient to convict; benefit of doubt where a third party’s involvement is plausible.
6 December 1993
Victim’s age and unlawful intercourse proved, but insufficient forensic linkage to convict accused of defilement; convicted of attempt to defile.
Criminal law – Defilement – Elements: proof of sexual intercourse, age under 18, unlawfulness and identity. Evidence – Medical opinion – weight limited where conventional procedures not followed. Evidence – Corroboration – eyewitness account and victim credible but need for forensic linking evidence. Proof beyond reasonable doubt – suspicion insufficient to convict on full offence; conviction for attempt where applicable.
6 December 1993
Section 1 notice under Act 20 of 1969 not required for Article 22(1) constitutional rights applications; S.I. No.26/1992 governs procedure.
Constitutional procedure – Article 22(1) jurisdiction for enforcement of fundamental rights – Article 22(5) rule‑making power – Section 1, Civil Procedure and Limitation (Misc. Provisions) Act 1969 inapplicable to Article 22 applications – validity and sufficiency of statutory notice – Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (Enforcement Procedure) Rules 1992 (S.I. No.26 of 1992).
2 December 1993
November 1993
Court appointed joint guardians and imposed safeguards for sale and management of an infant’s land to protect educational interests.
Guardianship of infant’s estate – Section 9 Judicature Act – appointment and control of guardians; sale of land registered in minor’s name – Court approval and safeguards; Public Trustee cannot be joint trustee; proceeds to be banked and applied to infant’s education; half‑yearly reporting to Court.
24 November 1993

 

23 November 1993
Local agent not liable where contract was with foreign manufacturer and claimed special damages were unproven.
Contract law – formation (offer, acceptance, consideration) – privity of contract; Agency – local agent's assistance/indent transmission does not make agent a contracting party; Delivery delays – statements of expected delivery times are informational unless contracted; Damages – special damages require strict, cogent proof.
5 November 1993
Allegations of fraud in a counterclaim must include specific particulars (facts, dates, sums) or be struck out.
Pleadings — Allegation of fraud — Order 6 r.2 Civil Procedure Rules requires particulars (facts, dates, sums) when claiming fraud or misrepresentation; vague allegations like "tricks and strategies" insufficient to disclose cause of action; failure to particularise fraud is a fundamental defect justifying striking out; costs awarded to successful preliminary objector.
5 November 1993
October 1993

 

26 October 1993

 

22 October 1993

 

20 October 1993

 

18 October 1993
The court evaluates and rules on breach of contract and proper remuneration in a subcontractor agreement.
Contract Law – breach of contract – determination of liability – adequacy of performance and remuneration evaluation under subcontractor agreements.
18 October 1993
September 1993

 

15 September 1993
On revision the court set aside an excessive default sentence and substituted the lawful one-month default imprisonment.
Criminal law – sentencing – default imprisonment for unpaid fines – statutory maximum under s.192(d) Magistrates Courts Act – illegality of excessive default sentence – revisional correction.
9 September 1993

 

2 September 1993
August 1993

 

30 August 1993

 

26 August 1993

 

26 August 1993

 

26 August 1993
Court restrained title registration pending resolution of a dispute over succession and beneficiaries’ caveat.
Succession law – certificate of succession – dispute over extent of estate and right to deal with residual land. Land registration – caveat – interim restraint on Registrar of Titles pending determination of ownership. Interim relief – preservation of status quo, risk of irreparable harm where registration would defeat pending litigation.
26 August 1993
July 1993

 

27 July 1993

 

20 July 1993

 

5 July 1993
June 1993
Court awarded 16 million shillings for severe burn injuries and 60% permanent disability to a minor.
Personal injury — General damages — Severe burns to a minor resulting from fallen transmission lines — Medical report and court observation — Permanent disability assessed at 60% and probable impotence — Quantum determined by recent local authorities rather than strict dollar conversion — Award of Shs.16,000,000 plus interest and costs.
4 June 1993
A minor electrocuted by a fallen transmission line awarded Shs 16,000,000 for severe injuries and 60% permanent disability.
Personal injury — electrocution and burns — assessment of general damages for pain, suffering and loss of amenities; permanent disability assessed at 60%; impotence likely though not conclusively proved; minor plaintiff; quantum guided by recent local authorities rather than strict dollar conversion.
4 June 1993
Court awarded substantial damages for severe electrocution burns to a minor, assessing 60% permanent disability and probable impotence.
Personal injury – electrocution and burns – assessment of general damages – permanent disability (60%) and probable impotence – dollar-conversion formula as guide, not mechanical rule – reliance on recent local authorities.
4 June 1993
May 1993

 

13 May 1993
The suit to reclaim government-controlled land under the Expropriated Properties Act, based on expired lease, was dismissed.
Property Law – Expropriated Properties Act – applicability to corporate trustees – lease expiration and repossession rights.
10 May 1993
Death proved and unlawful killing established, but provocation negated malice; conviction reduced to manslaughter and sentenced with remand credit.
Homicide — distinction between murder and manslaughter — requirement for malice aforethought; role of provocation in reducing murder to manslaughter. Evidence — dying declaration and eyewitness testimony may suffice to prove death and causation even without tendered post‑mortem report. Defences — provocation can reduce culpability; self‑defence requires proportionality and reasonable apprehension of death or grievous harm. Sentence — credit for time on remand when passing custodial sentence.
3 May 1993
March 1993

 

3 March 1993
Court appointed applicant guardian with authority to manage and deal with infant's land for the infant's benefit under court supervision.
Guardianship – appointment under section 9(a) of the Judicature Act; Infant property – management, development and disposal powers (mortgage, lease, sale) for infant's benefit; Court supervision – safeguarding infant's paramount interest when granting contractual powers to guardian.
3 March 1993
February 1993
Court granted adoption without parental consent due to circumstances, ensuring the child's best interest.
Adoption law - compliance with statutory requirements - best interest of the child - consent waiver due to absence.
26 February 1993

 

16 February 1993
January 1993
A caveat must be backed by a protectable interest; respondents lacked such interest, so caveats were removed.
Land law – Caveat – Validity requires a protectable legal or equitable interest (s.148 RTA); Administrator‑General’s distribution and issuance of succession/letters; registration by successors; beneficiaries carved out by distribution lack protectable interest to support caveats; related suit by a minor does not validate caveats not lodged on the minor’s behalf.
19 January 1993
Application for temporary injunction to seize disputed vehicle dismissed for failure to show irreparable harm and balance of convenience.
Civil procedure — Temporary injunction (Order 37 r.1) — Requirements: prima facie case, irreparable injury, balance of convenience — Possession dispute over motor vehicle — Need for affidavit/evidence of risk of wasting or vandalisation — Application dismissed; vehicle remains with defendant.
1 January 1993