|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| February 1996 |
|
|
A misnamed local authority after statutory change can be a bona fide mistake and does not automatically defeat a plaint.
Local government — naming of defendant after statutory reorganisation — bona fide mistake in naming former statutory entity — amendment/substitution of parties; Civil Procedure — preliminary objection under Order 6 rule 27 CPR; Statutory notice — requirement and proof of service for suits against local authorities.
|
23 February 1996 |
|
Preliminary objection overruled: misnaming of a reconstituted local authority was a bona fide, amendable mistake; notice/service not disproved.
Civil procedure – preliminary objection – Suit against a formerly‑named local authority after statutory reorganisation – whether misnaming renders plaint incompetent; service of statutory notice on local authorities; bona fide mistake and amendment under the CPR.
|
23 February 1996 |
|
Second defendant liable for negligence in leaving lorry parked without adequate warnings; first defendant not negligent.
Negligence – vehicle broken down/parked on roadway – adequacy and deployment of warning devices; contributory negligence – alleged speed of oncoming minibus; assessment of general damages for multiple serious fractures and residual disability; award of costs against negligent defendant.
|
22 February 1996 |
|
|
22 February 1996 |
|
Prosecution failed to prove penetration or reliably identify the accused; witness with motive to lie required corroboration.
Criminal law – Rape – elements: penetration, consent and identification – necessity of proof of penetration and importance of corroboration for identification and for witnesses with motive to lie; medical evidence in sexual offence cases.
|
22 February 1996 |
|
Poor lighting, medical contradictions and unreliable identification led to acquittal for alleged rape.
Criminal law – Rape – requirement to prove penetration, lack of consent and identity beyond reasonable doubt; caution when relying on single-witness identification at night without corroboration
Evidence – medical evidence and contemporaneous observations may corroborate or undermine complainant’s account; contradictions and credibility issues can create reasonable doubt
|
22 February 1996 |
|
The accused pleaded guilty to manslaughter and was sentenced to three years with remand time credited.
Criminal law – Manslaughter – Change of plea from not guilty to guilty – Acceptance of plea – Sentencing – Mitigation: guilty plea, remorse, first offender status, dependent children – Credit for time spent on remand.
|
21 February 1996 |
|
Medical evidence and a found-true retracted confession corroborated a child’s unsworn account, leading to conviction for defilement.
Criminal law – Defilement (s.123 Penal Code) – elements: victim under 18, penetration, identity of accused
Evidence – unsworn evidence of a child of tender years requires corroboration – medical and eyewitness evidence can suffice
Confession – retracted/repudiated confessions admissible only if court is satisfied of truth; corroboration usually sought
Defences – insanity and intoxication: accused bears burden to establish probability of insanity; involuntary intoxication provisions considered
|
15 February 1996 |
|
Medical and corroborative evidence and an admitted confession supported conviction for defilement; insanity and intoxication defences failed.
Criminal law – Defilement – Elements: victim’s age, penetration, identity – Child unsworn evidence and corroboration – Medical evidence of hymenal rupture – Retracted confession admissibility and weight – Insanity/intoxication defences and burden of proof – Sentence for first offender.
|
15 February 1996 |
|
No prima facie case where recovered exhibits were not produced and sole, contradictory identification lacked corroboration.
Criminal law – no case to answer – prima facie case test (Bhatt) – possession of recently stolen property – failure to produce exhibits – single identification witness – need for corroboration.
|
15 February 1996 |
|
Claim to prove a will in Uganda dismissed because deceased was domiciled in India and foreign probate/re-sealing was required.
Probate law – Jurisdiction – Domicile of deceased abroad – Requirement to obtain foreign probate and re-seal under Probate (Re-sealing) Act (Cap.144) s.3 before Ugandan court can give effect to foreign grant; validity of will and caveat where primary probate lies abroad.
|
12 February 1996 |
|
Court dismissed Ugandan probate suit because deceased was domiciled in India and foreign probate must be obtained and re-sealed first.
Private international law – Domicile – Deceased domiciled in India – Probate jurisdiction; Probate (Re‑Sealing) Act (Cap.144) s.3 – foreign grant to be produced and re-sealed to operate in Uganda; Jurisdiction – necessity of obtaining foreign probate before Ugandan recognition; Caveat and declaratory relief on will – jurisdictional bar when deceased domiciled abroad.
|
12 February 1996 |
|
Conviction for defilement requires proven penetration and identity beyond reasonable doubt; inconsistencies justified acquittal.
Criminal law – Defilement – requirement of proof of penetration – reliability of medical evidence – weight of unsworn child evidence – circumstantial evidence and contradictions – standard: beyond reasonable doubt – acquittal.
|
12 February 1996 |
|
|
7 February 1996 |
|
Accused pleaded guilty to manslaughter for a brutal killing and was sentenced to eight years despite conduct bordering on murder.
Criminal law – Manslaughter plea accepted despite facts bordering on murder – Sentencing principles: fit between offence and offender – First offender mitigation – Remand credit – Welfare of dependants as mitigation.
|
7 February 1996 |