High Court of Uganda

The High Court of Uganda is the third court of record in order of hierarchy and has unlimited original jurisdiction, which means that it can try any case of any value or crime of any magnitude. Appeals from all Magistrates Courts go to the High Court. 

The High Court is headed by the Honorable Principal Judge who is responsible for the administration of the court and has supervisory powers over Magistrate's courts. 

Physical address
Plot 2, the Square Kampala
25 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
25 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
November 1996

 

8 November 1996

 

7 November 1996

 

4 November 1996
Guilty plea to manslaughter accepted, sentence reduced due to provocation and time in custody.
Criminal Law – Manslaughter – Guilty plea accepted – Consideration of provocation and custodial period in sentencing.
4 November 1996
August 1996
Petition struck off for being filed at the wrong High Court registry; Rule 5(6) mandatory and Rule 10(2) requires prior court direction.
Election law – Election petition filing – Rule 5(6) mandatory requirement to present petition at the district registry covering the constituency; Election law – Trial venue – Rule 10(2) allows trial outside registry area only upon prior court direction for special reasons; Civil procedure – Technical objections – Rule 26 inapplicable where petition improperly presented.
30 August 1996

 

21 August 1996

 

19 August 1996

 

15 August 1996
High Court grants bail under section 51(4) TID due to trial delays from absent witnesses, enforcing specific conditions.
Criminal Procedure - Bail pending trial - Section 51(4) Trial on Indictment Decree - Conditions for bail admittance - Delayed trial due to absence of witnesses.
14 August 1996

 

12 August 1996
The accused was acquitted due to weak identification evidence and failure to establish a prima facie case.
Criminal law – Defilement – Essential elements of the offence – Prima facie case – Weak identification evidence.
8 August 1996

 

1 August 1996
July 1996
Medical proof of penetration without corroboration of a child’s unsworn identification is insufficient to convict for defilement.
* Criminal law – Defilement – Elements: victim’s age, penetration, identity of perpetrator. * Evidence – Child witness unsworn testimony requires corroboration under the Oath Act. * Medical evidence – Hymenal rupture establishes penetration but does not alone corroborate identification of the assailant. * Burden of proof – Prosecution must prove every essential element beyond reasonable doubt.
29 July 1996
Accused convicted of kidnapping with intent to murder; s.235(2) presumption applied and compulsion defence failed, sentenced to four years.
Criminal law – Kidnapping with intent to murder – Elements and burden of proof; statutory presumption under s.235(2) where victim not seen for six months; defence of compulsion (s.16) requires threat of instant death or grievous bodily harm; assessment of witness inconsistencies and sentencing discretion for first offenders.
29 July 1996

 

17 July 1996

 

16 July 1996

 

16 July 1996

 

16 July 1996
May 1996

 

27 May 1996

 

27 May 1996
April 1996
Adjournment refused where plaintiff's work commitments and absent witnesses did not amount to sufficient cause; suit dismissed under O.9 r.19.
* Civil procedure — Adjournment — Discretion under Order 15 r.1 — Applicant must show sufficient cause. * Civil procedure — Non-appearance of parties/witnesses — Absence despite notification not sufficient without explanation. * Civil procedure — Dismissal for non-prosecution — Order 9 r.19 invoked; costs awarded to defendants.
26 April 1996

 

22 April 1996
January 1996

 

2 January 1996

 

2 January 1996

 

2 January 1996