|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| July 2023 |
|
|
|
26 July 2023 |
|
Accused convicted of rape after prosecution proved non-consensual intercourse, identity, and corroborative medical evidence beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Rape – Elements: unlawful carnal knowledge; absence of consent; identity of perpetrator. Burden and standard of proof – prosecution must establish every ingredient beyond reasonable doubt; conviction on strength of prosecution's case. Evidence – victim identification and testimony; medical evidence corroborating violent sexual intercourse; assessment of accused's defence credibility.
|
20 July 2023 |
|
Strangulation and malice were established, but the accused was acquitted because participation was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law - Murder: elements — death, unlawfulness, malice aforethought, participation; medical expert evidence establishing strangulation vs electrocution; insufficiency of after‑the‑fact evidence to prove accused's participation; acquittal where identification/participation not proved beyond reasonable doubt.
|
19 July 2023 |
|
Accused convicted of aggravated defilement: victim under 14, authority relationship and medical/victim evidence proved guilt; sentenced with remand deducted.
Criminal law – Sexual offences – Aggravated defilement (s.129 Penal Code Act) – ingredients: victim under 14, sexual act, person in authority, perpetration – requirement that prosecution prove each beyond reasonable doubt. Evidence – Victim’s testimony in sexual offence – significance and corroboration by medical examination and investigating officer’s findings. Authority – domestic worker living/working with victim’s parent can amount to person in authority. Sentencing – balancing deterrence and rehabilitation; deduction for remand time.
|
19 July 2023 |
|
Late reply struck out; trial magistrate’s failure to consider possession evidence led to revision, release of land and costs for the applicant.
Civil procedure – Notice of Motion – Order 52 Rule 3 CPR and Section 83(c) CPA – time for filing a reply – late affidavit struck out; Revision – material irregularity where trial magistrate failed to consider documentary evidence of possession – relief to release land from attachment and award costs.
|
17 July 2023 |
|
High Court set aside LCIII and Chief Magistrate proceedings as illegal for lack of jurisdiction and granted revision with costs.
• Civil Procedure – Revisionary jurisdiction – Sections 83 and 98 Civil Procedure Act – High Court’s power to set aside proceedings that are illegal or nullities.
• Jurisdiction – Local Council Courts – Limits on LCIII jurisdiction in land-related disputes; LCIII judgment held a nullity where jurisdiction lacking.
• Evidence – Unrebutted affidavit evidence taken as admitted where respondent files no replying affidavit or submissions.
• Principle – Once an illegality is established, courts must correct it.
|
14 July 2023 |
|
|
11 July 2023 |
|
|
11 July 2023 |
|
|
11 July 2023 |
|
|
10 July 2023 |
|
|
10 July 2023 |
|
Court partly allowed appeal varying taxed costs, reducing the bill to UGX 23,968,750 and awarding appeal costs to the applicant.
Advocates Act/Taxation of Costs – Appeal against taxing officer – Court may only interfere where award is manifestly excessive or based on wrong principle. Civil procedure – affidavits – non-parties (advocates) may depose affidavits if competent and not representing the party in the matter. Taxation – item-by-item scrutiny; duplicative, unsupported or excessive items may be taxed off or reduced. Relief – technical defects in form of order should not defeat substantive justice.
|
8 July 2023 |
|
A criminal acquittal is not a legal bar to related civil claims; fraud discovery postpones limitation.
Civil procedure – abuse of court process – effect of criminal judgment on subsequent civil suit; Evidence – distinction between criminal and civil standards of proof; Limitation of actions – postponement of limitation period on discovery of fraud under section 25(o).
|
7 July 2023 |
|
|
5 July 2023 |
|
A Chief Magistrate may validly reallocate a domestic violence matter for urgent disposal; procedural mistakes by counsel do not automatically vitiate jurisdiction.
Domestic Violence — expedited disposal and 48‑hour expectation; Magistrates Courts Act s.171 — Chief Magistrate’s supervisory reallocation of matters; Civil Procedure Act s.83 — revision for exercise of jurisdiction not vested or material irregularity; Procedural errors by counsel or mediator involvement not necessarily fatal in urgent domestic violence proceedings.
|
3 July 2023 |
|
A bare complaint of failure to evaluate evidence is an incompetent, fishing‑expedition ground of appeal.
Civil procedure – Appeals – Grounds of appeal – Requirement under Order 43 r.2 CPR for concise, non‑narrative grounds identifying specific errors. Appellate pleading – Failure to evaluate evidence – Allegation that a court failed to evaluate a witness without pointing to specific error constitutes a fishing expedition and is incompetent. Precedent – High Court bound to follow Court of Appeal decisions on pleading standards for grounds of appeal.
|
3 July 2023 |