High Court of Uganda

The High Court of Uganda is the third court of record in order of hierarchy and has unlimited original jurisdiction, which means that it can try any case of any value or crime of any magnitude. Appeals from all Magistrates Courts go to the High Court. 

The High Court is headed by the Honorable Principal Judge who is responsible for the administration of the court and has supervisory powers over Magistrate's courts. 

Physical address
Plot 2, the Square Kampala
6 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
6 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
July 1999
Nine-year unexplained delay and State inaction amounted to abuse of process, warranting stay and dismissal of the accused's charges.
Criminal procedure – insanity – magistrates' court powers where statutory provision deficient – application of principles of justice, equity and good conscience. Criminal procedure – delay – unexplained nine-year pre-trial delay – abuse of court process under Section 19(2) of the Judicature Statute. Constitutional right – right to a fair and speedy trial (Article 28(1)) – prejudice from prolonged pre-trial detention. State responsibility – prosecution and prison authorities’ failure to progress case – gross inaction warranting dismissal. Remedies – stay of prosecution and dismissal of charges; recommendation for law reform to prevent systemic injustice.
28 July 1999
Conviction based solely on an unsworn child’s evidence and hearsay lacked the independent corroboration required by law, so appellate court acquitted the accused.
Criminal law – Evidence of children – Section 99(3) Magistrates Courts Act requires independent corroboration for unsworn child evidence; hearsay reports of third parties do not constitute corroboration – hostile witness – prior police statement not proved where witness recants – conviction unsafe without material corroboration.
27 July 1999
Speculative objections that counsel may be a witness must be pleaded; counsel not disqualified until actually called.
Advocate professional conduct – counsel appearing for a company where he is company secretary – alleged likelihood of being called as witness – disqualification only when actually called; court cannot prevent speculative breaches; requirement to plead matters likely to take opposite party by surprise (Order 6 r.5 CPR); costs follow event.
15 July 1999
Whether Tooro regency exists and whether Orukurato validly appointed lawful regents — court upholds regency.
Customary law – Regency in Tooro Kingdom – existence and codification in 1962 Constitution; Evidence Act ss.13 & 46 – proof of custom; Cultural institutions – capacity and composition of Orukurato to elect regents; Scope of regents’ authority – non‑ritualistic vs ritualistic functions; Testamentary/guardianship law – oral appointment ineffective; Judicial restraint – cultural disputes primarily for cultural assembly.
13 July 1999
Orukurato lawfully appointed regents; regents limited to non-ritual functions; plaintiff's challenge dismissed with costs.
Customary law — Regency in Tooro — Existence and codification of regency in 1962 Constitution; Orukurato's capacity to elect regents; scope of regents' authority (non-ritual functions only); limits of oral testamentary appointments; standard of proof for custom under Evidence Act.
13 July 1999
Abolition of entering appearance bars S.17 arbitration stay; defendant’s failure to file defence results in default judgment.
Arbitration Act s.17 – stay pending arbitration; Civil Procedure Order 9 r.1B – objections to jurisdiction/service; abolition of entering of appearance (1998 amendments) – notice to defend ≠ appearance; default judgment for failure to file W.S.D.; adequacy of affidavit of service.
6 July 1999