High Court of Uganda

The High Court of Uganda is the third court of record in order of hierarchy and has unlimited original jurisdiction, which means that it can try any case of any value or crime of any magnitude. Appeals from all Magistrates Courts go to the High Court. 

The High Court is headed by the Honorable Principal Judge who is responsible for the administration of the court and has supervisory powers over Magistrate's courts. 

Physical address
Plot 2, the Square Kampala
13 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Topics
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
13 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
February 2021
Continuing trespass and pleaded fraud saved the land claim from limitation; magistrate’s title‑cancellation order set aside for High Court consideration.
Land law – Recovery and trespass – continuing tort and limitation; Fraud and unregistered interests; Bona fide purchaser protection; Magistrate’s jurisdictional limits versus High Court powers under s.177 RTA; Damages and proper rate of interest.
25 February 2021
An application served outside the statutory time under Order 5 CPR is incurably defective and will be dismissed.
Civil procedure – Order 5 CPR – Mandatory service periods – Service of summons, motions and interlocutory applications must be within 21 days or extension sought – Service outside time without extension deprives Court of jurisdiction – Application dismissed.
17 February 2021
Consent-order days counted exclusive of the order date; late default judgment and execution set aside, sale void.
Civil procedure — Default judgment — Setting aside — Consent order allowing out-of-time defence — Computation of days under Order 51 r.8 CPR — Registrar’s powers in execution and vesting orders over registered land — Validity of sale after irregular execution.
17 February 2021
Presence at a crime scene without proved participation or common intention is insufficient for conviction of robbery and attempted murder.
* Criminal law – aggravated robbery – elements: theft, use of force/violence, use of deadly weapon, participation and common intention. * Criminal law – attempted murder – unlawful intention to cause death and overt act manifesting that intention – inference from repeated stabbing. * Evidence – identification, arrest circumstances and caution statements – presence at scene insufficient absent proof of participation or common intention. * Criminal procedure – retracted caution statement admissible after trial‑within‑a‑trial; still requires corroboration for conviction.
12 February 2021
Long unchallenged occupation can establish bonafide occupancy, but encroachment and nonpayment of ground rent justify eviction and costs.
Land law – Registered land – Bonafide occupant under s.29(2) Land Act; requirement of 12 years’ unchallenged occupation; kibanja rights and inheritance; nonpayment of ground rent (busuulu) and eviction; appellate re-appraisal of factual findings.
10 February 2021
8 February 2021
A suit filed in a court lacking jurisdiction is a nullity and cannot be validly transferred to the High Court.
Civil procedure – jurisdiction – Magistrates Courts’ pecuniary limits – security for costs and affidavits as evidence of claim value – transfer under section 18 Civil Procedure Act – suit filed in a court without jurisdiction is a nullity and cannot be validly transferred.
5 February 2021
Court rectified a grant to correct the deceased’s name under Section 232 to enable estate land registration.
Succession Act s.232 – Rectification of grant – Correction of deceased’s name on Letters of Administration – Use of death certificate and certificate of title as evidence – Land registrar’s refusal to register administrators remedied by amended grant.
4 February 2021
The accused was convicted of aggravated defilement on corroborated child testimony, medical evidence, and reliable eyewitness identification.
Criminal law – aggravated defilement; proof of age by birth certificate; sexual act/penetration proven by child testimony and medical PF3A; unsworn child evidence admissible with caution and requires corroboration; identification in daylight by familiar witnesses; flight and inconsistent defence statements as corroboration.
4 February 2021
Recount applications are discretionary and require cogent direct evidence; hearsay and unsigned allegations do not justify recounts.
Election law – Recount and scrutiny of ballot papers – Discretionary nature of recounts under section 55(1) PEA – Requirement for cogent, non-hearsay evidence to justify recount – Significance of signed DR forms and permissible multiple handwriting – Costs and security for costs under sections 55(3) and 56(2) PEA.
2 February 2021
Stay pending appeal refused where applicant failed to show substantial loss and did not provide security.
* Civil procedure – Stay of execution pending appeal – Order 43 rr 4(3) CPR requirements: substantial loss, no unreasonable delay, security for due performance – mandatory conditions. * Appeals – Appeal does not automatically operate as a stay – need to preserve status quo to avoid rendering appeal nugatory. * Substantial loss – must be specifically pleaded and proved, not vague assertions. * Security – applicant must furnish or undertake security before a stay is granted.
2 February 2021
Defendant granted leave to defend summary suit after raising bona fide triable issues on ownership and an unproved will.
Civil procedure – Summary procedure (Order 36) – Leave to appear and defend – Requirement to show bona fide triable issues and reasonable grounds – Annexing proposed WSD and supporting evidence – Disputed ownership and unproved will/probate as grounds to refuse summary determination.
1 February 2021
The court convicted the accused of aggravated defilement, finding medical and circumstantial evidence proved act, age and identity.
* Criminal law – Defilement – Ingredients: unlawful sexual act, victim under 18, identity of perpetrator, offender HIV status where charged – proof by medical report and circumstantial evidence. * Evidence – Exhibits admitted under s.66 Trial on Indictment Act are deemed proved. * Identification – victim’s contemporaneous statements and accused’s conduct (admission, attempts at settlement, absconding) can corroborate identification. * Procedure – Victim’s absence from testimony does not necessarily defeat proof of defilement.
1 February 2021