|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| October 2024 |
|
|
|
31 October 2024 |
|
|
31 October 2024 |
|
|
31 October 2024 |
|
The court found the plaintiff’s action barred by res judicata and granted title cancellation, an injunction and vacant possession.
* Civil procedure – Res judicata – claim and issue preclusion – where matter directly and substantially in issue in former suit between same parties or their privies, subsequent suit barred (s.7 CPA). * Consequential orders – court may grant orders (title cancellation, injunction, vacant possession) to give effect to prior judgment and avoid multiplicity of suits (s.33 Judicature Act). * Reliefs requiring fresh evidence (damages, mesne profits) cannot be granted on preliminary objection alone.
|
31 October 2024 |
|
Leave to appeal refused where applicant previously accepted jurisdiction and later raised dilatory jurisdictional objections.
Leave to appeal – criteria for grant: prospect of success or compelling reason; Magistrates’ Court jurisdiction – territorial jurisdiction and supervisory powers of Chief Magistrate to reallocate matters; Abuse of process/dilatory conduct – subsequent jurisdictional objections after accepting jurisdiction; Finality of litigation (interest rei publicae ut sit finis litium).
|
31 October 2024 |
|
|
31 October 2024 |
Traditional and cultural leadership – customary law – electoral procedures – declaration of vacancy – de-gazettement – injunction
|
31 October 2024 |
|
|
31 October 2024 |
|
Applicant granted leave to file appeal out of time due to procedural errors and lack of prejudice to respondent.
Civil procedure – Extension of time to file appeal – Sufficient cause test: length and reason for delay; arguability of appeal; prejudice to respondent – Procedural defects and counsel’s/representation errors may justify extension – Possession alone may not constitute irremediable prejudice.
|
30 October 2024 |
|
Court corrected a clerical omission of the deceased’s name on a grant under the slip rule.
Civil Procedure Act, s.99 (slip rule) – Correction of clerical errors – Omitted name on grant of letters of administration – Application by letter sufficient – Slip rule limited to evident, non-substantive errors.
|
30 October 2024 |
|
Applicant mother granted guardianship to mortgage her minor child's jointly held land for a family agricultural loan in the child's best interests.
Children law – Guardianship in respect of proprietary rights; Parens patriae; minors' contractual incapacity; best interests principle; mortgage of jointly registered family land.
|
30 October 2024 |
|
Vesting order under s.151 RTA requires proof of purchase, proprietor's death and direct transaction with registered proprietor.
Registration of Titles Act s.151 – vesting orders – requirements: registered land, full payment, possession and acquiescence, inability to obtain transfer due to vendor's death or absence; Civil procedure – suit against a dead person is a nullity; Evidence – need for proof of purchase agreement and death certificate before invoking section 151; Proper claimant – administrator/estate of intermediate purchaser where applicant did not transact with registered proprietor.
|
30 October 2024 |
|
Appellant confirmed owner: occupants of market stalls were licensees who could not pass land title; damages awards were improper and set aside.
Land law – ownership disputes – distinction between tenant/licensee (stall occupier) and proprietor; proof of title; damages – requirement to plead and prove special damages; limits of Magistrate Grade One pecuniary jurisdiction; appellate re-evaluation of credibility and evidence.
|
30 October 2024 |
|
Whether absence of a pre‑taxation meeting nullifies taxation and whether an awarded instruction fee was excessive.
* Advocates (Remuneration and Taxation of Costs) Regulations (SI No.7 of 2018) – Regulation 13A – pre‑taxation meeting requirement and its effect on validity of taxation. * Taxation procedure – purposive interpretation of mandatory provisions; consequences of non‑compliance. * Taxing officer’s powers – to proceed ex parte where a party defaults or frustrates pre‑taxation. * Assessment of instruction fees – minimums prescribed, judicial discretion, reduction of excessive fee.
|
30 October 2024 |
|
Failure to commence required proceedings within six months causes both caveat and petition for letters of administration to lapse.
Succession law – Succession Amendment Act 2022 s.255A – caveat and petition to lapse where required proceedings not commenced within six months – petitioner must sue to remove caveat; caveator must commence suit to prove objections; lapse and striking out as consequence.
|
30 October 2024 |
|
Review inappropriate where alleged error requires re‑evaluation of evidence; appeal is the proper remedy.
Civil procedure – Review – "Mistake or error apparent on the face of the record" must be self‑evident and not require re‑evaluation of evidence; review is not a substitute for appeal; limitation – date when cause of action arose (execution date) determinative for time bar.
|
30 October 2024 |
|
Advocate’s negligent failure to notice a counterclaim amounted to sufficient cause to allow a late reply.
Civil procedure – Counterclaim – Reply to counterclaim – Requirement to file within 15 days – Leave to file out of time – Sufficient cause – Advocate’s negligent mistake accepted as sufficient cause – Interests of justice where main suit and counterclaim concern same subject matter.
|
30 October 2024 |
|
A suit dismissed for non-appearance can be reinstated where bona fide mistake by counsel constitutes sufficient cause.
Civil procedure – Order 9 Rule 17 & 18 – reinstatement of dismissed suit; sufficient cause defined as excusable inability to take a required step; mistake/negligence of counsel can constitute sufficient cause if bona fide; court discretion to grant reinstatement but may refuse costs where litigant’s fault contributed.
|
30 October 2024 |
|
Disagreement over computation of filing time is an appeal matter; no error apparent on the record — review dismissed with costs.
* Civil procedure – Review – Order 46(1) CPR – grounds limited to new evidence, mistake apparent on face of record or other sufficient reason – error must be manifest and self-evident.
* Civil procedure – Computation of time – Order 36 CPR – disagreement with court’s computation is generally an appeal matter, not review.
* Procedure – Abuse of process – repeated or inappropriate applications where appeal is the proper remedy – costs awarded.
|
30 October 2024 |
|
Court stayed execution pending appeal, set aside irregular possession, and ordered UGX 2,000,000 security for costs.
* Civil procedure – Stay of execution – Order 43 rule 4(3): lodgment of appeal, substantial loss, no unreasonable delay, security for due performance.
* Appeal prospects – prima-facie case/likelihood of success on ownership issues.
* Execution – irregular/extra-judicial possession by RDC/local leaders set aside.
* Security for costs – appropriate lesser security where bill of costs untaxed.
|
30 October 2024 |
|
Similarity of facts with a civil suit does not automatically justify staying criminal proceedings; concurrent trials permitted.
Criminal procedure – Stay of criminal proceedings – Similarity of facts with pending civil suit not alone a ground for stay; criminal and civil cases may proceed concurrently; stay only in exceptional circumstances affecting fair hearing; DPP's public interest mandate.
|
30 October 2024 |
|
|
29 October 2024 |
|
|
29 October 2024 |
|
|
28 October 2024 |
|
|
28 October 2024 |
|
|
28 October 2024 |
|
|
28 October 2024 |
|
|
28 October 2024 |
|
|
28 October 2024 |
|
|
28 October 2024 |
|
Review of costs order failed because the applicant did not produce the impugned documents or prove a legal grievance.
* Civil procedure – Review of judgment – Section 82 Civil Procedure Act and Order 46 Rule 1 CPR – grounds for review (error apparent on face of record; discovery of new evidence).
* Evidence – Duty to prove legal grievance – Section 101 Evidence Act; requirement to exhibit documents in affidavits (Order 52 Rule 3 CPR).
* Costs – Challenge to taxation and notice to show cause – necessity of placing taxed bill and notice on record.
|
25 October 2024 |
|
|
25 October 2024 |
|
|
25 October 2024 |
|
|
25 October 2024 |
|
|
25 October 2024 |
|
|
25 October 2024 |
|
|
25 October 2024 |
|
Administrators of a deceased proprietor may have a caveat vacated where caveators fail to prove a gift inter vivos or other caveatable interest.
* Land law – Caveat – Whether caveator has proved a caveatable interest (gift inter vivos) – burden and proof requirements for gifts of registered land; * Registration of Titles – Certificate of title as conclusive proof of ownership; * Succession – Administrators’ locus to protect and administer estate property; * Remedies – Vacation of caveat and orders enabling Commissioner, Land Registration to implement court orders.
|
25 October 2024 |
|
High Court granted conditional stay of execution pending appeal, requiring 20% security for taxed costs and release to pursue appeal.
* Civil procedure – Stay of execution – Order 43 r.4 CPR and Section 98 CPA – criteria for grant of stay (lodgment of appeal, substantial loss, imminent execution, delay, security).
* Civil procedure – Competency of appeal – appealability of orders refusing to set aside dismissal under Order 9 r.23 and Order 44 r.1(b).
* Civil procedure – Security for due performance or security for costs – courts’ discretion and practice regarding full decretal security versus percentage deposit.
* Civil imprisonment – release conditional on compliance with security to pursue appeal.
|
25 October 2024 |
|
|
25 October 2024 |
|
|
24 October 2024 |
|
An application to cancel title based on a third party's criminal conviction failed for noncompliance with section 161 and procedural requirements.
Land law – Rectification/cancellation of title – Section 161 Registration of Titles Act – consequential orders require recovery of land from registered proprietor; Criminal conviction of a third party insufficient. Civil procedure – Suits involving deceased persons must be against legal representatives (Order 24); failure to join registered proprietor breaches fair hearing and property rights.
|
24 October 2024 |
|
|
24 October 2024 |
|
Temporary injunction altering status quo and based on hearsay set aside; third‑party rights barred pending trial.
* Civil procedure – temporary injunctions – prima facie case/triable issues – court may not decide merits at interlocutory stage; * Evidence – affidavit based on information must disclose source; hearsay in affidavits inadmissible to prove imminent harm; * Status quo – injunction must preserve, not alter, the pre‑existing possession and use of land; * Scope of injunction – interlocutory relief should be limited to the portion genuinely in dispute; * Limitation – trespass may be continuing but triability depends on pleadings and alleged date of trespass; * Locus visit – appropriate to identify disputed portion before further directions.
|
23 October 2024 |
|
Application for judicial review of ministerial directives concerning land possession dismissed as not amenable to judicial review; no contempt shown.
• Judicial review – amenability – distinction between public-law review and private disputes over land possession; judicial review not appropriate to enforce private property/trespass rights. • Contempt of court – elements and heightened standard of proof: lawful order, knowledge, ability to comply, failure to comply. • Representative orders and effect of judgment where multiple customary claimants exist – decree did not vest exclusive proprietorship. • Administrative action by minister – protection against unlawful eviction does not necessarily amount to ultra vires or contempt.
|
22 October 2024 |
|
|
22 October 2024 |
|
|
22 October 2024 |
|
The applicant's appeal against land-trespass, malicious damage, boundary-mark removal and assault convictions is dismissed.
Criminal law; appeal on facts and law; first appellate court duty to re-evaluate evidence; criminal trespass; malicious damage to property; removal of boundary marks with intent to defraud; assault occasioning actual bodily harm; assessment of inconsistencies; bona fide claim of right; sentencing discretion.
|
21 October 2024 |
|
|
21 October 2024 |
|
|
21 October 2024 |