|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| November 2025 |
|
|
Applicants failed to show arguable grounds for leave to appeal a reinstatement order setting aside a dismissal.
* Civil procedure – Leave to appeal – Applicant must show arguable grounds/prospects of success for leave to appeal (Order 44 r2).
* Civil procedure – Service of interlocutory processes – court’s power to enlarge time; leave to serve out of time (section 96; Order 51 r6).
* Civil procedure – Dismissal under Order 9 r17 and setting aside under Order 9 r18 – sufficient cause and exercise of discretion.
* Evidence – Alleged hearsay objection weakened where decision rests on non-notification and court record.
* Abuse of process – Re-litigating an issue already determined by trial court may constitute abuse.
|
10 November 2025 |
|
Acquittal for aggravated defilement due to insufficient, uncorroborated and medically inconclusive prosecution evidence.
* Criminal law – Sexual offences – Aggravated defilement – prima facie case requirement under Section 74(1) Trial on Indictments Act; Bhatt v R test. * Evidence – Child complainant evidence – need for corroboration and caution. * Medical evidence – hymenal absence without tears or semen is inconclusive; delay in reporting undermines forensic corroboration. * Evidence Act s30 – limits on admissibility of out-of-court statements in the absence of applicable exception.
|
10 November 2025 |
|
Appellant proved lineage title; respondents failed to prove acquisition and were adjudged trespassers; appeal allowed with costs.
Land law – ownership by lineage succession; burden of proof under Evidence Act; nemo dat quod non habet; failure to call key witness; trespass – unauthorized entry despite clan directive; striking out vague grounds of appeal.
|
10 November 2025 |
|
Appeal dismissed for lack of service of the memorandum and for want of prosecution; respondents ordered to pay costs.
Civil procedure – Appeals – Service of memorandum of appeal – falls within timelines for service of process (Order 49(2), Order 5(2)) – affidavit of service required; Civil procedure – Appeals – Want of prosecution – prolonged inaction amounts to abuse of process – dismissal justified; Civil procedure – Registrar’s role under Order 43 r.31 versus party application to dismiss for want of prosecution.
|
7 November 2025 |
|
An innocent URA error misattributing a TIN must be remedied via statutory data-protection procedures; no civil damages awarded.
Data protection – application of the Data Protection and Privacy Act to public bodies; misuse/misattribution of TINs; correction procedures (s.16) and administrative complaint to the Authority (s.31); Tax Procedures Act s.55/s.66 – offence of using false TIN; innocent administrative error rectified by URA does not automatically give rise to civil damages.
|
7 November 2025 |
|
An affidavit sworn before an advocate not authorised to practise is invalid and vitiates proceedings, warranting dismissal on revision.
* Administrative and procedural law – Commissioner of Oaths (Advocates) Act – only practising advocates with valid practising certificates may act as commissioners for oaths; commission terminates on ceasing to practise. * Evidence – Validity of affidavits – an affidavit sworn before a person not authorised to act as commissioner of oaths is invalid and vitiates proceedings. * Civil Procedure – Order 19 r 3(1) – a defective supporting affidavit goes to the root of the application. * Revision – High Court’s powers under section 83 of the Civil Procedure Act to set aside proceedings founded on invalid affidavits.
|
7 November 2025 |
|
Limitation and adverse possession do not defeat a spouse’s matrimonial property rights in a subsisting customary marriage.
Family law – Customary marriage – Property acquired during marriage presumed matrimonial property; Limitation Act and adverse possession do not extinguish a spouse’s declaratory claim to matrimonial interest while marriage subsists; transfers of matrimonial land without consultation or dissolution are legally defective.
|
7 November 2025 |
|
An appellate court will not disturb a trial court’s refusal to award costs absent demonstrated abuse or overlooked matters.
* Civil Procedure — Costs — section 27 Civil Procedure Act — costs generally follow the event but are in the court's discretion.
* Appellate review — interference with costs orders — only where discretion is not judiciously exercised or is abused.
* Burden on appellant to show overlooked matters or improper exercise of discretion.
|
7 November 2025 |
|
Applicant's transport difficulties and prompt action constituted sufficient cause to set aside dismissal and reinstate the appeal.
Civil procedure – Setting aside dismissal for non-appearance – Sufficient cause – Transport difficulties and counsel's engagement – Promptness in seeking redress – Article 126(2)(e) Constitution – Section 98 Civil Procedure Act – Section 33 Judicature Act – Right to be heard – Land disputes to be decided on merits.
|
6 November 2025 |
|
Mandamus granted to compel land registration where registrar failed to act on presented transfer instruments.
Administrative law – Judicial review – Mandamus to compel performance of statutory duty – Registration of titles – Registrar’s duty to enter dealings – Failure to act where transfer instruments presented – Unopposed affidavit evidence – General damages not awarded for lack of proof.
|
6 November 2025 |
|
Affidavits by the applicant’s State Attorneys were defective and Magistrates’ Court lacked jurisdiction under the Physical Planning Act; appeal dismissed.
Civil procedure – Affidavits – Order 19 Rule 3(1): affidavit must state facts within deponent’s knowledge or disclose source of information; hearsay inadmissible. Advocates – Professional conduct: counsel should not act as both advocate and witness in the same contentious matter. Administrative law – Physical Planning Act: internal multi‑tier review scheme culminating in High Court; exhaustion of administrative remedies and ouster of Magistrates’ Court jurisdiction for enforcement matters. Reinstatement – requires competent, properly supported application; absence of evidentiary foundation fatal.
|
6 November 2025 |
|
Applicant granted unconditional leave to defend amid triable disputes on service, quantum, illegality, fraud and security.
Civil procedure – summary suit – leave to appear and defend – discretion to enlarge time; service of summons – validity and affidavit of service; bona fide triable issues – fraud, forgery, misrepresentation, undue influence; disputed quantum and account; alleged unlicensed money‑lending and illegality of interest; disputed security and caveat; dual commissioning of affidavits – weight not fatal.
|
6 November 2025 |
|
Administrative delay by the lower court justified extending time for the applicant to file an appeal.
Civil procedure – extension of time to appeal – Section 79(1)(b), Section 96 and 98 Civil Procedure Act; Order 51 Rules – administrative delay in preparing certified records as sufficient cause; requirement that intended appeal be arguable; costs to abide outcome.
|
6 November 2025 |
|
Revision under section 83 unavailable where decision is appealable; proper remedy is an appeal, not revision.
Civil Procedure Act s.83 – Revision limited to jurisdictional defects, illegality or material irregularity; Appeal vs revision – decisions requiring review of evidence are appealable; Matrimonial home/children’s interests – trial court discretion to protect children’s housing needs.
|
5 November 2025 |
|
First accused convicted on positive identification; second accused acquitted for lack of evidence of participation.
Criminal law – Aggravated robbery – Elements: theft, threat/use of violence, deadly weapon – Identification evidence and alibi – Common intention – Acquittal where participation not proved.
|
5 November 2025 |
|
Stay of execution granted pending appeal after applicant showed substantial loss, promptness and arguable grounds; no security required.
Civil procedure – stay of execution pending appeal; requirements: substantial loss, promptness, arguable appeal, security for due performance; contract dispute; execution of decree for payment; discretion not to order security to protect right of appeal.
|
4 November 2025 |
|
Late witness statement retained; plaint not time-barred, surviving executrix has authority, and cause of action disclosed.
Civil procedure – witness statements – late expanded statement admitted where no new witness introduced and cross-examination possible; substantive justice prevails over technicality.
Limitation – continuing trespass – cause of action accrues from continuing occupation; Section 20 Limitation Act inapplicable to suits by estate to protect property.
Succession – Section 269 – powers of executors vest in surviving executrix; survivor may sue without co-executor consent.
Pleadings – Order 7 r.11 – plaint discloses cause of action; misnomer curable by amendment where identity clear.
|
4 November 2025 |
|
Applicant proved equitable interest; respondent’s title held fraudulently acquired; surrender of title and demolition ordered.
Land law – equitable interest arising on sale agreement – locus standi to sue – fraud vitiating registration – bona fide purchaser doctrine – requirement of due diligence and production of sale agreement – illegal erection of structures on access road – survey and demarcation remedy – damages and costs.
|
3 November 2025 |
|
Respondent’s answer can constitute a cross‑petition proving adultery, desertion and justifying divorce with custody and maintenance orders.
Divorce — grounds: adultery, desertion and psychological cruelty; respondent’s answer treated as cross‑petition; irretrievable breakdown since 2017; decree nisi, custody, visitation and maintenance awarded; guilty party doctrine considered.
|
3 November 2025 |
|
Court allowed limited amendment to plaint to include subsequent criminal conviction; evidentiary weight to be decided at trial.
Civil procedure – amendment of pleadings – Section 100 Civil Procedure Act and Order 6 Rule 19 – amendment to include subsequent criminal judgment – admissibility and evidential weight of foreign/related judgments to be determined at trial – prejudice and mala fides as grounds to refuse amendment.
|
3 November 2025 |
|
Extension of letters of administration granted for two years but conditioned on promptly filing the estate inventory and account.
Succession law – administrators’ duty to file inventory and account under s.273(1) – court’s discretion to extend time (Civil Procedure Act ss.96,98) – extension of Letters of Administration under s.337 – effect of pending related litigation and beneficiary consent – conditional renewal.
|
3 November 2025 |
|
An expired grant of letters of administration cannot be revoked; the former administrator must account and is restrained from dealing with the estate.
* Succession Act – validity of letters of administration – statutory two-year limit under s.256(2) – lapse by operation of law.
* Administration – revocation of grants – lapse of grant renders revocation moot.
* Duty to account – administrators must exhibit inventory and statement of account for period of authority.
* Remedies – injunctions, fresh application for letters, damages and costs where administrator interferes with estate.
|
3 November 2025 |
|
Appellate court affirms conviction and sentence for theft, finding sentence proportionate given aggravated breach of familial trust.
Criminal law – Theft – Sentencing – Breach of familial trust as aggravating factor; guilty plea and sentencing; appellate review of sentence; abandonment of unargued grounds on appeal.
|
3 November 2025 |
|
Disagreement with an expert valuation does not amount to an error apparent on the face of the record.
Civil procedure — Review under s.82 CPA & Order 46 — Challenge to government valuer’s report — Standard: manifest/error apparent on face of record; valuation as expert opinion; functus officio and contemnor objections considered.
|
3 November 2025 |
| October 2025 |
|
|
Possession supported by prior sale agreements shifts burden to challenger; distribution deeds cannot establish title without letters of administration.
Land law – ownership and possession – burden of proof where possessor shown to be owner (Evidence Act s.110); Succession law – distribution deeds insufficient to establish title absent letters of administration (Succession Act s.187); recovery of land versus trespass; evidential value of earlier sale agreements; due diligence when buying family/shared land.
|
31 October 2025 |
|
Court allowed the applicant an extension to file an appeal, finding sufficient cause despite a lengthy delay.
* Civil procedure – extension of time to appeal – Section 79(1)(b) Civil Procedure Act – "good cause" discretion.
* Civil procedure – computation of limitation – Section 79(2) excludes time to obtain copies of decree/record.
* Civil procedure – appeals to High Court – Order XLIII Rules 1–2: appeal must be by memorandum with concise grounds.
* Execution/taxation – enlargement of time to appeal does not automatically stay execution; stay requires express order.
|
31 October 2025 |
|
Alleged lack of company resolution for a judgment affidavit is an appealable admissibility issue, not grounds for revision.
Revision — Civil Procedure Act s.83(1) — limited revisional jurisdiction; material irregularity or illegal exercise of jurisdiction required — admissibility/authority to swear affidavit vs jurisdiction — company authority to sue — default judgment in summary proceedings.
|
31 October 2025 |
|
Circumstantial evidence, recovered stolen property and flight established the accused’s guilt for murder and aggravated robbery.
Criminal law – Murder – malice aforethought established by multiple repeated blunt-force head injuries and attendant circumstances; Aggravated robbery – theft, violence and possession/use of deadly weapon proved by recovery of victim’s property; Evidence – circumstantial and res gestae evidence, burden and standard of proof; Alibi – requirement that prosecution disprove alibi by placing accused at scene; Assessors’ opinion considered and adopted.
|
31 October 2025 |
|
Whether the prosecution proved aggravated defilement of a three‑year‑old beyond reasonable doubt and imposed an appropriate custodial sentence.
* Criminal law – Aggravated defilement – Elements: victim under 14, sexual act (penetration), accused’s participation – burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt. * Evidence – Medical evidence of vaginal tear and stitching corroborating sexual penetration; contemporaneous statements by child admissible as res gestae. * Evidence – Alibi and alternative explanations (fall from bicycle; accused’s chest injury) evaluated and rejected where inconsistent or uncorroborated. * Sentencing – Application of Sentencing Guidelines and precedents; aggravating factors (very young victim, familial relationship, severe injury) justify substantial custodial sentence; deduction for remand time.
|
30 October 2025 |
|
Penetration and non-consent proved, but identity of the assailant not established; accused acquitted.
* Criminal law – Rape – Ingredients: unlawful sexual intercourse, lack of consent, participation of accused; medical corroboration of penetration.
* Evidence – Identification – visual impairment and identification by matchlight; reliability and criminal standard of proof.
* Procedure – Investigative duty: police obligation to test/destroy alibi; effect of absent police testimony on prosecution case.
* Verdict – Where identity is not proved beyond reasonable doubt, accused must be acquitted despite proof of intercourse and non-consent.
|
29 October 2025 |
|
Intercourse and non‑consent proven, but unreliable identification and unrefuted alibi led to acquittal of the accused.
Criminal law – Rape – Elements: unlawful intercourse, lack of consent, accused’s participation – Identification evidence – visual impairment and limited lighting (matchbox) – medical corroboration of intercourse – alibi not disproved – failure to call police witnesses – acquittal.
|
29 October 2025 |
|
Insufficient proof of malice aforethought: murder acquittal but conviction for manslaughter and custodial sentence with remand credit.
* Criminal law – homicide – elements of murder: death, unlawful act, malice aforethought, causation. * Evidence – post‑mortem corroboration of assault and cause of death. * Mens rea – malice aforethought not inferred from non‑lethal force (fists/feet) against an elderly victim. * Defence – intoxication raised but not proved to negate intent. * Sentence – manslaughter; remand credit applied.
|
29 October 2025 |
|
Prosecution proved unlawful fatal assault but not intent to kill; accused acquitted of murder and convicted of manslaughter, sentenced accordingly.
Criminal law – Homicide – Causation and proof of death – Post-mortem evidence corroborating assault; Malice aforethought – Inference of intent where non-lethal force used – requirement for clear evidence; Intoxication defence – burden and when it negates specific intent; Conviction reduced from murder to manslaughter where intent to kill not proved; Sentencing – remand credit and comparative authorities.
|
29 October 2025 |
|
Single-witness identification and medical corroboration upheld conviction for rape; sentence reduced by remand credit.
* Criminal law – Rape – Ingredients: unlawful sexual intercourse, lack of consent, participation of accused – proof beyond reasonable doubt. * Identification – single identifying witness at night – reliability assessed on proximity, duration, lighting and corroboration. * Assessor’s opinion – trial judge may reject assessor’s dissent if unsupported by evidence. * Sentence – application of sentencing guidelines, mitigation, aggravation and remand credit.
|
29 October 2025 |
|
Applicant had prima facie case but failed to show irreparable harm; court restored status quo ante and allowed respondent temporary access.
* Civil procedure – Temporary injunctions – Test: prima facie case, irreparable injury, balance of convenience (E.L.T Kiyimba Kaggwa v Haji Katende Abdunasser).
* Property law – Access easement/disputed access road – long‑standing use and economic reliance of the user.
* Equity – Status quo vs status quo ante – court will not preserve an altered state created by self‑help.
* Inherent jurisdiction (s.98 Civil Procedure Act) – preservation of status quo ante pending final determination.
|
29 October 2025 |
|
Court held extension of letters of administration is judicial, granted a conditional 90‑day extension with strict accounting directions.
* Succession Act s.259 – extension of letters of administration – judicial, not administrative, function; formal application required. * Administration of estates – adequacy of inventory, requirement to account for rents and receipts. * Delegation – administrators cannot appoint agents to discharge their duties (delegatus non potest delegare). * Remedies – conditional short extension with strict directions; referral to Administrator‑General on noncompliance.
|
28 October 2025 |
|
Counterclaim alleging fraud struck out for lack of particulars and being time-barred; defendants' defences retained for trial.
Civil procedure – Pleading fraud – Particulars of fraud mandatory under Order 6 r.3 CPR; Limitation – actions to recover land barred after 12 years (Limitation Act s.5); Striking out pleadings – counterclaim struck out for failure to disclose cause of action, defences retained as raising triable issues.
|
28 October 2025 |
|
Applicant entitled to contract price and proven loan interest and damages for respondent’s non‑payment of completed works.
* Contract law – breach of contract – non-payment for completed construction works – entitlement to contract price.* Evidence – burden of proof in civil cases – plaintiff must prove special damages specifically on the balance of probabilities.* Damages – recoverability of loan interest proven by bank demand notice; speculative loss claims disallowed.* Remedies – award of principal, proved special damages, general damages, interest and costs.
|
28 October 2025 |
|
Ineffective service justified setting aside the default judgment, but execution sale preserved absent fraud or material irregularity.
Service of summons — requirement of effective personal service or service on recognized agent; ineffective service justifies setting aside ex parte decree (Order 36 r.11). Summary procedure — defendant need only show bona fide triable issues, not full merits. Execution and judicial sale — can only be set aside for fraud, illegality or material irregularity causing substantial prejudice; mere inadequacy of price or procedural imperfections without proof of prejudice insufficient. Valuation and bailiff irregularities — must be supported with evidence to vitiate sale.
|
28 October 2025 |
|
Charges dismissed where accused detained 28 years, later fit for trial, and prosecution lost the Police file/indictment.
* Criminal procedure – pre-trial detention – fitness to plead – detention pending Ministerial orders after finding of incapacity; subsequent fitness to stand trial and implications for liberty.
* Abuse of process – gross want of prosecution where Police file/indictment lost and cannot be reconstructed after repeated adjournments.
* Court powers – Judicature Act and Trial on Indictments Act; inherent jurisdiction to discontinue prosecution to prevent oppression and protect right to fair hearing.
|
27 October 2025 |
|
High Court grants divorce for cruelty, awards custody and maintenance to the applicant, denies respondent property interest and orders vehicle transfer.
* Divorce jurisdiction – High Court’s concurrent jurisdiction in matrimonial causes where parties are Africans – Magistrates’ jurisdiction concurrent, not exclusive.
* Matrimonial grounds – cruelty established by protection order, contemporaneous records and panga incident; adultery not sufficiently proven.
* Children – best interests principle; primary custody to applicant, structured visitation, maintenance obligations.
* Property – certificate of title and evidence of sole contribution; no beneficial interest for respondent in registered land.
* Resulting trust – vehicle registered in respondent’s name held on resulting trust; transfer ordered.
* Costs – respondent ordered to pay taxed costs due to culpable conduct precipitating divorce.
|
27 October 2025 |
|
Applicants who benefited from sales cannot seek cancellation; court appointed the lawful widow as interim administrator to protect minors.
Succession — interim administration of estate; approbation and reprobation — beneficiary who benefited cannot seek cancellation; audi alteram partem — purchasers not joined; welfare of the child — paramount in estate administration; appointment of interim administrator (widow).
|
27 October 2025 |
|
A dismissal under Section 17(2) of the Judicature Act for want of prosecution is final and not restorable; appeal is the remedy.
Civil procedure — inherent powers — Section 17 Judicature Act — dismissal for want of prosecution — prolonged mediation and inactivity as abuse of process — dismissal under s17(2) is a final decree and not restorable; remedy by appeal.
|
27 October 2025 |
|
Appeal dismissed: later suit barred by res judicata because the same land and issues were previously decided.
Civil procedure – Res judicata – Section 7 Civil Procedure Act – claim preclusion; same parties, same matter directly and substantially in issue; kibanja v registered land; preliminary objection; appellate reappraisal of pleadings.
|
27 October 2025 |
|
Interlocutory default judgment set aside as plaint sought non-pecuniary relief; late defence validated and matter restored for hearing.
* Civil Procedure – Default/interlocutory judgment – Order 9 Rule 8 – scope limited to debt, detinue or pecuniary damages only – interlocutory judgment irregular where plaint seeks declarations or enhanced/exemplary damages.
* Civil Procedure – Setting aside default judgment – irregularity of procedure and nature of claim as ground for setting aside.
* Civil Procedure – Validation of belated defence/extension of time – administration of justice requires disputes be decided on merits where delay is excusable and uncontroverted.
* Mootness – related applications overtaken by events when default judgment set aside and defence validated.
|
27 October 2025 |
|
Applicant granted unconditional leave to defend summary suit due to bona fide triable issues and curable affidavit defects.
Civil procedure — Order 36 leave to appear and defend summary suit — requirement of bona fide triable issues; Order 52/affidavit requirements — one affidavit may suffice where competent to depose for all applicants; Annexures and Commissioner for Oaths formalities — technical defects curable under Article 126(2)(e); Evidence/admissibility — unstamped or incomplete agreement, privity of contract and vicarious liability are triable issues not suitable for summary disposal.
|
27 October 2025 |
|
Alleged fraudulent title challenged but plaintiffs failed to prove fraud or possession; suit dismissed.
• Limitation — discovery of fraud under s.25 Limitation Act delays start of limitation period.• Locus standi — beneficiaries/administrators may sue to protect intestate estate.• Impeachment of registered title — fraud must be pleaded with particulars and proved strictly to impeach certificate of title.• Evidence — hearsay and inconsistent oral testimony insufficient to establish gift or continuous possession.• Land law — Land Reform Decree 1975 reduced customary occupants to tenants at sufferance affecting claims predating registration.
|
27 October 2025 |
|
Whether a purported land sale was valid and a caveat alleging family interest constituted fraud and is removable.
* Land law – sale versus loan – parol evidence rule – written sale agreement conclusive of parties’ intentions; * Family land – definition under Section 39(4) of the Land Act – requirement of continuity of residence or sustenance; * Caveat law – caveat removable where no legally cognisable interest; * Fraud in civil law – dishonest conduct in land transactions justifying punitive damages and remedies.
|
24 October 2025 |
|
Court granted administrator extension to file estate inventory, accepting caregiving hardship as sufficient reason.
Succession law – Section 273(1) Succession Act – six‑month requirement to exhibit inventory – extension of time – family and caregiving hardship as sufficient cause.
|
24 October 2025 |
|
Defendant’s failure to pay and deliver unencumbered land amounted to fundamental breach; alleged novation unproven.
Contract law – exchange agreement – fundamental breach for failure to deliver agreed unencumbered land and consideration; Novation – burden of proof and admissibility of disputed document; Remedies – specific performance impracticable; substitutionary damages, general damages, interest and costs.
|
24 October 2025 |