High Court of Uganda

The High Court of Uganda is the third court of record in order of hierarchy and has unlimited original jurisdiction, which means that it can try any case of any value or crime of any magnitude. Appeals from all Magistrates Courts go to the High Court. 

The High Court is headed by the Honorable Principal Judge who is responsible for the administration of the court and has supervisory powers over Magistrate's courts. 

Physical address
Plot 2, the Square Kampala
22 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
22 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
March 2009
Accused convicted of murder on circumstantial evidence; co-accused acquitted; life imprisonment imposed.
Criminal law – Murder – Elements: death, unlawfulness, malice aforethought, participation; Circumstantial evidence – last seen with deceased, scene of struggle, material objects linking accused; Proof of stain not scientifically tested but evidentially linked; Acquittal on no case to answer for co‑accused; Sentence – life imprisonment as mercy notwithstanding severity.
31 March 2009
Prosecution proved robbery: immediate victim identification, medical proof of grievous harm and arrest at scene established guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Robbery – Elements: theft, use/threat of violence, possession of deadly weapon or grievous harm – Identification – caution with sole identifying witness at night; corroborative factors including immediate naming, arrest at scene and conduct of suspects; medical evidence establishing grievous harm.
31 March 2009
Court convicted one accused for robbery on positive identification; two others acquitted for insufficient corroboration.
Criminal law – Robbery – ingredients: theft, use/threat of violence, deadly weapon, participation – Identification evidence at night – candle/torchlight and proximity as factors – Child witness evidence and corroboration (s.40(3) TIA) – Alibi – Sentence and compensation (s.186(4) PCA; s.124 TIA).
31 March 2009
Whether murder was proved beyond reasonable doubt by eyewitness and forensic evidence, and whether death sentence was appropriate.
Criminal law – Murder: proof of death and identification of decomposed remains; unlawful killing; malice aforethought inferred from nature of head injury and conduct; role of eyewitness testimony and corroborative exhibits; alibi and framing allegations; concealment as corroboration; sentencing (death).
31 March 2009
Court set aside ex parte judgment, holding execution does not prevent inquiry into defective service and setting aside decree.
* Civil procedure – setting aside ex parte decree – duty to investigate service of summons – Order 9 r.27. * Effect of execution – execution does not preclude setting aside decree or staying/setting aside execution where service ineffective – O.36 r.11. * Evidence of service – affidavit of service not conclusive; party asserting lack of service must present satisfactory proof.
30 March 2009
Contracts with infants/toddlers are void; public authority negligently facilitating forged transfers is liable and subject to punitive damages.
* Contract law – capacity of minors – infants and toddlers lack capacity to enter commercial contracts; such agreements void and rights protected by child rights principles. * Fraud and forgery – evidentiary value of forensic handwriting analysis in setting aside fraudulent sale and tenancy documents. * Public authority liability – municipal council negligent in recording forged tenancy and liable in contract and tort; exemplary/punitive damages available for arbitrary oppressive acts by public servants. * Remedies – cancellation of forged sale, restitution of possession, damages payable by minors’ guardians as trustees, assessment of special and general damages.
30 March 2009
A contracting authority cannot avoid payment obligations by blaming donor non-disbursement; arbitration clause did not bar court action.
* Contract law – breach for non-payment – supplier performed contractual obligations; contracting authority liable despite donor-funded project. * Civil procedure – arbitration clause – failure to move for stay and refer to arbitration; court retains jurisdiction. * Damages – general damages assessed under Hadley v Baxendale principles; interest and costs awarded.
26 March 2009
Executive pay increases pending parliamentary approval may lawfully determine pension entitlements; statutory pension cap upheld.
Pensions law – computation of pension on last emoluments where executive increased salaries pending Parliamentary amendment (Salaries & Allowances (Specified Officers) Act s.3(4)) – retrospective/administrative flexibility; Pensions Act s.13 – statutory cap (87%) on pensions and limitation of pensionable service; enforceability of pension rights; role of Auditor General and Consolidated Fund (Articles 128(5), 154(3)).
26 March 2009
Minister exceeded statutory authority under section 95; court quashed decision and remitted choice to interim LCV councillors.
Administrative law – Judicial review – Certiorari and Prohibition to correct error of law and restrain implementation; Excess of jurisdiction – Minister’s misuse of s.95 Local Governments Act; Local government formation – Role of LCV councillors (Interim Council) and Electoral Commission in choosing district headquarters and name; Limitation of judicial review to legality of decision-making process.
26 March 2009
Appellate court held permanent stores were part of the land, ordered retrial after trial court’s failure to visit locus in quo.
Land law – fixtures: degree and object of annexation; permanent structures become part of land. Civil procedure – locus in quo: necessity of site visit where boundaries disputed. Procedure – retrial ordered where trial court failed to inspect locus and misapplied law; proper service and defences required under Order 9 Rule 10. Ownership on liquidation – determination of who acquired land and fixtures sold by liquidated entity.
26 March 2009
Unlawful dismissal of a head teacher led to statutory compensation, pension and aggravated damages, not reinstatement.
Local government employment — wrongful dismissal for lack of charge and fair hearing; Public Service Commission direction ignored; reinstatement declined — compensation awarded under Local Governments Act and Pensions Act; aggravated damages and interest; employer's failure to rebut unchallenged employee evidence.
26 March 2009
Appeal dismissed: trial court properly decided land dispute; LC rulings unproven and no prejudice from no locus visit.
Land law – trespass – sale agreement authenticity and fraudulent alteration; res judicata – burden to produce authenticated LC court records; evaluation of evidence – magistrate’s findings upheld; locus in quo – visit unnecessary where boundaries and occupancy evidence are clear.
26 March 2009
State vicariously liable for RDC-ordered arrest and seizure causing trespass and loss to the plaintiff’s business.
* Constitutional/administrative law – public officials’ actions – RDC ordering arrests and seizures without owner inquiry; trespass to business premises. * Tort – trespass to land and chattels; wrongful seizure and loss of chattels; evidentiary burden for loss of cash and destroyed property. * Vicarious liability – state liable for acts of district commissioner and police within scope of duty. * Damages – assessment of value, loss of income, general damages, interest and costs; exemplary damages not awarded.
26 March 2009
Prosecution failed to prove identity and causation for the indicted victim; no prima facie case of murder, accused acquitted.
* Criminal law – No-case-to-answer – Prima facie standard under section 73 TIA – requirement that prosecution prove death of person named in indictment. * Murder – ingredients: death of named person; unlawful killing; malice aforethought; causation by accused. * Identification of deceased – necessity of proving recovered body is the indicted victim before inferring guilt.
25 March 2009
Application to review adoption reporting condition dismissed for lack of evidence that it blocked foreign citizenship recognition.
Adoption law – Conditions on adoption orders – Annual progressive reports and five‑year review – Sufficiency of evidence to justify review – Proof required of foreign government's non‑recognition of adoption.
24 March 2009
Respondent’s vehicle caused a fatal accident; court awarded Shs.30,000,000 general damages plus proved special damages and costs.
Tort — Fatal road accident — Employer vicarious liability for employee driver; Assessment of damages — multiplicand, multiplier and contingencies; Proof of special damages — requirement of specific evidence; Life expectancy/working life in assessing future losses.
22 March 2009
Unlawful intercourse and lack of consent were proved, but identity was uncorroborated; accused acquitted.
* Criminal procedure — s.73 Trial on Indictments Act — sufficiency of prosecution evidence at close of prosecution. * Rape — essential ingredients: unlawful intercourse; lack of consent; identity of accused. * Identification evidence — single identifying witness; need for corroboration; effect of poor identification conditions, delays, and contradictions. * Medical evidence corroborating lack of consent does not substitute for reliable identification of the assailant.
22 March 2009
Circumstantial evidence of passing a phone while under arrest was insufficient to prove receiving stolen property.
* Criminal law – Receiving stolen property – elements: theft, ownership, receiving with knowledge – prosecution must prove participation and mens rea. * Criminal procedure – No‑case-to-answer/prima facie standard at close of prosecution’s case. * Evidence – Circumstantial evidence: must be inconsistent with innocence and exclude other reasonable hypotheses (Teper; Simon Musoke). * Burden of proof – presumption of innocence; prosecution must establish essential ingredients beyond reasonable doubt (prima facie at this stage).
10 March 2009
A prominent comparative advert that implied dishonesty in labeling was defamatory; plaintiff awarded general and exemplary damages, injunction and costs.
Defamation — libel — sufficiency of pleadings; reference/innuendo — identification of plaintiff from juxtaposed advertisements; defamatory meaning — test of lowering in estimation of right-thinking members of society; justification defence — burden on defendant; exemplary damages — punishment/deterrence where defendant acted to gain advantage and ignored regulator.
5 March 2009
Court dismissed treason charge after six-year prosecution delay constituting abuse of process and oppression of the accused.
Constitutional law – powers of the Director of Public Prosecutions to institute, prosecute or discontinue criminal proceedings; Criminal procedure – abuse of process; Inherent jurisdiction of the court to prevent oppression and prejudice from prolonged, stalled prosecutions; Article 139 Constitution; Section 14 Judicature Act; Connelly v DPP; remedy — dismissal of charge.
5 March 2009
The applicant was appointed guardian of the infant's estate and may manage and pledge the child's property.
* Constitutional and jurisdictional law – parens patriae – High Court’s power to appoint guardians of infants’ estates where statute is silent. * Children Act – guiding welfare principle – lacuna regarding estate management. * Judicature Act – application of common law and equity to fill statutory gaps. * Guardianship – guardian as trustee obliged to account; authority to manage, pledge or sell child’s property without separate order for each act.
3 March 2009
Provocation found to negate malice; accused convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to ten years imprisonment.
Criminal law – killing during a domestic quarrel – admission in charge and caution statement – medical evidence of fatal stab wound – provocation as partial defence negating malice aforethought – conviction for manslaughter and sentencing considerations.
3 March 2009