High Court of Uganda

The High Court of Uganda is the third court of record in order of hierarchy and has unlimited original jurisdiction, which means that it can try any case of any value or crime of any magnitude. Appeals from all Magistrates Courts go to the High Court. 

The High Court is headed by the Honorable Principal Judge who is responsible for the administration of the court and has supervisory powers over Magistrate's courts. 

Physical address
Plot 2, the Square Kampala
80 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
80 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
September 2024

 

19 September 2024

 

16 September 2024

 

5 September 2024
August 2024

 

28 August 2024

 

12 August 2024
July 2024

 

19 July 2024

 

19 July 2024

 

18 July 2024

 

11 July 2024

 

11 July 2024

 

10 July 2024

 

8 July 2024

 

8 July 2024

 

5 July 2024

 

5 July 2024

 

5 July 2024

 

5 July 2024

 

5 July 2024

 

5 July 2024

 

3 July 2024

 

3 July 2024

 

3 July 2024

 

3 July 2024

 

3 July 2024

 

3 July 2024

 

3 July 2024
June 2024

 

26 June 2024

 

25 June 2024

 

21 June 2024

 

21 June 2024

 

21 June 2024

 

14 June 2024

 

10 June 2024

 

4 June 2024
May 2024

 

30 May 2024

 

29 May 2024

 

29 May 2024

 

22 May 2024
Leave to appeal denied where applicant failed to show arguable grounds against reinstating a dismissed appeal.
Civil procedure – Leave to appeal under section 98 and Order 44 – Reinstatement of dismissed appeal – Exercise of judicial discretion – Service of process and invocation of article 126(2)(e) – Abuse of court process.
21 May 2024

 

20 May 2024
14 May 2024

 

13 May 2024
Appeal dismissed: land claim time-barred and respondent declared owner by adverse possession; costs awarded.
Limitation Act (s.5, s.16) – actions to recover land – twelve-year limitation; adverse possession – animus possidendi, open and continuous possession; Order 7 r.11(d) CPR – plaint barred by law; appellate duty to re-evaluate evidence; costs follow the event.
9 May 2024

 

9 May 2024
Appellant failed to prove customary marriage or family land; sale by vendor valid and purchaser lawfully entitled to remedies.
* Customary marriage – proof and formalities – bride price, witnesses and documentary evidence required to establish a valid customary marriage; mere cohabitation insufficient. * Family/matrimonial land – definition and tests under the Land Act (ordinary residence; source of sustenance; cultural treatment) and requirement of evidence of contribution/occupation. * Sale of land – purchaser’s title where vendor is sole owner; spousal consent not required absent valid marriage or proven family land interest. * Appellate review – first appellate court duty to re-evaluate evidence; interference only where miscarriage of justice shown.
9 May 2024

 

7 May 2024

 

7 May 2024
April 2024
High Court revised Magistrate’s dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, set aside ruling and remitted the suit to High Court for determination.
Civil procedure – Revision under s.83 CPA – Magistrate’s exercise of jurisdiction; dismissal for lack of pecuniary jurisdiction where claim within jurisdiction; duty to refer/transfer matters involving High Court-only reliefs (cancellation of title); exercise of supervisory powers of High Court.
30 April 2024
High Court struck out later-filed suit as lis pendens and abuse of process; arbitration referral was premature.
* Arbitration law – referral under section 5 Arbitration and Conciliation Act requires a filed defence and closed pleadings; referral premature otherwise. * Arbitration – question whether clause is inoperative or incapable of performance requires evidence on alleged frustration. * Civil procedure – lis pendens (section 6 Civil Procedure Act) – suit struck out where matters are directly and substantially the same as those in a pending appeal. * Civil procedure – abuse of court process and multiplicity of suits – forum shopping and risk of double recovery. * Procedure – citing incorrect statutory provision may be technical but does not necessarily defeat substantive relief.
30 April 2024
Threatened felling of protected Mvule trees violated environmental rights; temporary injunction and declarations granted with consultation safeguards.
Environmental rights – threat to right to a clean and healthy environment; protected urban trees (Milicia excelsa/Mvule); lack of meaningful public participation; precautionary principle and sustainable development; temporary injunction with mandatory consultation (Uganda Forest Authority, NEMA, NGOs).
30 April 2024