High Court of Uganda

The High Court of Uganda is the third court of record in order of hierarchy and has unlimited original jurisdiction, which means that it can try any case of any value or crime of any magnitude. Appeals from all Magistrates Courts go to the High Court. 

The High Court is headed by the Honorable Principal Judge who is responsible for the administration of the court and has supervisory powers over Magistrate's courts. 

Physical address
Plot 2, the Square Kampala
363 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
363 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
November 2012
Appellant’s premature termination breached handbook procedure; unlawful dismissal damages upheld, defamation and exemplary awards quashed; PAYE but not NSSF deductions applied.
Employment law – disciplinary procedure – premature termination in breach of Staff Handbook – unlawful dismissal; Evidence – appellate reception of additional evidence (mortgage deed); Damages – validation of general damages for unlawful dismissal, setting aside defamation and exemplary awards for lack of publication/insufficient basis; Statutory deductions – PAYE payable but NSSF deduction not applicable post-termination; Interest – 24% on pay in lieu from suit filing, 10% on damages from judgment; Contract/loan – mortgage clause accelerating debt on cessation, but repayment tied to settlement of employer’s indebtedness.
29 November 2012
A retrial was ordered after the magistrate improperly rejected documentary evidence, rendering the trial unfair.
Evidence — Admissibility of secondary evidence and copies — Evidence Act ss.61, 62, 66 — Handwriting proof and secondary evidence; Civil Procedure — Order 43 (fresh trial) — Trial irregularity for improper rejection of documentary evidence; Right to test evidence by cross-examination; Appellate remedy of retrial.
29 November 2012
Whether circumstantial evidence, recent possession and burden of proof supported convictions and a compensation order.
Criminal law – Circumstantial evidence and recent possession – requirements for moral certainty; burden of proof remains with prosecution – silence of accused cannot substitute proof; double convictions – cannot be convicted both of theft and receipt of same property; compensation – improper where stolen goods recovered and returned.
28 November 2012
Application to set aside dismissal dismissed for failure to show sufficient cause and absence at hearing.
Civil procedure – application to set aside dismissal – restoration to cause list – sufficient cause required for non-appearance; Attendance on adjournment date but absence on hearing date; Failure to file affidavit in reply does not automatically amount to admission if facts denied in submissions.
26 November 2012
Revision inappropriate where challenge to res judicata is an error of law; appeal, not revision, is the proper remedy.
Civil Procedure – Revision under section 83 CPA – limited to jurisdictional errors, failure to exercise jurisdiction, or illegal/materially irregular exercise of jurisdiction; Res judicata – determination is a question of law for appellate review; Revision is inappropriate where remedy sought is effectively an appeal.
26 November 2012
The court allowed an application to proceed to a full hearing of a land dispute despite affidavit inconsistencies.
Civil procedure – application to set aside/vary – inconsistencies in affidavit – full hearing of land dispute – unfounded counsel misconduct allegations – no order as to costs.
26 November 2012
A certificate of title confers legal possession and supports a trespass claim absent proven fraud or a valid kibanja interest.
Land law – Registration of Titles Act – certificate of title as conclusive evidence of ownership and possession; trespass – right to sue; Evidence Act s.110 – limited application where title exists; kibanja/tenant by occupancy – proof required; procedure – ex parte hearing where respondent not served.
23 November 2012
High Court overruled preliminary objection, holding High Court appeal rules differ from Court of Appeal rules and appeal may proceed.
Civil procedure – appeals to High Court – time limit under section 79 Civil Procedure Act – exclusion of time for preparation of record; service of letter requesting record – Court of Appeal rules inapplicable to High Court appeals; certification requirements; negligence of counsel not to be visited on client.
23 November 2012
Non-compliance with court directive to file sworn witness statements warranted dismissal and personal costs against plaintiffs’ counsel.
Land law; ex parte proceedings – burden of proof remains – requirement for sworn witness statements – non-compliance amounts to abuse of court process – personal costs against counsel.
22 November 2012
Applicant in possession granted injunction preserving status quo pending determination of competing title dispute.
* Civil procedure – Temporary injunctions – Requirements: pending suit, status quo, prima facie case, irreparable injury, balance of convenience; Order 41 CPR applies to prevent alienation of disputed property pending litigation.
22 November 2012
Applicant raised triable issues but injunction denied because respondent was in actual possession and damages would suffice.
* Civil procedure – interlocutory relief – temporary injunction – requirements: pending suit, prima facie case, irreparable harm, balance of convenience. * Status quo – preservation of actual state of affairs prior to suit – possession and developments determine status quo. * Evidence – inadmissibility of evidence adduced from the bar; proper procedure to file rebutting affidavit or seek leave. * Order 41 CPR – power to grant injunction where property is in danger of alienation, wasting or damage.
22 November 2012
Objector failed to prove possession; MOU/assignment ineffective without deed/registration; application dismissed and wasted costs ordered against advocate.
Attachment and execution – possession as determinative factor; Memorandum of Understanding versus binding contract; company capacity and incorporation; authority of company secretary to sue without board resolution; assignment of lease requires deed and registration – equitable assignment does not confer legal possession; bills of lading as evidence of title; licence to occupy does not pass interest defeating attachment; wasted costs against advocate for prosecuting unauthorised proceedings.
20 November 2012
Plaintiff’s special damages claim failed for lack of cogent proof; vacant possession and eviction granted.
* Evidence – special damages – require strict, cogent proof by balance of probabilities; oral evidence insufficient without corroboration or receipts. * Civil procedure – departure from pleadings and contradictions undermines credibility of claim for pecuniary loss. * Remedies – interest on damages payable from date of suit if damages proved; rate subject to court determination. * Property – vacant possession conceded and eviction ordered.
20 November 2012
Accused convicted of two murders on reliable identification, corroborative retracted statement, and common intention; two consecutive 20-year terms.
Criminal law – Murder (Sections 188, 189 Penal Code) – Visual identification at night under bright moonlight – Reliability factors (prior acquaintance, quality of light) – Retracted charge and caution statement as corroborative evidence – Common intention (section 20 Penal Code) – Consecutive custodial sentences for multiple murders.
19 November 2012
Prosecution proved aggravated defilement of a child beyond reasonable doubt; accused convicted and sentenced to 17 years imprisonment.
* Criminal law – Aggravated defilement – elements: victim under 14, sexual intercourse, identity of perpetrator; medical and eyewitness corroboration. * Alibi – proximity of alleged alternative location and prosecution’s rebuttal. * Sentence – deterrence and protection of children.
19 November 2012
A registered certificate of title prevails over an unproved customary occupation claim absent fraud; caveat reinstatement did not cancel the title.
Land law – customary occupation versus registered title; effect of reinstated caveat; indefeasibility of title absent fraud; allocation by government official versus customary land; admissibility and sufficiency of evidence of possession; procedural non-compliance in grounds of appeal but merits determination in public interest.
16 November 2012
Deemed admission to counterclaim plus proved fraud justified title rectification and dismissal of the appeal.
* Civil procedure – Counterclaim – Reply – Order 8 r.18(5) CPR: failure to reply deemed admission of facts; court may permit late reply. * Court fees – Rule 6 Court Fees Rules: discretion to validate documents by ordering payment of fees retrospectively. * Land law – Fraud in registration – Superimposed survey marks, prior occupation and failure to compensate customary occupants can amount to fraud to defeat unregistered interest. * Survey evidence – Resurvey/Joint survey relied upon to determine overlap (Plot 234) and justify rectification of title.
16 November 2012
Vendor’s failure to transfer title is breach; kibanja rights require proof and registered title stands unless fraud is proven.
Land law – sale of mailo land – handwritten addenda to sale agreement – validity and effect; Breach of contract – vendor’s duty to pass good title – specific performance and damages; Customary tenure (kibanja) – burden of proof and requirements; Certificate of title – conclusive evidence of ownership under RTA and impeachable only upon proof of fraud; Fraud in land transactions – must be pleaded and strictly proved.
16 November 2012
The appellant’s land claim failed: cause of action accrued in 2006, locus visits unnecessary, and unpleaded fraud could not succeed.
* Land law – continuous trespass – accrual of cause of action when possession is denied (2006); * Limitation – continuous tort exception; * Locus in quo – visit discretionary, not mandatory; * Evidence – documentary sale agreement preferred over inconsistent oral evidence; * Fraud – must be pleaded and strictly proved; * Gift inter vivos – reversionary/inherited interest distinguished.
16 November 2012
Mandamus was premature; applicant must demand payment of the revised government judgment debt before court compels payment.
* Administrative law – prerogative writs – mandamus – discretionary remedy – requirement of a clear legal right and appropriateness of remedy where taxed costs have been disputed and revised under s.19(3) Government Proceedings Act. * Civil procedure – enforcement of judgment debts against the State – necessity of fresh demand after revision of taxed costs; prematurity of mandamus application. * Public finance – budgetary year considerations – notice that non-payment within the financial year may attract mandamus.
15 November 2012
Review of a consent order dismissed where alleged error was disputed, not apparent on record, and discovered after excessive delay.
Civil procedure – review of consent orders – application under Order 46(1)(b) and Section 83 – error apparent on face of record required for review; disputed factual controversies and negotiated settlements are unsuitable for review; delay in detecting alleged error undermines review claim.
14 November 2012
High Court may revise magistrate orders and set aside an ex parte judgment where procedural technicalities caused material injustice.
• Revision — High Court’s power under s.83 CPA to revise magistrates’ proceedings, including interlocutory orders effectively disposing suits. • Affidavits — failure to distinguish knowledge and belief does not necessarily invalidate whole affidavit; offending parts may be severed. • Adjournments — genuine adjournment requests by letter from counsel should be considered to avoid injustice; courts must apply substantive justice (Art.126(2)(e)). • Ex parte judgments — may be set aside where refusal to adjourn and procedural technicalities result in material irregularity and denial of hearing on triable issues.
14 November 2012
Procedural irregularities and apparent tampering with court records warranted setting aside the judgment and ordering a retrial and consolidation.
Civil procedure – missing pleadings and tampered court records – malpractice and inference of miscarriage of justice – appellate review impeded – retrial and consolidation ordered; service to Inspectorate of Courts.
14 November 2012
Plaintiff failed to prove Registrar’s fraud and the tort claim was time-barred; suit dismissed with costs.
* Land law – Alleged fraudulent transfer of registered land – proof of fraud must be strict and establish nexus to Registrar of Titles.* Public law/tort – Actions against the Government – two-year limitation for torts under the Civil Procedure and Limitation (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act; accrual and knowledge rule; disability must be pleaded and proven to suspend limitation.* Evidence – hearsay inadmissible to prove lack of consent by absent administrators.* Registered title and long-standing transfers undermine allegations of recent fraudulent interference by Registry officials.
13 November 2012
Application for judicial review against university for alleged unfair withholding of research funds dismissed for lack of evidence.
Judicial review – administrative law – mandamus and prohibition – university research funding – liability for returned funds – no evidence of bias or unlawful withholding – applicant's awareness of administrative error.
9 November 2012
Death by strangulation proved with malice, but circumstantial evidence failed to prove the accused’s participation beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – murder – elements: death, unlawfulness, malice aforethought, participation – circumstantial evidence and reliability of admissions made while intoxicated.
9 November 2012
An unchallenged affidavit showed the respondent lacked legal interest to sustain a caveat, so the court ordered its removal.
* Land law – Caveat – Lodging and maintenance of caveats under RTA s139 – requirement of lawful estate or interest. * Evidence – Effect of unchallenged affidavit and annexures in ex parte proceedings – deemed admission and probative value. * Civil procedure – Ex parte hearing permissible where respondent fails to file affidavit in opposition (CPR Order 9/Order 52). * Mortgage law – Transfer to mortgagee and effect on proprietors’ estate under Mortgage Act.
8 November 2012
Counsel’s negligence may justify setting aside a dismissal and reinstating an appeal for hearing on the merits.
Civil procedure – appeal dismissed for counsel’s failure to file submissions – negligence of counsel as sufficient cause to set aside dismissal; Order 43 r16 inapplicable to failure to file submissions; section 98/inherent powers to reinstate appeals; Order 17(4) – judge may write judgment where submissions not made.
8 November 2012
Appellants' grievous harm convictions set aside where medical evidence showed only temporary bruising, not maiming.
Criminal law – Grievous harm vs actual bodily harm – medical evidence on permanence of injury – proof of common intention/joint liability – appellate re-evaluation of evidence.
8 November 2012
Plaintiffs with a prior equitable interest were entitled to a right of way; the Board’s allocation was void and the lease cancelled.
Land law – Allocation of public land by District Land Board – Prior equitable interest – Section 59 Land Act (as amended) – Void transaction; Easement – Right of way by necessity; Ex parte proceedings following defendant's default; Punitive/exemplary damages against public body for arbitrary conduct.
8 November 2012
Defendants established a bona fide triable issue and were granted leave to defend a summary debt claim including disputed interest.
Civil procedure – Summary judgment (Order 36) – Leave to appear and defend – requirement to show bona fide triable issue; dispute over contractual liability for interest arising from creditor’s bank loan – interest claim held triable where not provided for in contract.
8 November 2012
Temporary injunction refused where respondents’ actual possession prevailed and alleged loss was compensable by damages.
Land law – temporary injunctions – Order 41 CPR – requirements: pending suit, prima facie case, irreparable injury, balance of convenience and preservation of status quo; actual possession versus absent claimant; damages as adequate remedy.
8 November 2012
Cancellation of a proprietor’s registration without a fair hearing was unlawful; applicant entitled to reinstatement.
* Land law – Registrar of Titles – cancellation/rectification of entries on certificate of title – mandatory compliance with section 91 Land Act (notice, hearing, reasons, calling duplicate certificate).; * Procedural fairness – rules of natural justice – opportunity to be heard before administrative cancellation of title.; * Civil procedure – ex parte proceedings – failure to file affidavit in reply treated as admission but burden of proof remains on applicant.; * Remedy – unlawful cancellation declared void and reinstatement ordered.
1 November 2012
Failure to conduct a mandatory recount under section 54 PEA invalidated a narrowly decided election.
Election law – Parliamentary Elections Act (PEA) – mandatory recount under s.54 where margin <50 votes – Returning Officer’s duties – custody and seals on ballot boxes (s.51–52) – proof of disenfranchisement – effect of non-compliance on result.
1 November 2012
Court appointed foreign applicants as legal guardians and permitted removal abroad as being in the infant’s best interests.
Children law – best interests of the child paramount; appointment of legal guardians; foreign applicants permitted where no suitable local relatives; permission to remove child abroad; oversight and registration requirements.
1 November 2012
A strike‑out for no cause of action fails if the plaint on its face pleads the essential elements; factual disputes need trial evidence.
Land law – preliminary objection – whether plaint discloses cause of action; procedural principle: court looks only at plaint and annexures and assumes pleaded facts true; disputes over lease expiry, standing and pre‑incorporation transactions require trial evidence.
1 November 2012
Administrative guidance is not a reviewable decree; consent judgment finally determined by the Supreme Court cannot be re-opened.
Civil Procedure – Review under Order 46 CPR – review limited to decrees or orders; administrative guidance not reviewable; duty to extract formal decree before review; finality of Supreme Court decisions; execution proceedings to be challenged under Order 22 rule 19 CPR.
1 November 2012
Unchallenged affidavit evidence established a caveatable interest; application to remove caveat dismissed with costs.
Caveat — removal application; caveatable interest under section 139 RTA; effect of unchallenged affidavit evidence; procedural default — Order 17 r.4 CPR permits determination despite applicant's failure to file rejoinder.
1 November 2012
October 2012
Murder proved but accused acquitted because single-witness identification in dark, frightening conditions was unreliable and uncorroborated.
Criminal law – Murder and attempted murder; proof of unlawful killing and malice aforethought; visual identification – single witness reliability; need for corroboration in difficult conditions; doctrine of common intention; burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt.
30 October 2012
Court convicted the first accused for aggravated robbery on reliable identification; co‑accused acquitted for insufficient evidence.
* Criminal law – Aggravated robbery – elements: theft plus use or threat of deadly weapon or actual violence; proof beyond reasonable doubt required. * Criminal evidence – Identification – reliability of contemporaneous identification, corroboration by independent witness, and weight of inconsistent initial police statements. * Criminal procedure – Alibi – prosecution duty to disprove alibi by independent evidence. * Sentencing – balancing aggravating factors (victim’s age, viciousness, prevalence of the crime) and mitigating factors (first offender, remand time).
29 October 2012
Applicant entitled to join respondents as co-defendants to avoid multiplicity; substantive defences reserved for the main suit.
* Civil procedure – Joinder of parties – Order 1 rule 3 CPR – Necessary parties where rights arise from same transaction and multiplicity of suits to be avoided. * Civil procedure – Joinder stage procedure – merits and defences (bona fide purchase, alternative access) not to be decided at joinder stage. * Res judicata/privity – Consent judgment in another suit not binding where applicant was not a party. * Land – successors in title and municipal approval relevant to joinder but for substantive determination in main suit.
25 October 2012
Applicant failed to show judicial recovery from the registered proprietor; vesting order under section 77 RTA was refused.
* Land law – Registration of Titles – Vesting orders – Section 77 RTA contingent on recovery of land by proceedings from registered proprietor. * Civil procedure – ex parte hearings – defendants’ failure to file defence does not displace applicant’s burden to prove case on balance of probabilities. * Abuse of process – seeking transfer of registered title absent judicial recovery.
25 October 2012
Omission to name who drew an affidavit is a curable technicality; court may order correction and costs.
Affidavits – Formalities – omission to state who drew affidavit; Preliminary objection – technical defects; Article 126(e) Constitution – court’s power to cure irregularities and order costs; Authorities: Sagu v Roadmaster Cycles; Kebirungi Justine v Road Trainers.
25 October 2012
Appellants had long-standing kibanja rights on clan land; respondent trespassed and was not a bona fide occupant, injunction and damages granted.
Land law – kibanja/user rights on clan (mailo) land – proof by long occupation and wills; Trespass – elements and remedies where user-rights exist; Bona fide occupant – definition under s.29(2) Land Act and statutory 12-year rule; Civil procedure – appellate powers to reframe issues (s.80 CPA) and to determine trespass on record; Locus in quo – role in encroachment disputes; Judgment formalities – signing by different magistrate irregular but not necessarily prejudicial.
25 October 2012
Applicant entitled to restoration of leasehold encumbrance after registrar unlawfully endorsed "surrendered" and failed to justify or correct it.
* Land law – registration – rectification of register – removal of encumbrance and endorsement "surrendered" without instrument number or consent. * Powers of Registrar – section 91(2) Land Act and section 182 Registration of Titles Act – duty to correct erroneous entries. * Procedure – ex parte relief where respondent is served but does not file affidavit or appear; uncontroverted affidavit evidence deemed admitted.
25 October 2012
An appellate court may admit a newly discovered certificate of title when it was unavailable at trial and is relevant to the appeal.
Civil procedure – Appeal – Admission of additional evidence on appeal; Section 80(1)(d) Civil Procedure Act; Order 43 r.22 CPR; Exceptional circumstances – evidence not available at trial; Relevance and credibility of newly discovered documents (certificate of title); Effect of registered title on bona fide purchaser finding.
18 October 2012
Whether an original boundary agreement and locus evidence prevail over a later sketch in a land trespass dispute.
Land law – boundary dispute – original sale agreement (Exp.1) vs later sketch (Exd.1) – evidentiary weight; locus in quo evidence and tampering with boundary marks (kokowe tree); appellate review of factual findings.
18 October 2012
Affidavits sworn by unauthorized non‑parties are incompetent; unchallenged applicant's facts led to the application being allowed.
Civil Procedure – Order 3 and Order 19 CPR – competence of deponents to swear affidavits – recognized agent, advocate or holder of power of attorney required – affidavits by clerk/process server or non‑party defendant incompetent – unchallenged affidavit facts accepted.
18 October 2012
Civil Procedure|Appeals and reviews|Land
18 October 2012
Illegal eviction entitled the plaintiff to general damages; claimed special damages failed for lack of strict proof.
* Civil torts – unlawful eviction and removal of goods – evidence of forcible entry and removal; * Damages – distinction between special and general damages; special damages must be specifically pleaded and strictly proved; * Liability – resident/in-charge owner held liable; capacity to sue or be sued.
12 October 2012