High Court of Uganda

The High Court of Uganda is the third court of record in order of hierarchy and has unlimited original jurisdiction, which means that it can try any case of any value or crime of any magnitude. Appeals from all Magistrates Courts go to the High Court. 

The High Court is headed by the Honorable Principal Judge who is responsible for the administration of the court and has supervisory powers over Magistrate's courts. 

Physical address
Plot 2, the Square Kampala
49 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
49 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
November 2024

Contempt of court—Receivership—preliminary & detailed account reports—Insolvency Act—compliance with Court Orders—good faith—punitive sanctions—Consequential orders—costs—non-compliance

29 November 2024

Customary law—election of cultural leaders—declaratory Orders—self-executing Orders—injunctions—stay of execution pending appeal—mandatory conditions for stay of execution—substantial loss—imminent threat of execution—declaratory judgments—judicial discretion—consequential Orders—balance of hardship—appeal nugatory—procedural fairness

29 November 2024

 

28 November 2024

 

28 November 2024

 

28 November 2024

Negligence—ex parte proceedings—failure to tender evidence—witness statements—Order 18 Rule 5A CPR—procedural irregularities—judicial discretion—retrial ordered—nullification of judgment—miscarriage of justice—failure to formally adopt witness evidence—upholding procedural fairness in trials

28 November 2024

 

27 November 2024

 

26 November 2024

Judicial review—internal remedies—exhaustion of statutory appeal process—section 57 Cap 262—status quo preservation—dismissal of university staff—appointment and tenure—stay of execution—injunction—prohibition—balance of convenience—substantial loss—irreparable injury—abuse of court process—mootness doctrine—statutory mandate—appeal rights—costs.

25 November 2024

 

25 November 2024
25 November 2024

 

25 November 2024

 

25 November 2024

 

25 November 2024

 

25 November 2024
25 November 2024

 

25 November 2024

 

21 November 2024
Appellant's inconsistent pleadings and weak evidence led to dismissal and affirmation of the trial court's land ownership finding.
Civil procedure – time to appeal – Section 79(1) and 79(2) Civil Procedure Act – certified copy request freezes appeal period; Evidence – land ownership disputes – assessment of oral testimony, locus in quo and sketch map; Evidence – documentary exhibits must show attributes of ownership/possession to be probative; Pleadings – party bound by pleadings (Order 6 Rule 7 CPR) and departure from pleadings undermines credibility; Evaluation of credibility – consistency of witnesses and contradictions in defence.
19 November 2024
Applicant failed to prove title; respondent established ownership, caretaker status revoked, eviction, damages and costs affirmed.
Land law – proof of title and authenticity of conveyancing documents; forgery and invalid chain of title; caretaker/trustee versus owner; revocation of caretaking and actionable trespass; locus in quo — evidential role and non-fatal irregularity; award of general damages; eviction procedure and compliance with Practice Directions; costs follow the event.
14 November 2024
14 November 2024
Appellate court set aside magistrate’s decision, holding respondent failed to prove title and appellant’s possessory ownership upheld.
Civil procedure – grounds of appeal – generality of grounds – Order 43 rule 1(2) – striking out vague grounds; Limitation Act – s.5 and accrual of cause of action – claim within 12 years where plaint pleads trespass in 2012; Evidence – appellate re‑evaluation of witnesses – contradictions in pleadings and testimony; Property law – possession as prima facie evidence of title – burden on plaintiff to prove better title; Relief – setting aside trial judgment, dismissal, declaration of possessory ownership, costs.
14 November 2024
14 November 2024
Whether a purchaser without title can convey ownership and whether the second appellant committed trespass.
Land law – proof of ownership – admissibility and weight of sale and tenancy agreements (PE1, PE2) – recurring tenancy continues until valid notice of termination. Limitation – recovery of land – cause of action accrues on dispossession; trespass is a continuing tort. Transfer of title – nemo dat quod non habet: purchaser cannot acquire better title than vendor; sale from person without title is void. Trespass – claimant must prove unlawful entry or acts on land; mere reporting to police insufficient to establish trespass. Evidence – re-evaluation on first appeal where trial court findings tested against documentary and witness evidence.
14 November 2024
Respondent’s ownership upheld; 1st appellant’s purchase void for lack of title; 2nd appellant wrongly declared trespasser.
Land law – acquisition and proof of title – admissibility and effect of a tenancy agreement and sale agreement; Limitation Act – cause of action for recovery of land and continuing trespass; nemo dat – purchaser from person without title cannot acquire better title; trespass – requirement of actual entry or acts on land to constitute trespass; appellate re-evaluation of facts and evidence.
14 November 2024
Respondent’s purchase under recurring tenancy upheld; 1st appellant’s purchase from a person without title void; 2nd appellant wrongly declared trespasser.
Land law – proof of title – sale under recurring tenancy – tenancy continuing year-to-year until valid notice of termination – nemo dat ( purchaser cannot acquire better title than vendor ) – limitation Act (12 years) and continuing trespass – appellate re-evaluation of evidence – wrongful declaration of trespass against non-entrant – costs.
14 November 2024
14 November 2024

Civil Procedure—setting aside consent judgment—fraud—abuse of court process—estoppel—Advocate’s authority and conduct—Advocates (Professional Conduct) Regulations—client liability for advocate’s actions while holding brief

14 November 2024

 

14 November 2024
Applicant failed to prove all statutory conditions for a vesting order over registered land held in tenancy in common, so application dismissed.
Land law – Registration of Titles Act s.151 – vesting orders – conditions for grant: registered land; full purchase price paid; possession and vendor's acquiescence; transfer unexecuted because vendor dead or unavailable – tenancy in common prevents sole vesting absent evidence of other co‑owner’s divestiture.
11 November 2024
Whether delay in obtaining the trial record and COVID‑19 lockdowns amount to sufficient cause to allow an appeal out of time.
Civil procedure — extension of time — leave to appeal out of time — sufficient cause — delay in provision of certified trial record — COVID‑19 lockdowns as impediment — defective/premature memorandum of appeal struck out — costs: each party to bear own.
11 November 2024
8 November 2024
A non-party must prove legal grievance and sufficient nexus to seek review of a consent judgment allegedly affecting their land rights.
Civil procedure – review and setting aside of consent judgment – locus standi of non-party – requirements for establishing legal grievance – effect of parallel proceedings on consent orders – sufficiency of evidence to set aside consent judgment for fraud or collusion.
8 November 2024
8 November 2024

 

8 November 2024
8 November 2024
Appellate court found appellant lawful owner after re-evaluation, set aside trial judgment, ordered eviction and costs.
Land law – Boundary and title disputes – Possession versus proof of title – Validity of testamentary document under Succession Act s.50 – Re-evaluation of evidence on appeal – Remedies: declaration of ownership, injunction, vacant possession and eviction – Costs.
7 November 2024

 

7 November 2024
Claim to recover land dismissed as time-barred; amendment Rules did not apply retroactively.
Civil Procedure – commencement of statutory instrument – where no commencement date specified, commencement is date of Gazette publication (Interpretation Act s.17). Civil Procedure – summons for directions under CPR (Amendment) Rules 2019 – not applicable to suits filed before Rules’ commencement. Limitation – recovery of land – s.5 Limitation Act: 12-year bar applies; causes of action pleaded as arising in 1999 render 2019 suit time-barred. Limitation exceptions – allegations of fraud must be specifically pleaded with circumstances to displace limitation (Limitation Act s.25).
7 November 2024
A court may deny costs to a successful party to promote reconciliation given parties’ historical relationship and conduct.
Civil procedure — Costs — Discretion under section 27(1) Civil Procedure Act — Costs generally follow the event but may be denied for good cause — Promotion of reconciliation and pre-existing party relationship as legitimate factor in denying costs.
7 November 2024
Appeal allowed: appellant proved ownership; claim timely; respondent declared trespasser and ordered evicted with damages.
Land law – ownership dispute – evidence evaluation and burden on balance of probabilities. Limitation – cause of action accrual – pleadings determine when time begins to run under the Limitation Act. Succession evidence – requirements for a valid will (signature, witnesses, chain of custody) and evidential weight. Remedies – declaration of title, vacant possession, eviction, permanent injunction, general damages and costs.
7 November 2024
Undue delay and lack of satisfactory explanation justified refusal to amend pleadings or re-open the case.
Civil procedure – amendment of pleadings – Order 6 r 19 CPR – amendments allowed freely but subject to considerations: prejudice, undue delay, mala fides and fundamental change to the suit. Re-opening of case – discretionary – fresh evidence considered only where relevance, explanation for lateness, compatibility with pleadings and absence of prejudice established. Locus in quo and post‑hearing applications – late applications to fill gaps revealed at trial may be denied as mala fide and prejudicial.
7 November 2024
Grant revoked as inoperative due to deaths and insanity of co‑administrators; new grant and two‑year extension issued to surviving administrators.
Succession law – revocation of letters of administration – grant useless or inoperative where co-administrators die or become mentally incapable; re‑grant to surviving fit and proper administrators; extension of administration period.
6 November 2024

 

4 November 2024

 

4 November 2024

 

4 November 2024

 

4 November 2024
4 November 2024
4 November 2024